Prelabor screening at term using the cerebroplacental ratio and placental growth factor: a pragmatic randomized open-label phase 2 trial

Background and Objective In some women placental function may not be adequate to meet fetal growth requirements in late pregnancy or the additional demands during labor, thus predisposing these infants to intrapartum fetal compromise and subsequent serious morbidity and mortality. The objective of this study was to determine if the introduction of a prelabor screening test at term combining the cerebroplacental ratio and maternal placental growth factor level would result in a reduction in a composite of adverse outcomes. Study Design Single-site, nonblinded, randomized controlled trial conducted at a tertiary hospital in Brisbane, Australia. Eligible women were randomized to either receive the screening test performed between 37–38 weeks or routine obstetric care. Screen-positive women were offered induction of labor. The primary outcome was a composite of emergency cesarean delivery for nonreassuring fetal status (fetal distress) or severe neonatal acidosis or low Apgar score or stillbirth or neonatal death. Results Women were recruited and randomized (n = 501) between April 2017 and January 2019. Sixty-three of 249 subjects (25.3%) in the screened group compared to 56 of 252 (22.2%) in the control group experienced the primary outcome (relative risk = 1.14 [95% confidence interval, 0.83–1.56]; P = .418). Women who screened positive were more likely to require operative delivery for fetal distress, have meconium-stained liquor, have pathologic fetal heart rate abnormalities, and have infants with lower birthweight compared to women that screened negative. Conclusion The introduction of this test did not result in improvements in intrapartum intervention rates or neonatal outcomes. However, it did show discriminatory potential, and future research should focus on refining the thresholds used. In some women placental function may not be adequate to meet fetal growth requirements in late pregnancy or the additional demands during labor, thus predisposing these infants to intrapartum fetal compromise and subsequent serious morbidity and mortality. The objective of this study was to determine if the introduction of a prelabor screening test at term combining the cerebroplacental ratio and maternal placental growth factor level would result in a reduction in a composite of adverse outcomes. Single-site, nonblinded, randomized controlled trial conducted at a tertiary hospital in Brisbane, Australia. Eligible women were randomized to either receive the screening test performed between 37–38 weeks or routine obstetric care. Screen-positive women were offered induction of labor. The primary outcome was a composite of emergency cesarean delivery for nonreassuring fetal status (fetal distress) or severe neonatal acidosis or low Apgar score or stillbirth or neonatal death. Women were recruited and randomized (n = 501) between April 2017 and January 2019. Sixty-three of 249 subjects (25.3%) in the screened group compared to 56 of 252 (22.2%) in the control group experienced the primary outcome (relative risk = 1.14 [95% confidence interval, 0.83–1.56]; P = .418). Women who screened positive were more likely to require operative delivery for fetal distress, have meconium-stained liquor, have pathologic fetal heart rate abnormalities, and have infants with lower birthweight compared to women that screened negative. The introduction of this test did not result in improvements in intrapartum intervention rates or neonatal outcomes. However, it did show discriminatory potential, and future research should focus on refining the thresholds used.