亲爱的研友该休息了!由于当前在线用户较少,发布求助请尽量完整的填写文献信息,科研通机器人24小时在线,伴您度过漫漫科研夜!身体可是革命的本钱,早点休息,好梦!

Relationship between monetary delay discounting and obesity: a systematic review and meta-regression

医学 心理信息 荟萃分析 逻辑回归 贴现 梅德林 斯科普斯 人口学 内科学 经济 生物 财务 生物化学 社会学
作者
Jianjun Tang,Oliver J. Chrzanowski‐Smith,George Hutchinson,Frank Kee,Ruth F. Hunter
出处
期刊:International Journal of Obesity [Springer Nature]
卷期号:43 (6): 1135-1146 被引量:38
标识
DOI:10.1038/s41366-018-0265-0
摘要

Previous studies have documented that high rates of delay discounting are associated with obesity. However, studies utilizing monetary reward experiments typically report no associations, as opposed to positive associations apparent in studies utilising food-reward experiments. Our objective was to investigate the reasons behind the mixed evidence from a methodological perspective using systematic review and meta-analytic methodologies.Seven databases (EMBASE, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Scopus, Web of Science, Econlit and IBSS) were systematically searched. Logistic meta-regression was applied to identify the determinants of a significant association and risk of bias was assessed using a modified form of the Newcastle Ottawa cohort scale.A total of 59 studies were identified, among which 29 studies (49.2%) found a significant positive association and 29 (49.2%) reported no association. A higher proportion of significant and positive associations was reported in those studies utilizing 'best-practice' methods (i.e. appropriate measurement models) to estimate monetary delay discounting (15/27; 55.6%) and incentive-compatible experiments (10/16; 62.5%) than those using non-'best-practice' methods (14/34; 41.2%) and hypothetical experiments (19/43; 44.2%). All five studies utilizing both 'best-practice' methods and incentive-compatible experiments generated a positive and significant relationship. Results from a logistic meta-regression also suggested that studies employing incentive-compatible experiments (OR: 4.38, 95% CI = 1.05-18.33, p value: 0.04), 'best-practice' methods (OR: 4.40, 95% CI = 0.88-22.99, p value: 0.07), parametric methods (OR: 3.36, 95% CI = 0.83-13.57, p value: 0.04), those conducted in children/adolescent populations (OR: 3.90, 95% CI = 0.85-17.88, p value: 0.08), and those with larger sample size (OR: 1.91, 95% CI = 1.15-3.18, p value: 0.01) tended to show positive and significant associations between delay discounting and obesity.This review suggests that the mixed evidence to date is a result of methodological heterogeneity, and that future studies should utilise 'best practice' methods.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
4秒前
7秒前
胡胡胡发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
zmd完成签到 ,获得积分10
11秒前
研友_Zzrx6Z发布了新的文献求助20
23秒前
小小鱼发布了新的文献求助10
29秒前
王二完成签到,获得积分10
31秒前
小小鱼完成签到,获得积分10
36秒前
皮老师发布了新的文献求助20
40秒前
45秒前
丸橙完成签到,获得积分10
47秒前
库里强发布了新的文献求助10
48秒前
丸橙发布了新的文献求助10
50秒前
51秒前
FashionBoy应助朴素的曼易采纳,获得10
54秒前
rerorero18完成签到,获得积分10
56秒前
56秒前
在水一方应助rerorero18采纳,获得10
58秒前
1分钟前
1分钟前
坦率邪欢发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
叽里呱啦完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
SciGPT应助003采纳,获得20
1分钟前
李某完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
SYLH应助ZhangYuan采纳,获得10
1分钟前
深情安青应助ZhangYuan采纳,获得10
1分钟前
1分钟前
啦啦啦发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
科目三应助坦率邪欢采纳,获得10
1分钟前
思源应助俭朴的滑板采纳,获得10
1分钟前
小二郎应助啦啦啦采纳,获得10
1分钟前
Jasper应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
1分钟前
桐桐应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
1分钟前
今后应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
1分钟前
1分钟前
俭朴的滑板完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
1分钟前
1分钟前
wang5945完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
丘比特应助丸橙采纳,获得10
1分钟前
高分求助中
Worked Bone, Antler, Ivory, and Keratinous Materials 1000
Algorithmic Mathematics in Machine Learning 500
Разработка метода ускоренного контроля качества электрохромных устройств 500
建筑材料检测与应用 370
Getting Published in SSCI Journals: 200+ Questions and Answers for Absolute Beginners 300
Advances in Underwater Acoustics, Structural Acoustics, and Computational Methodologies 300
The Monocyte-to-HDL ratio (MHR) as a prognostic and diagnostic biomarker in Acute Ischemic Stroke: A systematic review with meta-analysis (P9-14.010) 240
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 内科学 复合材料 物理化学 电极 遗传学 量子力学 基因 冶金 催化作用
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3830364
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3372779
关于积分的说明 10475199
捐赠科研通 3092539
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1702118
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 818797
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 771087