Shame on you! How incivility and absence of supporting evidence in likeminded Facebook comments influence evaluations of ingroup members and online political participation

无礼 社会心理学 羞耻 政治 心理学 内群和外群 论证(复杂分析) 背景(考古学) 政治学 法学 古生物学 生物化学 化学 生物
作者
Yonghwan Kim
出处
期刊:Online Information Review [Emerald (MCB UP)]
卷期号:48 (3): 619-643 被引量:4
标识
DOI:10.1108/oir-12-2021-0650
摘要

Purpose This study examined how likeminded Facebook comments with incivility and without supporting evidence influence readers' evaluations of the commenter and online political participation intention. This study also investigated whether the indirect effect of exposure to uncivil comments and comments without evidence on online political participation through evaluations of the commenters is contingent on the strength of partisanship. Design/methodology/approach The study used a 2 (uncivil comments vs civil comments) × 2 (comments without supporting evidence vs comments with supporting evidence) factorial design with a scenario about reading similar viewpoints about the gun control issue in Facebook comments. Findings The results showed that compared to exposure to civil agreeing comments, exposure to uncivil likeminded comments resulted in higher levels of negative evaluations of the commenters, which in turn decreased willingness to participate in political activities online. Exposure to comments without evidence led to more negative evaluations of the commenters, but it did not significantly influence online political participation. In addition, the strength of partisanship did not significantly moderate the indirect effect of exposure to uncivil comments and comments without evidence on online political participation through evaluations of the commenters. Originality/value Although previous studies have demonstrated the significant effects of incivility and reasoned argument, little is known about whether and how people evaluate ingroup members' comments that are uncivil and lacking reasoned arguments. Most of these studies have examined incivility in political contexts, but few have extended the context to the effect of likeminded comments, especially when the comments are uncivil and lack supporting evidence. The current study aims to fill this gap in the literature.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI

祝大家在新的一年里科研腾飞
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
无与伦比完成签到 ,获得积分10
刚刚
任泉如完成签到 ,获得积分10
刚刚
诗酒梦芳华完成签到 ,获得积分10
刚刚
1秒前
湛荏染发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
江南达尔贝完成签到 ,获得积分10
2秒前
象象完成签到 ,获得积分10
2秒前
午木完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
1111完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
Haho完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
x_x完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
lizishu应助cc251672采纳,获得50
8秒前
天阳完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
苗苗完成签到 ,获得积分10
9秒前
皑似山上雪完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
卡布达完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
licheng完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
不必要再讨论适合与否完成签到,获得积分0
11秒前
mryun完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
紧张的刺猬完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
儒雅的若翠完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
llk完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
怎么办完成签到 ,获得积分10
18秒前
宋宋不迷糊完成签到 ,获得积分10
18秒前
苗条白枫完成签到 ,获得积分10
19秒前
WHT完成签到,获得积分10
19秒前
玖Nine发布了新的文献求助10
20秒前
过奖啦完成签到,获得积分10
20秒前
ayaya完成签到,获得积分10
20秒前
cesar完成签到,获得积分10
20秒前
hhh完成签到 ,获得积分10
21秒前
fanch1122完成签到,获得积分10
21秒前
lambs13完成签到,获得积分10
21秒前
chris chen完成签到,获得积分0
24秒前
贪玩的秋柔完成签到,获得积分0
25秒前
虚拟的哲瀚完成签到 ,获得积分10
26秒前
27秒前
28秒前
引子完成签到,获得积分10
28秒前
29秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Les Mantodea de guyane 2500
Signals, Systems, and Signal Processing 510
Discrete-Time Signals and Systems 510
The Dance of Butch/Femme: The Complementarity and Autonomy of Lesbian Gender Identity 500
Driving under the influence: Epidemiology, etiology, prevention, policy, and treatment 500
Differentiation Between Social Groups: Studies in the Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations 350
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 生物 医学 工程类 计算机科学 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 复合材料 内科学 化学工程 人工智能 催化作用 遗传学 数学 基因 量子力学 物理化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 5876601
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 6534662
关于积分的说明 15678975
捐赠科研通 4995176
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2692087
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1634267
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1591981