事件(粒子物理)
确定性
计量经济学
精算学
一致性预测
统计
计算机科学
经济
心理学
数学
几何学
量子力学
物理
作者
Robert Mislavsky,Celia Gaertig
出处
期刊:Management Science
[Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences]
日期:2021-03-25
卷期号:68 (1): 541-563
被引量:9
标识
DOI:10.1287/mnsc.2020.3902
摘要
How do we combine others’ probability forecasts? Prior research has shown that when advisors provide numeric probability forecasts, people typically average them (i.e., they move closer to the average advisor’s forecast). However, what if the advisors say that an event is “likely” or “probable?” In eight studies (n = 7,334), we find that people are more likely to act as if they “count” verbal probabilities (i.e., they move closer to certainty than any individual advisor’s forecast) than they are to “count” numeric probabilities. For example, when the advisors both say an event is “likely,” participants will say that it is “very likely.” This effect occurs for both probabilities above and below 50%, for hypothetical scenarios and real events, and when presenting the others’ forecasts simultaneously or sequentially. We also show that this combination strategy carries over to subsequent consumer decisions that rely on advisors’ likelihood judgments. We discuss and rule out several candidate mechanisms for our effect. This paper was accepted by Yuval Rottenstreich, decision analysis.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI