A framework for understanding artificial intelligence research: insights from practice

独创性 断开 计算机科学 领域(数学) 价值(数学) 感知 透视图(图形) 知识管理 人工智能应用 实证研究 数据科学 人工智能 管理科学 心理学 工程类 社会学 定性研究 政治学 认识论 社会科学 神经科学 数学 纯数学 法学 哲学 机器学习
作者
Ransome Epie Bawack,Samuel Fosso Wamba,Kévin Carillo
出处
期刊:Journal of Enterprise Information Management [Emerald Publishing Limited]
卷期号:34 (2): 645-678 被引量:89
标识
DOI:10.1108/jeim-07-2020-0284
摘要

Purpose The current evolution of artificial intelligence (AI) practices and applications is creating a disconnection between modern-day information system (IS) research and practices. The purpose of this study is to propose a classification framework that connects the IS discipline to contemporary AI practices. Design/methodology/approach We conducted a review of practitioner literature to derive our framework's key dimensions. We reviewed 103 documents on AI published by 25 leading technology companies ranked in the 2019 list of Fortune 500 companies. After that, we reviewed and classified 110 information system (IS) publications on AI using our proposed framework to demonstrate its ability to classify IS research on AI and reveal relevant research gaps. Findings Practitioners have adopted different definitional perspectives of AI (field of study, concept, ability, system), explaining the differences in the development, implementation and expectations from AI experienced today. All these perspectives suggest that perception, comprehension, action and learning are the four capabilities AI artifacts must possess. However, leading IS journals have mostly published research adopting the “AI as an ability” perspective of AI with limited theoretical and empirical studies on AI adoption, use and impact. Research limitations/implications First, the framework is based on the perceptions of AI by a limited number of companies, although it includes all the companies leading current AI practices. Secondly, the IS literature reviewed is limited to a handful of journals. Thus, the conclusions may not be generalizable. However, they remain true for the articles reviewed, and they all come from well-respected IS journals. Originality/value This is the first study to consider the practitioner's AI perspective in designing a conceptual framework for AI research classification. The proposed framework and research agenda are used to show how IS could become a reference discipline in contemporary AI research.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
wbbb完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
姜小猪发布了新的文献求助30
1秒前
高贵烧鹅完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
zyf完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
若俗人完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
土豆完成签到 ,获得积分10
6秒前
槿曦完成签到 ,获得积分10
7秒前
10秒前
姜小猪完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
王少杰完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
棈棦完成签到 ,获得积分10
14秒前
郭医生完成签到 ,获得积分10
15秒前
arniu2008发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
cml完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
Zhangll完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
wwwang完成签到 ,获得积分10
18秒前
September完成签到,获得积分10
20秒前
ZR666完成签到 ,获得积分10
21秒前
仙女完成签到 ,获得积分10
22秒前
虚心的冰巧完成签到,获得积分10
22秒前
科研通AI6.2应助spring采纳,获得10
23秒前
lilylwy完成签到 ,获得积分0
23秒前
拿铁小笼包完成签到,获得积分10
24秒前
dongge完成签到,获得积分10
24秒前
lvlulu21完成签到,获得积分10
25秒前
26秒前
漂亮访云完成签到,获得积分10
26秒前
开心诗珊完成签到,获得积分10
27秒前
你豪哥完成签到,获得积分10
28秒前
5999完成签到 ,获得积分10
29秒前
Atlantis完成签到,获得积分10
29秒前
29秒前
铃兰发布了新的文献求助10
29秒前
科研通AI6.2应助溟夔蝶魅采纳,获得10
29秒前
nanosci完成签到,获得积分10
29秒前
朵朵完成签到,获得积分10
30秒前
于与鱼完成签到,获得积分10
31秒前
学术牛马完成签到,获得积分10
32秒前
梦追阳完成签到 ,获得积分10
33秒前
三七二十一完成签到 ,获得积分10
34秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Essentials of Carbohydrate Chemistry and Biochemistry, 4th Edition 800
Navigating Normative Orders. Interdisciplinary Perspectives 800
1 Peter and Christ's Descent to the Dead in Its Early Christian Reception 700
Organizational Behavior 510
Management and the Arts 510
Matrix Methods in Data Mining and Pattern Recognition Second Edition 510
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7750024
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9297649
关于积分的说明 20241402
捐赠科研通 7331534
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3309487
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2461104
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2321840