Large-Scale Group Decision Making: A Systematic Review and a Critical Analysis

计算机科学 过程(计算) 管理科学 比例(比率) 质量(理念) 决策分析 数据科学 群体决策 决策支持系统 决策工程 商业决策图 选择(遗传算法) 运筹学 数据挖掘 人工智能 心理学 工程类 数学 社会心理学 哲学 统计 物理 认识论 量子力学 操作系统
作者
Diego García‐Zamora,Álvaro Labella,Weiping Ding,Rosa M. Rodríguez,Luis Martı́nez
出处
期刊:IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica [Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers]
卷期号:9 (6): 949-966 被引量:140
标识
DOI:10.1109/jas.2022.105617
摘要

The society in the digital transformation era demands new decision schemes such as e-democracy or based on social media. Such novel decision schemes require the participation of many experts/decision makers/stakeholders in the decision processes. As a result, large-scale group decision making (LSGDM) has attracted the attention of many researchers in the last decade and many studies have been conducted in order to face the challenges associated with the topic. Therefore, this paper aims at reviewing the most relevant studies about LSGDM, identifying the most profitable research trends and analyzing them from a critical point of view. To do so, the Web of Science database has been consulted by using different searches. From these results a total of 241 contributions were found and a selection process regarding language, type of contribution and actual relation with the studied topic was then carried out. The 87 contributions finally selected for this review have been analyzed from four points of view that have been highly remarked in the topic, such as the preference structure in which decision-makers' opinions are modeled, the group decision rules used to define the decision making process, the techniques applied to verify the quality of these models and their applications to real world problems solving. Afterwards, a critical analysis of the main limitations of the existing proposals is developed. Finally, taking into account these limitations, new research lines for LSGDM are proposed and the main challenges are stressed out.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
英俊的铭应助八花采纳,获得10
1秒前
1秒前
1秒前
1秒前
迎松完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
xyz发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
斯文败类应助迷你的绝义采纳,获得10
2秒前
小白完成签到 ,获得积分10
2秒前
Hustic完成签到 ,获得积分10
3秒前
邓欣宜完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
韭菜盒子完成签到,获得积分20
3秒前
Ann完成签到,获得积分20
4秒前
4秒前
呆毛发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
陶玟霖发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
Bonnie完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
4秒前
mao完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
5秒前
陈小白完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
禾禾完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
田様应助zhaozixuan采纳,获得20
5秒前
Mojito完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
6秒前
拾叶发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
谢雷XIELei应助追寻的巧曼采纳,获得30
7秒前
8秒前
lucky完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
周钰波完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
9秒前
爱撒娇的皓轩完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
10秒前
十三完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
全黑完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
11秒前
CodeCraft应助fffff采纳,获得10
11秒前
Zxx完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
12秒前
justiceyzh发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
无花果应助xyz采纳,获得10
12秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Essentials of Carbohydrate Chemistry and Biochemistry, 4th Edition 800
Navigating Normative Orders. Interdisciplinary Perspectives 800
1 Peter and Christ's Descent to the Dead in Its Early Christian Reception 700
Organizational Behavior 510
Management and the Arts 510
Matrix Methods in Data Mining and Pattern Recognition Second Edition 510
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7750236
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9297885
关于积分的说明 20243085
捐赠科研通 7331999
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3309594
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2461167
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2321977