A comparative review of methane policies of the United States and China in the context of US – China climate cooperation

中国 背景(考古学) 气候政策 自然资源经济学 气候变化 国际贸易 政治学 经济 地理 生态学 考古 法学 生物
作者
Mengye Zhu,Steven J. Smith,Minpeng Chen,Meredydd Evans,Qimin Chai,Fei Teng,Pu Wang,Xinzhao Cheng,Wenli Li,Jenna Behrendt,Sha Yu,Sha Fu,Haiwen Zhang,Ryna Cui,Jiehong Lou,Manjyot Ahluwalia,Nathan Hultman,Yi Wang
出处
期刊:Climate Policy [Taylor & Francis]
卷期号:: 1-19 被引量:1
标识
DOI:10.1080/14693062.2024.2366902
摘要

Methane is a powerful greenhouse gas. The US and China are the world's two of the largest methane emitters and jointly committed to tackling this global challenge in the US–China Joint Glasgow Declaration at COP26 in 2021. However, few studies have revealed the methane policy landscape in the two countries. Greater understanding of these policies and how they have evolved is critical for enhancing future actions. We addressed important research topics currently understudied, including the types of policy instruments used, the commonalities and differences between the two countries in their primary policy foci, and the evolution and driving forces of methane policies. This study conducted a comprehensive and comparative review of methane-related governance structures and policy frameworks in both countries. We performed policy mapping based on systematic and large-scale policy document collection and screening, followed by an in-depth review of the development of methane policies in both countries. This study found that both countries placed uneven emphases across sectors, with a notable focus on the energy sector. While the US showed a preference for regulatory policy instruments such as acts, rules and regulations, China primarily utilized planning instruments such as Five-Year Plans (FYPs), notices, and working guidelines. Additionally, methane policies in both countries were largely driven by safety, resource utilization, and pollution concerns rather than reducing greenhouse gas emissions. Our study suggests that both countries should fill the policy gaps to accelerate their actions on methane mitigation and consider more climate-centric policies. It underlines the potential for US–China collaboration through the exchange of knowledge and best practices, which would also greatly advance global climate governance.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
2秒前
2秒前
粱踏歌发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
BrightForever完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
机智完成签到,获得积分20
4秒前
SYLH应助非而者厚采纳,获得10
5秒前
5秒前
华仔应助zsc采纳,获得10
7秒前
哎呦喂完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
7秒前
皮皮完成签到 ,获得积分10
9秒前
bian完成签到 ,获得积分10
9秒前
SYLH应助Yiy采纳,获得10
10秒前
duanhahaha完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
典雅涵瑶发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
科研通AI5应助整齐的豆芽采纳,获得10
11秒前
书生完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
yuchen发布了新的文献求助30
13秒前
13秒前
粱踏歌完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
17秒前
CodeCraft应助博修采纳,获得10
17秒前
Akim应助墨尔根戴青采纳,获得30
17秒前
18秒前
如意静白完成签到,获得积分10
19秒前
无与伦比完成签到,获得积分10
19秒前
呼啸37126完成签到,获得积分10
20秒前
zk完成签到,获得积分20
21秒前
依依发布了新的文献求助10
22秒前
24秒前
28秒前
28秒前
完美的如容关注了科研通微信公众号
28秒前
29秒前
30秒前
yuchen完成签到,获得积分10
30秒前
31秒前
31秒前
爱弥儿发布了新的文献求助20
32秒前
33秒前
高分求助中
Applied Survey Data Analysis (第三版, 2025) 800
Assessing and Diagnosing Young Children with Neurodevelopmental Disorders (2nd Edition) 700
Pteromalidae 600
Images that translate 500
Handbook of Innovations in Political Psychology 400
Mapping the Stars: Celebrity, Metonymy, and the Networked Politics of Identity 400
Nucleophilic substitution in azasydnone-modified dinitroanisoles 300
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 内科学 复合材料 物理化学 电极 遗传学 量子力学 基因 冶金 催化作用
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3842826
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3384821
关于积分的说明 10537552
捐赠科研通 3105393
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1710250
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 823571
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 774149