带宽遏流
液压马达
水力机械
控制阀
机械工程
工程类
气动学
气门座
阻力
旋转发动机
流量控制阀
执行机构
汽车工程
阀门执行机构
球阀
航空航天工程
电气工程
气体压缩机
作者
Grey Boyce-Erickson,Nathaniel J. Fulbright,John Voth,Thomas R. Chase,Perry Y. Li,James D. Van de Ven
标识
DOI:10.1115/fpmc2019-1687
摘要
Abstract A large variety of options for the internal valves of a hydraulic motor are available. Poppet valves, rotary valves, and port plates are common options, but each have drawbacks such as actuation force, complexity, leakage, or friction. An alternative type that is also common is spool valves. Spool valves require minimal actuation force and have low throttling losses if sized correctly. This paper compares two drive options for a mainstage spool valve: a hydraulic pilot from a rotary valve and mechanical actuation. Dynamic models of the two valve configurations are created to carry out design studies and evaluate the performance of the motor. Compressibility effects, viscous drag, and flow forces are included in the model. Simulations show that the rotary valve pilot operation causes an unacceptable lag in the motion of the spool that cannot be corrected without reducing performance when running in reverse. Furthermore, the rotary pilot stage drive results in the motor timing becoming retarded at higher operating speeds. For these reasons, mechanically actuated valves are preferred over pilot operated valves for hydraulic motors operated bi-directionally or across a wide speed range.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI