Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment in Syphilitic Uveitis: A Case Series and Comprehensive Review of the Literature

ABSTRACTPurpose Uveitis is the most common ocular manifestation of syphilis. However, an association between syphilitic uveitis and rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) is not widely recognized. We report a consecutive series of six new cases of syphilitic uveitis complicated by RRD and describe the typical characteristics, clinical course, and surgical management of such cases.Methods Consecutive case series and comprehensive review of the literature.Results We identified a total of 19 cases (23 eyes) with syphilitic uveitis subsequently complicated by RRD, including six new cases (seven eyes) reported here and 13 cases (16 eyes) previously reported in the literature. Fifteen patients (79%) were positive for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and not on combination antiretroviral therapy. Most retinal detachments developed within two months of uveitis presentation; retinal breaks were often found in areas of previous retinitis. Sixteen eyes (70%) were complicated by early proliferative vitreoretinopathy. Twenty-one eyes underwent surgical repair, of which six (26%) suffered re-detachment. Surgical management commonly involved pars-plana vitrectomy and silicone oil tamponade, with or without scleral buckling. Visual outcomes were generally poor: only six eyes (26%) attained visual acuity of 20/40 or better and 11 eyes (48%) remained 20/200 or worse.Conclusions Patients with syphilitic uveitis, as with viral retinitis, should be monitored closely for the development of retinal tears and RRD. A combination of pars plana vitrectomy with silicone oil tamponade and/or scleral buckle placement is a prudent surgical approach to most cases of syphilitic RRD, although visual prognosis remains guarded.KEYWORDS: Syphilisretinal detachmentretinitisuveitisproliferative vitreoretinopathy Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Ethical considerationsExternal IRB approval was obtained through Advarra, Inc. for retrospective chart review. Informed consent was obtained from all patients included in our case series.Additional informationFundingThe author(s) reported that there is no funding associated with the work featured in this article.