医学
彭布罗利珠单抗
打开标签
肿瘤科
内科学
随机对照试验
免疫疗法
癌症
作者
Byoung Chul Cho,Jong Seok Lee,Yi‐Long Wu,İrfan Çiçin,Manuel Cobo,Myung‐Ju Ahn,Kristof Cuppens,Rémi Veillon,Ernest Nadal,Josiane Mourão Dias,Claudio Martín,Martin Reck,Edward B. Garon,Enriqueta Felip,Luis Paz‐Ares,F. Mornex,Everett E. Vokes,Alex A. Adjei,Clifford G. Robinson,Masashi Sato
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.jtho.2023.08.018
摘要
Abstract
Introduction
Bintrafusp alfa, a first-in-class bifunctional fusion protein composed of the extracellular domain of TGF-βRII (a TGF-β "trap") fused to a human immunoglobulin G1 monoclonal antibody blocking programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1), has exhibited clinical activity in a phase 1 expansion cohort of patients with PD-L1–high advanced NSCLC. Methods
This adaptive phase 3 trial (NCT03631706) compared the efficacy and safety of bintrafusp alfa versus pembrolizumab as first-line treatment in patients with PD-L1–high advanced NSCLC. Primary end points were progression-free survival according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 per independent review committee and overall survival. Results
Patients (N = 304) were randomized one-to-one to receive either bintrafusp alfa or pembrolizumab (n = 152 each). The median follow-up was 14.3 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 13.1–16.0 mo) for bintrafusp alfa and 14.5 months (95% CI: 13.1–15.9 mo) for pembrolizumab. Progression-free survival by independent review committee was not significantly different between bintrafusp alfa and pembrolizumab arms (median = 7.0 mo [95% CI: 4.2 mo–not reached (NR)] versus 11.1 mo [95% CI: 8.1 mo–NR]; hazard ratio = 1.232 [95% CI: 0.885–1.714]). The median overall survival was 21.1 months (95% CI: 21.1 mo–NR) for bintrafusp alfa and 22.1 months (95% CI: 20.4 mo–NR) for pembrolizumab (hazard ratio = 1.201 [95% CI: 0.796–1.811]). Treatment-related adverse events were higher with bintrafusp alfa versus pembrolizumab; grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 42.4% versus 13.2% of patients, respectively. The study was discontinued at an interim analysis as it was unlikely to meet the primary end point. Conclusions
First-line treatment with bintrafusp alfa did not exhibit superior efficacy compared with pembrolizumab in patients with PD-L1–high, advanced NSCLC.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI