Neonatal outcomes for women at risk of preterm delivery given half dose versus full dose of antenatal betamethasone: a randomised, multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled, non-inferiority trial

医学 倍他米松 胎龄 安慰剂 呼吸窘迫 随机对照试验 妊娠期 临床终点 产科 中期分析 相对风险 怀孕 儿科 麻醉 置信区间 内科学 遗传学 替代医学 病理 生物
作者
Thomas Schmitz,Muriel Doret-Dion,Loı̈c Sentilhes,Olivier Parant,Olivier Claris,Laurent Renesme,Julie Abbal,A. Girault,Héloïse Torchin,Marie Houllier,Nolwenn Le Saché,Alexandre Vivanti,Danièle De Luca,Norbert Winer,Cyril Flamant,Claire Thuillier,Pascal Boileau,Julie Blanc,Véronique Brevaut,Pierre‐Emmanuel Bouet
出处
期刊:The Lancet [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:400 (10352): 592-604 被引量:48
标识
DOI:10.1016/s0140-6736(22)01535-5
摘要

Antenatal betamethasone is recommended before preterm delivery to accelerate fetal lung maturation. However, reports of growth and neurodevelopmental dose-related side-effects suggest that the current dose (12 mg plus 12 mg, 24 h apart) might be too high. We therefore investigated whether a half dose would be non-inferior to the current full dose for preventing respiratory distress syndrome.We designed a randomised, multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled, non-inferiority trial in 37 level 3 referral perinatal centres in France. Eligible participants were pregnant women aged 18 years or older with a singleton fetus at risk of preterm delivery and already treated with the first injection of antenatal betamethasone (11·4 mg) before 32 weeks' gestation. We used a computer-generated code producing permuted blocks of varying sizes to randomly assign (1:1) women to receive either a placebo (half-dose group) or a second 11·4 mg betamethasone injection (full-dose group) 24 h later. Randomisation was stratified by gestational age (before or after 28 weeks). Participants, clinicians, and study staff were masked to the treatment allocation. The primary outcome was the need for exogenous intratracheal surfactant within 48 h after birth. Non-inferiority would be shown if the higher limit of the 95% CI for the between-group difference between the half-dose and full-dose groups in the primary endpoint was less than 4 percentage points (corresponding to a maximum relative risk of 1·20). Four interim analyses monitoring the primary and the secondary safety outcomes were done during the study period, using a sequential data analysis method that provided futility and non-inferiority stopping rules and checked for type I and II errors. Interim analyses were done in the intention-to-treat population. This trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02897076.Between Jan 2, 2017, and Oct 9, 2019, 3244 women were randomly assigned to the half-dose (n=1620 [49·9%]) or the full-dose group (n=1624 [50·1%]); 48 women withdrew consent, 30 fetuses were stillborn, 16 neonates were lost to follow-up, and 9 neonates died before evaluation, so that 3141 neonates remained for analysis. In the intention-to-treat analysis, the primary outcome occurred in 313 (20·0%) of 1567 neonates in the half-dose group and 276 (17·5%) of 1574 neonates in the full-dose group (risk difference 2·4%, 95% CI -0·3 to 5·2); thus non-inferiority was not shown. The per-protocol analysis also did not show non-inferiority (risk difference 2·2%, 95% CI -0·6 to 5·1). No between-group differences appeared in the rates of neonatal death, grade 3-4 intraventricular haemorrhage, stage ≥2 necrotising enterocolitis, severe retinopathy of prematurity, or bronchopulmonary dysplasia.Because non-inferiority of the half-dose compared with the full-dose regimen was not shown, our results do not support practice changes towards antenatal betamethasone dose reduction.French Ministry of Health.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
慕青应助makabaka采纳,获得10
刚刚
1秒前
彭于晏应助GQ采纳,获得10
1秒前
研友_VZG7GZ应助xinxin采纳,获得10
1秒前
Lareina发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
yh完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
小白完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
3秒前
雪山飞龙发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
6秒前
Rainnnn完成签到 ,获得积分10
7秒前
7秒前
迟到翘课翘完成签到 ,获得积分10
7秒前
8秒前
8秒前
嗡嗡嗡嗡嗡嗡完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
Wanfeng完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
10秒前
jason0023发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
小乖乖永远在路上完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
11秒前
11秒前
12秒前
maguodrgon发布了新的文献求助30
13秒前
14秒前
侯长秀完成签到 ,获得积分10
14秒前
14秒前
15秒前
雪山飞龙发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
17秒前
ai发布了新的文献求助10
17秒前
18秒前
常威正在打来福完成签到,获得积分10
19秒前
19秒前
20秒前
哈哈发布了新的文献求助10
21秒前
22秒前
科研通AI6.2应助XX橙采纳,获得10
23秒前
23秒前
23秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
HYDROLYSE ACIDE DE QUELQUES DIOXASPIROCYCLANES 1314
Essentials of Carbohydrate Chemistry and Biochemistry, 4th Edition 800
Navigating Normative Orders. Interdisciplinary Perspectives 800
1 Peter and Christ's Descent to the Dead in Its Early Christian Reception 700
Organizational Behavior 510
Management and the Arts 510
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7747950
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9296180
关于积分的说明 20233931
捐赠科研通 7329325
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3308744
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2460530
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2320713