A comparative review of methane policies of the United States and China in the context of US – China climate cooperation

中国 背景(考古学) 气候政策 自然资源经济学 气候变化 国际贸易 政治学 经济 地理 生态学 生物 考古 法学
作者
Mengye Zhu,Steven J. Smith,Minpeng Chen,Meredydd Evans,Qimin Chai,Fei Teng,Pu Wang,Xinzhao Cheng,Wenli Li,Jenna Behrendt,Sha Yu,Sha Fu,Haiwen Zhang,Ryna Cui,Jiehong Lou,Manjyot Ahluwalia,Nathan Hultman,Yi Wang
出处
期刊:Climate Policy [Taylor & Francis]
卷期号:25 (2): 171-189 被引量:5
标识
DOI:10.1080/14693062.2024.2366902
摘要

Methane is a powerful greenhouse gas. The US and China are the world's two of the largest methane emitters and jointly committed to tackling this global challenge in the US–China Joint Glasgow Declaration at COP26 in 2021. However, few studies have revealed the methane policy landscape in the two countries. Greater understanding of these policies and how they have evolved is critical for enhancing future actions. We addressed important research topics currently understudied, including the types of policy instruments used, the commonalities and differences between the two countries in their primary policy foci, and the evolution and driving forces of methane policies. This study conducted a comprehensive and comparative review of methane-related governance structures and policy frameworks in both countries. We performed policy mapping based on systematic and large-scale policy document collection and screening, followed by an in-depth review of the development of methane policies in both countries. This study found that both countries placed uneven emphases across sectors, with a notable focus on the energy sector. While the US showed a preference for regulatory policy instruments such as acts, rules and regulations, China primarily utilized planning instruments such as Five-Year Plans (FYPs), notices, and working guidelines. Additionally, methane policies in both countries were largely driven by safety, resource utilization, and pollution concerns rather than reducing greenhouse gas emissions. Our study suggests that both countries should fill the policy gaps to accelerate their actions on methane mitigation and consider more climate-centric policies. It underlines the potential for US–China collaboration through the exchange of knowledge and best practices, which would also greatly advance global climate governance.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
方舟发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
感动的荠完成签到,获得积分20
刚刚
丘比特应助疯狂的化蛹采纳,获得10
刚刚
1秒前
牧野牧完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
洒脱一生发布了新的文献求助20
1秒前
2秒前
ICEY完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
oh777完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
Hello应助may采纳,获得10
2秒前
脑洞疼应助willa采纳,获得10
2秒前
2秒前
hhh完成签到 ,获得积分10
3秒前
研友_ZzrNpZ发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
3秒前
胖丁完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
kong发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
4秒前
烟花应助科研小小小白采纳,获得10
4秒前
儒雅的战斗机完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
英俊的羽毛完成签到,获得积分20
4秒前
4秒前
小二郎应助小刘爱科研采纳,获得10
5秒前
de完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
甜美折耳根完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
6秒前
Mumu完成签到,获得积分20
7秒前
utln完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
奥利给完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
8秒前
Sophia发布了新的文献求助30
8秒前
8秒前
Joshua发布了新的文献求助20
9秒前
oh777发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
hoshi完成签到 ,获得积分10
9秒前
CodeCraft应助help采纳,获得10
10秒前
明亮的嚣完成签到,获得积分20
11秒前
psybrain9527发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
田様应助搞怪的青旋采纳,获得10
11秒前
汝桢发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
高分求助中
Malcolm Fraser : a biography 700
Signals, Systems, and Signal Processing 610
天津市智库成果选编 600
Climate change and sports: Statistics report on climate change and sports 500
Forced degradation and stability indicating LC method for Letrozole: A stress testing guide 500
Organic Reactions Volume 118 400
A Foreign Missionary on the Long March: The Unpublished Memoirs of Arnolis Hayman of the China Inland Mission 400
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 物理 内科学 复合材料 催化作用 物理化学 光电子学 电极 细胞生物学 基因 无机化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6462785
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8270693
关于积分的说明 17631798
捐赠科研通 5534341
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2906789
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1883704
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1730348