操作化
概念化
心理干预
康复
国际功能、残疾和健康分类
包裹体(矿物)
老年学
心理学
干预(咨询)
定性研究
医学
物理疗法
精神科
社会心理学
计算机科学
认识论
社会科学
哲学
社会学
人工智能
作者
Kristina M. Kokorelias,Shawna Cronin,Sarah Munce,Parvin Eftekhar,Katherine S. McGilton,Shirin Vellani,Tracey J. F. Colella,Pia Kontos,Alisa Grigorovich,Andrea D Furlan,Nancy M. Salbach,Susan Jaglal,Brian Chan,Jill I. Cameron
标识
DOI:10.1080/09638288.2021.2012844
摘要
Purpose: We aimed to synthesize the literature that considered frailty in the evaluation of rehabilitation interventions for adults (aged ≥18) by answering: (1) how is frailty defined in rehabilitation intervention research?; (2) how is frailty operationalized in rehabilitation intervention research?; (3) what are the characteristics of rehabilitation interventions for frail adults and what frailty related outcomes are assessed?Materials and methods: A scoping review was conducted. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and qualitative content analysis.Results: 53 articles met the inclusion criteria. Most studies were conducted in Europe and involved randomized control trials. The included studies reported on rehabilitation interventions that only included individuals aged 50 or older. Thirteen studies used Fried's definition of frailty, but most (n = 27) did not use any definition. Many studies did not differentiate between the conceptualization (e.g., definition) and operationalization (e.g., use of inclusion/exclusion criteria, outcome measures) of frailty. Most interventions focused on exercise. Instrumental activities of daily living reported most frequently as outcomes (n = 11).Conclusions: There is an absence of consistent definitions of frailty in rehabilitation interventions and current definitions tend to focus on physical functioning. The authors suggest rehabilitation researchers consider an expanded definition of frailty informed by the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health framework.IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONRehabilitation professionals should use an expanded definition of frailty, informed by the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health framework, should include physical, mental, personal, environmental, and social factors to decrease, delay, or prevent frailty in adults.Rehabilitation professionals should consider a broader operationalization of frailty that is not dependent on age and physical functioning.Rehabilitation professionals that consider a broader conceptualization of frailty should tailor interventions to the specific needs of frail adults.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI