物理疗法
针灸科
可视模拟标度
麻醉
生活质量(医疗保健)
外科
作者
In Heo,Byung-Cheul Shin,Jae-Heung Cho,In-Hyuk Ha,Eui-Hyoung Hwang,Junhwan Lee,Koh-Woon Kim,Me-riong Kim,So-Young Jung,Ojin Kwon,Nam-Kwen Kim,Dong Wuk Son,Kyung Min Shin
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.bja.2020.10.038
摘要
Abstract Background The purpose of this study was to investigate the effectiveness and safety between electroacupuncture (EA) combined with usual care (UC) and UC alone for pain reduction and functional improvement in patients with non-acute low back pain (LBP) after back surgery. Methods In this multicentre, randomised, assessor-blinded active-controlled trial, 108 participants were equally randomised to either the EA with UC or the UC alone. Participants in the EA with UC group received EA treatment and UC treatment twice a week for 4 weeks; those allocated to the UC group received only UC. The primary outcome was the VAS pain intensity score. The secondary outcomes were functional improvement (Oswestry Disability Index [ODI]) and the quality of life (EuroQol-5-dimension questionnaire [EQ-5D]). The outcomes were measured at Week 5. Results Significant reductions were observed in the VAS (mean difference [MD] –8.15; P=0.0311) and ODI scores (MD –3.98; P=0.0460) between two groups after 4 weeks of treatment. No meaningful differences were found in the EQ-5D scores and incidence of adverse events (AEs) between the groups. The reported AEs did not have a causal relationship with EA treatment. Conclusions The results showed that EA with UC treatment was more effective than UC alone and relatively safe in patients with non-acute LBP after back surgery. EA with UC treatment may be considered as an effective, integrated, conservative treatment for patients with non-acute LBP after back surgery. Clinical trial registration KCT0001939.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI