Shame on you! How incivility and absence of supporting evidence in likeminded Facebook comments influence evaluations of ingroup members and online political participation

无礼 社会心理学 羞耻 政治 心理学 内群和外群 论证(复杂分析) 背景(考古学) 政治学 法学 古生物学 生物化学 化学 生物
作者
Yonghwan Kim
出处
期刊:Online Information Review [Emerald Publishing Limited]
卷期号:48 (3): 619-643 被引量:4
标识
DOI:10.1108/oir-12-2021-0650
摘要

Purpose This study examined how likeminded Facebook comments with incivility and without supporting evidence influence readers' evaluations of the commenter and online political participation intention. This study also investigated whether the indirect effect of exposure to uncivil comments and comments without evidence on online political participation through evaluations of the commenters is contingent on the strength of partisanship. Design/methodology/approach The study used a 2 (uncivil comments vs civil comments) × 2 (comments without supporting evidence vs comments with supporting evidence) factorial design with a scenario about reading similar viewpoints about the gun control issue in Facebook comments. Findings The results showed that compared to exposure to civil agreeing comments, exposure to uncivil likeminded comments resulted in higher levels of negative evaluations of the commenters, which in turn decreased willingness to participate in political activities online. Exposure to comments without evidence led to more negative evaluations of the commenters, but it did not significantly influence online political participation. In addition, the strength of partisanship did not significantly moderate the indirect effect of exposure to uncivil comments and comments without evidence on online political participation through evaluations of the commenters. Originality/value Although previous studies have demonstrated the significant effects of incivility and reasoned argument, little is known about whether and how people evaluate ingroup members' comments that are uncivil and lacking reasoned arguments. Most of these studies have examined incivility in political contexts, but few have extended the context to the effect of likeminded comments, especially when the comments are uncivil and lack supporting evidence. The current study aims to fill this gap in the literature.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
刚刚
1秒前
默默山槐完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
就叫柠檬吧应助Shennian采纳,获得10
6秒前
嘉123完成签到 ,获得积分10
8秒前
chen发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
Yummy发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
Lucas应助纯情的沛岚采纳,获得10
10秒前
复成完成签到 ,获得积分10
11秒前
满意的大碗完成签到,获得积分20
12秒前
可爱的函函应助123采纳,获得10
13秒前
13秒前
鱼人完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
默然回首完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
18秒前
oasis完成签到,获得积分10
19秒前
19秒前
FashionBoy应助PigUniver采纳,获得20
20秒前
落寞元霜发布了新的文献求助10
21秒前
不愿透露姓名科研人完成签到 ,获得积分10
21秒前
22秒前
JamesPei应助dengdeng采纳,获得10
24秒前
123发布了新的文献求助10
25秒前
28秒前
30秒前
包容的海豚完成签到 ,获得积分10
31秒前
31秒前
陶醉怜容完成签到,获得积分10
31秒前
huohuo发布了新的文献求助20
33秒前
34秒前
34秒前
zhu完成签到,获得积分10
36秒前
Leowooer发布了新的文献求助10
36秒前
科研兄发布了新的文献求助10
36秒前
37秒前
酷波er应助江幻天采纳,获得10
38秒前
默然回首发布了新的文献求助10
39秒前
木木三发布了新的文献求助10
39秒前
可爱绿草应助坛子采纳,获得10
40秒前
夜枫完成签到 ,获得积分10
41秒前
高分求助中
Encyclopedia of Mathematical Physics 2nd edition 888
Introduction to Strong Mixing Conditions Volumes 1-3 500
Tip60 complex regulates eggshell formation and oviposition in the white-backed planthopper, providing effective targets for pest control 400
Optical and electric properties of monocrystalline synthetic diamond irradiated by neutrons 320
共融服務學習指南 300
Essentials of Pharmacoeconomics: Health Economics and Outcomes Research 3rd Edition. by Karen Rascati 300
Peking Blues // Liao San 300
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 内科学 复合材料 物理化学 电极 遗传学 量子力学 基因 冶金 催化作用
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3802585
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3348257
关于积分的说明 10337318
捐赠科研通 3064235
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1682495
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 808168
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 764010