观点
医学
肝移植
背景(考古学)
结果(博弈论)
透视图(图形)
重症监护医学
移植
梅德林
外科
计算机科学
法学
人工智能
政治学
艺术
古生物学
数学
数理经济学
视觉艺术
生物
作者
Stacey Rolak,Ahmed Elhawary,Tayyab S. Diwan,Kymberly D. Watt
标识
DOI:10.1097/lvt.0000000000000331
摘要
The term "futility" in liver transplantation is used inappropriately and inaccurately, as it is frequently applied to patient populations with suboptimal outcomes that are often not truly "futile." The term "futile" is used interchangeably with poor outcomes. Not all poor outcomes fulfill a definition of futility when considering all viewpoints. Definitions of "futility" are variable throughout the medical literature. We review futility in the context of liver transplantation, encompassing various viewpoints, with a goal to propose focused outcome definitions, including futility, that encompass broader viewpoints, and improve the utilization of "futility" to truly futile situations, and improve communication between providers and patients/families. Focused, appropriate definitions will help the transplant community develop better models to more accurately predict and avoid futile transplants, and better predict an individual patient's posttransplant outcome.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI