The efficacy and acceptability of psychological interventions for adult PTSD: A network and pairwise meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

心理干预 荟萃分析 随机对照试验 眼动脱敏与再处理 临床心理学 心理学 医学 创伤后应激 精神科 内科学
作者
Thole H. Hoppen,Marvin Jehn,Heinz Holling,Julian Mutz,Ahlke Kip,Nexhmedin Morina
出处
期刊:Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology [American Psychological Association]
卷期号:91 (8): 445-461 被引量:16
标识
DOI:10.1037/ccp0000809
摘要

A comprehensive quantitative summary of the efficacy and acceptability of psychological interventions (PIs) for adult posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is lacking.We conducted a systematic literature search to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) examining the efficacy and acceptability (all-cause dropout) of psychological interventions (i.e., trauma-focused cognitive behavior therapy [TF-CBT], eye movement desensitization and reprocessing [EMDR], other trauma-focused interventions and non-trauma-focused interventions).One hundred fifty-seven RCTs were included comprising 11,565 patients. Most research (64% of RCTs) accumulated for TF-CBT. In network meta-analyses, all therapies were effective when compared to control conditions. Interventions did not differ significantly in their efficacy. Yet, TF-CBT yielded higher short- (g = 0.17, 95% CI [0.03-0.31], number of comparisons kes = 190), mid- (i.e., ≤5 months posttreatment, g = 0.23, 95% CI [0.06-0.40], kes = 73) and long-term efficacy (i.e., >5 months posttreatment, g = 0.20, 95% CI [0.04-0.35], kes = 41) than non-trauma-focused interventions. There was some evidence of network inconsistencies, and heterogeneity in outcomes was large. In pairwise meta-analysis, slightly more patients dropped out from TF-CBT than non-trauma-focused interventions (RR = 1.36; 95% CI [1.08-1.70], kes = 22). Other than that, interventions did not differ in their acceptability.Interventions with and without trauma focus are effective and acceptable in the treatment of PTSD. While TF-CBT yields the highest efficacy, slightly more patients discontinued TF-CBT than non-trauma-focused interventions. Altogether, the present results align with results of most previous quantitative reviews. Yet, results need to be interpreted with caution in light of some network inconsistencies and high heterogeneity in outcomes. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
1秒前
3秒前
4秒前
CipherSage应助虚幻亦竹采纳,获得10
4秒前
史俊美完成签到 ,获得积分20
4秒前
4秒前
tumbler发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
清风慕竹发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
大个应助成就心锁采纳,获得10
6秒前
MY999完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
dui完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
Esty发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
Xyx发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
bkagyin应助黄辉冯采纳,获得10
9秒前
科研通AI5应助湛湛采纳,获得10
9秒前
steleegee发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
Lin关闭了Lin文献求助
10秒前
脑洞疼应助郑镲桂采纳,获得10
12秒前
冷酷瑾瑜完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
13秒前
斯文败类应助Xyx采纳,获得10
13秒前
14秒前
脑洞疼应助ZHAO采纳,获得10
15秒前
玮丶关注了科研通微信公众号
15秒前
16秒前
17秒前
Lucas应助ss采纳,获得10
18秒前
shuaixiaoyu完成签到,获得积分10
18秒前
19秒前
科研通AI5应助火星上初柳采纳,获得10
19秒前
丘比特应助tuetue采纳,获得10
20秒前
Rui发布了新的文献求助10
21秒前
23秒前
黄辉冯发布了新的文献求助10
23秒前
雪霁完成签到,获得积分10
23秒前
科研通AI5应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
25秒前
大模型应助科研通管家采纳,获得50
25秒前
青鸟应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
25秒前
李健应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
25秒前
xdx应助科研通管家采纳,获得20
25秒前
高分求助中
(禁止应助)【重要!!请各位详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
求polyinfo中的所有数据,主要要共聚物的,有偿。 1500
Mechanics of Composite Strengthening 1500
International Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plants (Madrid Code) (Regnum Vegetabile) 1500
Robot-supported joining of reinforcement textiles with one-sided sewing heads 800
水产动物免疫学 500
鱼类基因组学及基因组物种技术 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 遗传学 基因 物理化学 催化作用 冶金 细胞生物学 免疫学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 4176574
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3711838
关于积分的说明 11705529
捐赠科研通 3394692
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1862417
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 921170
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 833056