亲爱的研友该休息了!由于当前在线用户较少,发布求助请尽量完整地填写文献信息,科研通机器人24小时在线,伴您度过漫漫科研夜!身体可是革命的本钱,早点休息,好梦!

Provider knowledge, beliefs, and self‐efficacy to deprescribe opioids and sedative‐hypnotics

医学 折旧 镇静剂 家庭医学 精神科 多药 重症监护医学
作者
Shelly L. Gray,Rachyl Fornaro,Justin P. Turner,Denise M. Boudreau,Robert Wellman,Cara Tannenbaum,Zachary A. Marcum,Benjamin H. Balderson,Andrea J. Cook,Anna Liss Jacobsen,Elizabeth A. Phelan
出处
期刊:Journal of the American Geriatrics Society [Wiley]
卷期号:71 (5): 1580-1586 被引量:8
标识
DOI:10.1111/jgs.18202
摘要

Abstract Background While many studies have assessed and measured patient attitudes toward deprescribing, less quantitative research has addressed the provider perspective. We thus sought to describe provider knowledge, beliefs, and self‐efficacy to deprescribe, with a focus on opioids and sedative‐hypnotics. Methods An electronic anonymous survey was distributed to primary care providers at Kaiser Permanente Washington. Two reminder emails were sent. The survey included 10 questions on general deprescribing, and six questions each specific to opioid and sedative‐hypnotic deprescribing. Knowledge questions used a multiple‐choice response option format. Questions addressing beliefs and self‐efficacy (i.e., confidence) used a 0–10 Likert scale. Scales were dichotomized at ≥7 to define agreement (belief questions) or confidence (self‐efficacy questions). We calculated descriptive statistics to summarize the responses. Results Of 370 eligible primary care providers, 95 (26%) completed the survey. For general deprescribing questions, a majority believed that lack of patient willingness, withdrawal symptoms and fear of symptom return, and time constraints impeded deprescribing. Approximately half chose the correct answers about opioid deprescribing, 21% were confident that they could alleviate patient concerns about opioid tapering, and 32% were confident managing chronic non‐cancer pain without opioids. For sedative‐hypnotics, 64%–87% of respondents correctly answered questions about risks and the relative effectiveness of alternatives, but only one‐third correctly answered a question about sedative‐hypnotic tapering. Roughly half were confident in their ability to successfully engage patients in sedative deprescribing conversations and select alternatives. Only 54% and 34% were confident in writing a tapering protocol for opioids and sedative‐hypnotics, respectively. Conclusion Results suggest that raising provider awareness of patient willingness to deprescribe, addressing knowledge gaps, and increasing self‐efficacy for deprescribing are important targets for improving deprescribing. Support for writing tapering protocols and prescribing evidence‐based drug and non‐drug alternatives may be important to improve care.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
隐形曼青应助深井的朵拉采纳,获得10
2秒前
4秒前
8秒前
9秒前
M1aMaey发布了新的文献求助20
13秒前
李健应助BigTong采纳,获得10
20秒前
小蘑菇应助lin采纳,获得10
21秒前
21秒前
DreamMaker完成签到,获得积分10
22秒前
赘婿应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
23秒前
赘婿应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
23秒前
华仔应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
23秒前
LAN完成签到,获得积分10
26秒前
M1aMaey发布了新的文献求助20
28秒前
lin完成签到,获得积分20
37秒前
乐乐应助lin采纳,获得10
41秒前
可爱的函函应助M1aMaey采纳,获得20
41秒前
阿明完成签到 ,获得积分10
50秒前
情怀应助M1aMaey采纳,获得20
55秒前
57秒前
BruceQ发布了新的文献求助30
59秒前
马思婕发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
Night完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
miaomiao123完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
1分钟前
ding应助无敌喷火龙采纳,获得10
1分钟前
M1aMaey发布了新的文献求助20
1分钟前
1分钟前
研友_VZG7GZ应助liangliu采纳,获得10
1分钟前
M1aMaey发布了新的文献求助20
1分钟前
生动的孤容完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
1分钟前
1分钟前
姚芭蕉完成签到 ,获得积分0
1分钟前
liujinjin完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
1分钟前
2分钟前
沉默洋洋发布了新的文献求助10
2分钟前
lin发布了新的文献求助10
2分钟前
2分钟前
高分求助中
Principles of Economics, 11th Edition 10000
University Physics with Modern Physics, 16th edition 10000
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Development of a Bridge Weigh-In-Motion System: A technology to convert the bridge response to the passage of traffic into data on vehicle configurations, speeds, times of travel and weights 1000
Molecular Mechanisms of Photosynthesis, 4th Edition 1000
Organic Reactions, Volume 116 1000
Current concepts in cutaneous toxicity : proceedings of the Fourth Conference on Cutaneous Toxicity, Washington, D.C., May 9-11, 1979 1000
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7263381
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8884523
关于积分的说明 18776902
捐赠科研通 6942006
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3202578
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2375722
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2178488