医学
肺癌
倾向得分匹配
比例危险模型
内科学
置信区间
肿瘤科
前瞻性队列研究
生存分析
队列
外科
作者
Claudia I. Henschke,Rowena Yip,Qi Sun,Pengfei Li,Andrew Kaufman,Robert M. Samstein,Cliff P. Connery,Leslie J. Kohman,Paul Lee,Henry Tannous,David F. Yankelevitz,Emanuela Taioli,Kenneth E. Rosenzweig,Raja M. Flores,Raja M. Flores,Andrew Kaufman,Dong‐Seok Lee,Daniel Nicastri,Andrea Wolf,Kimberly J. Song
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.jtho.2023.10.002
摘要
Abstract
Introduction
We aimed to compare outcomes of patients with first primary clinical T1a-bN0M0 NSCLC treated with surgery or stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). Methods
We identified patients with first primary clinical T1a-bN0M0 NSCLCs on last pretreatment computed tomography treated by surgery or SBRT in the following two prospective cohorts: International Early Lung Cancer Action Program (I-ELCAP) and Initiative for Early Lung Cancer Research on Treatment (IELCART). Lung cancer-specific survival and all-cause survival after diagnosis were compared using Kaplan-Meier analysis. Propensity score matching was used to balance baseline demographics and comorbidities and analyzed using Cox proportional hazards regression. Results
Of 1115 patients with NSCLC, 1003 had surgery and 112 had SBRT; 525 in I-ELCAP in 1992 to 2021 and 590 in IELCART in 2016 to 2021. Median follow-up was 57.6 months. Ten-year lung cancer-specific survival was not significantly different: 90% (95% confidence interval: 87%–92%) for surgery versus 88% (95% confidence interval: 77%–99%) for SBRT, p = 0.55. Cox regression revealed no significant difference in lung cancer-specific survival for the combined cohorts (p = 0.48) or separately for I-ELCAP (p = 1.00) and IELCART (p = 1.00). Although 10-year all-cause survival was significantly different (75% versus 45%, p < 0.0001), after propensity score matching, all-cause survival using Cox regression was no longer different for the combined cohorts (p = 0.74) or separately for I-ELCAP (p = 1.00) and IELCART (p = 0.62). Conclusions
This first prospectively collected cohort analysis of long-term survival of small, early NSCLCs revealed that lung cancer-specific survival was high for both treatments and not significantly different (p = 0.48) and that all-cause survival after propensity matching was not significantly different (p = 0.74). This supports SBRT as an alternative treatment option for small, early NSCLCs which is especially important with their increasing frequency owing to low-dose computed tomography screening. Furthermore, treatment decisions are influenced by many different factors and should be personalized on the basis of the unique circumstances of each patient.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI