The social advantage of miscalibrated individuals: The relationship between social class and overconfidence and its implications for class-based inequality.

心理学 过度自信效应 社会阶层 社会心理学 类层次结构 社会分层 地位获得 社会经济地位 能力(人力资源) 社会流动性 社会学 人口 法学 程序设计语言 人口学 面向对象程序设计 计算机科学 社会科学 政治学
作者
Peter Belmi,Margaret A. Neale,David Reiff,Rosemary Ulfe
出处
期刊:Journal of Personality and Social Psychology [American Psychological Association]
卷期号:118 (2): 254-282 被引量:96
标识
DOI:10.1037/pspi0000187
摘要

[Correction Notice: An Erratum for this article was reported online in Journal of Personality and Social Psychology on Jul 8 2019 (see record 2019-40421-001). In the article, the first sentence in the Social class, perceived competence, and status attainment section is incorrect due to a printer error and should read instead as follows: Hypothesis 4 predicted that relative to individuals with lower social class, individuals with relatively high social class would be more overconfident, which in turn, would be associated with higher competence ratings, and ultimately, higher hiring ratings. All versions of this article have been corrected.] Understanding how socioeconomic inequalities perpetuate is a central concern among social and organizational psychologists. Drawing on a collection of findings suggesting that different social class contexts have powerful effects on people's sense of self, we propose that social class shapes the beliefs that people hold about their abilities, and that this, in turn, has important implications for how status hierarchies perpetuate. We first hypothesize that compared with individuals with relatively low social class, individuals with relatively high social class are more overconfident. Then, drawing on research suggesting that overconfidence can confer social advantages, we further hypothesize that the overconfidence of higher class individuals can help perpetuate the existing class hierarchy: It can provide them a path to social advantage by making them appear more competent in the eyes of others. We test these ideas in four large studies with a combined sample of 152,661 individuals. Study 1, a large field study featuring small-business owners from Mexico, found evidence that individuals with relatively high social class are more overconfident compared with their lower-class counterparts. Study 2, a multiwave study in the United States, replicated this result and further shed light on the underlying mechanism: Individuals with relatively high (vs. low) social class tend to be more overconfident because they have a stronger desire to achieve high social rank. Study 3 replicated these findings in a high-powered, preregistered study and found that individuals with relatively high social class were more overconfident, even in a task in which they had no performance advantages. Study 4, a multiphase study that featured a mock job interview in the laboratory, found that compared with their lower-class counterparts, higher-class individuals were more overconfident; overconfidence, in turn, made them appear more competent and more likely to attain social rank. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
刚刚
坚强冰枫的应助被七点采纳,获得10
1秒前
陈cc完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
想的美完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
伟伟完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
上官若男的应助被酤贳采纳,获得10
4秒前
Kyrie 11发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
笨笨袁绍发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
6秒前
凌晨驳回了华仔的应助
6秒前
7秒前
无极微光的应助被Froid采纳,获得20
7秒前
8秒前
谢伊代发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
8秒前
9秒前
今后的应助被薯条采纳,获得10
9秒前
科研通AI6.4的应助被icerain采纳,获得10
9秒前
10秒前
10秒前
灵巧忆枫完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
zero1832发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
11秒前
chenxi完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
11秒前
蔚蓝完成签到 ,获得积分10
12秒前
CodeCraft的应助被greenren采纳,获得10
12秒前
123发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
王诗涵发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
13秒前
郑琦敏钰发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
高高高发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
小二郎的应助被He采纳,获得10
14秒前
palpitate发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
九九不离十完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
16秒前
16秒前
韶邑发布了新的文献求助10
17秒前
李爱国的应助被科研通管家采纳,获得10
17秒前
共享精神的应助被科研通管家采纳,获得10
17秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Energie-Contracting 1500
Klimaschutzrecht durch den Energiesektor im Mehrebenensystem – Ein Rechtsvergleich 1000
Stochastic Models in Operations Research,Vol. 2 600
Critical Bildung: Hegel and the Logic of Diremption 500
桑白皮エキスの実験的, 臨床的育毛効果について 500
Qualitative Methodologies in Tourism Studies: Disrupting and Co-creating Critical Research 350
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 计算机科学 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 物理 复合材料 内科学 催化作用 光电子学 人工智能 细胞生物学 无机化学 物理化学 数学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 8038752
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9473648
关于积分的说明 21267362
捐赠科研通 7607815
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3390736
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2522337
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2428234