相关性(法律)
计算机科学
数据科学
管理科学
统计假设检验
统计分析
风险分析(工程)
聚类分析
统计模型
健康衰老
适度
新兴技术
机器学习
人工智能
心理学
数据挖掘
统计思维
透明度(行为)
调解
作者
Deependra K. Thapa,Erik S. Parker,Mounika Kandukuri,Xi Rita Wang,Thirupathi R. Mokalla,Olivia C Robertson,Wasiuddin Najam,Andrew E. Teschendorff,Andrew W. Brown,John R. Speakman,Yisheng Peng,Bernard S. Gorman,Heping Zhang,Luis-Enrique Becerra-Garcia,Colby J. Vorland,David B. Allison
标识
DOI:10.1146/annurev-statistics-042324-060005
摘要
Aging research relies on varied statistical methods, and applying these methods appropriately is important for scientific rigor. However, proper use of these statistical techniques is a challenge. We discuss two categories of statistical methods in aging research: ( a ) emerging methods requiring further validation, including techniques to examine compression of morbidity, maximum lifespan, immortal time bias, molecular aging clocks, and treatment response heterogeneity, and ( b ) classic and existing methods needing reconsideration and improvement, such as stepwise regression, generalized linear models, methods for accounting for clustering and nesting effects, methods for testing for group differences, methods for mediation and moderation analyses, and nonlinear models. For each method, we review its relevance to aging research, highlight statistical issues, and suggest improvements or alternatives with examples from aging research. We urge researchers to refine traditional approaches and embrace emerging methods tailored to the unique challenges of aging research. This review will help researchers identify and apply sound statistical methods, thereby improving statistical rigor in aging research.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI