工作费
补贴
对话
政府(语言学)
工作(物理)
惩罚性赔偿
联合政府
社会学
公共关系
工资
公共行政
政治学
经济增长
经济
劳动经济学
政治
福利
法学
工程类
哲学
机械工程
沟通
语言学
标识
DOI:10.1177/14407833221114669
摘要
Australia's remote-focused ‘workfare’ program (Community Development Program, CDP) has produced overwhelmingly negative impacts, most of which have been borne by its ∼80% Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander participants. The Australian government has announced that CDP will end in 2023, though a replacement policy/program is not yet decided. Here, I bring three public proposals for replacement policies (wage subsidy, Job Guarantee, Liveable Income Guarantee) into conversation with one another, and compare these to the possibilities offered by a basic income. Drawing on documentary evidence, I discuss potential advantages and disadvantages of these alternatives, asking whether they might improve wellbeing and alleviate the harms experienced under CDP-style workfare.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI