独创性
陶伦斯创意思维测验
创造力
考试(生物学)
心理学
自然语言处理
人工智能
认知心理学
计算机科学
社会心理学
生物
古生物学
作者
Selçuk Acar,Kelly Berthiaume,Katalin Grajzel,Denis Dumas,Charles “Tedd” Flemister,Peter Organisciak
标识
DOI:10.1177/00169862211061874
摘要
In this study, we applied different text-mining methods to the originality scoring of the Unusual Uses Test (UUT) and Just Suppose Test (JST) from the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking (TTCT)–Verbal. Responses from 102 and 123 participants who completed Form A and Form B, respectively, were scored using three different text-mining methods. The validity of these scoring methods was tested against TTCT’s manual-based scoring and a subjective snapshot scoring method. Results indicated that text-mining systems are applicable to both UUT and JST items across both forms and students’ performance on those items can predict total originality and creativity scores across all six tasks in the TTCT-Verbal. Comparatively, the text-mining methods worked better for UUT than JST. Of the three text-mining models we tested, the Global Vectors for Word Representation (GLoVe) model produced the most reliable and valid scores. These findings indicate that creativity assessment can be done quickly and at a lower cost using text-mining approaches.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI