Higher versus lower nasal continuous positive airway pressure for extubation of extremely preterm infants in Australia (ÉCLAT): a multicentre, randomised, superiority trial

医学 持续气道正压 机械通风 气道 麻醉 随机对照试验 通风(建筑) 呼吸衰竭 儿科 外科 工程类 机械工程 阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停
作者
Anna Madeline Kidman,Brett J. Manley,Rosemarie A. Boland,Anil K. Malhotra,Susan Donath,Friederike Beker,Peter G. Davis,Risha Bhatia
出处
期刊:The Lancet Child & Adolescent Health [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:7 (12): 844-851 被引量:22
标识
DOI:10.1016/s2352-4642(23)00235-3
摘要

Extremely preterm infants often require invasive mechanical ventilation, and clinicians aim to extubate these infants as soon as possible. However, extubation failure occurs in up to 60% of extremely preterm infants and is associated with increased mortality and morbidity. Nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP) is the most common post-extubation respiratory support, but there is no consensus on the optimal nCPAP level to safely avoid extubation failure in extremely preterm infants. We aimed to determine if higher nCPAP levels compared with standard nCPAP levels would decrease rates of extubation failure in extremely preterm infants within 7 days of their first extubation.In this multicentre, randomised, open-label controlled trial done at three tertiary perinatal centres in Australia, we assigned extremely preterm infants to extubation to either higher nCPAP (10 cmH2O) or standard nCPAP (7 cmH2O). Infants were eligible if they were born at less than 28 weeks' gestation, were receiving mechanical ventilation via an endotracheal tube, and were being extubated for the first time to nCPAP. Eligible infants must have received previous treatment with exogenous surfactant and caffeine. Infants were ineligible if they were planned to be extubated to a mode of respiratory support other than nCPAP, if they had a known major congenital anomaly that might affect breathing, or if ongoing intensive care was not being provided. Parents or guardians provided prospective, written, informed consent. Infants were maintained within an assigned nCPAP range for a minimum of 24 h after extubation (higher nCPAP group 9-11 cmH2O and standard nCPAP group 6-8 cmH2O). Randomisation was stratified by both gestation (22-25 completed weeks or 26-27 completed weeks) and recruiting centre. The primary outcome was extubation failure within 7 days and analysis was by intention to treat. This trial was prospectively registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, number ACTRN12618001638224.Between March 3, 2019, and July 31, 2022, 483 infants were born at less than 28 weeks and admitted to the recruiting centres. 92 infants were not eligible, 172 were not approached, 65 families declined to participate, and 15 consented but were not randomly assigned. 139 infants were enrolled and randomly assigned, 70 to the higher nCPAP group and 69 to the standard nCPAP group. One infant in the higher nCPAP group was excluded from the analysis because consent was withdrawn after randomisation. 104 (75%) of 138 mothers were White. The mean gestation was 25·7 weeks (SD 1·3) and the mean birthweight was 777 grams (201). 70 (51%) of 138 infants were female. Extubation failure occurred in 24 (35%) of 69 infants in the higher nCPAP group and in 39 (57%) of 69 infants in the standard nCPAP group (risk difference -21·7%, 95% CI -38·5% to -3·7%). There were no significant differences in rates of adverse events between groups during the primary outcome period. Three patients died (two in the higher nCPAP group and one in the standard nCPAP group), pneumothorax occurred in one patient from each group, spontaneous intestinal perforation in three patients (two in the higher nCPAP group and one in the standard nCPAP group) and there were no events of pulmonary interstitial emphysema.Extubation of extremely preterm infants to higher nCPAP significantly reduced extubation failure compared with extubation to standard nCPAP, without increasing rates of adverse effects. Future larger trials are essential to confirm these findings in terms of both efficacy and safety.National Health and Medical Research Council Centre for Research Excellence in Newborn Medicine, number 1153176.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
1秒前
小陈买房发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
1秒前
默默百招发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
Morgen完成签到,获得积分20
2秒前
2秒前
4秒前
慢慢发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
深情安青应助chengzi采纳,获得10
4秒前
大模型应助独特的易形采纳,获得10
5秒前
6秒前
vvv发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
7秒前
wanci应助啊哦采纳,获得10
8秒前
科研通AI6.4应助麦兜采纳,获得10
8秒前
Copyright应助追风少年采纳,获得10
9秒前
murphy发布了新的文献求助30
9秒前
9秒前
9秒前
10秒前
隐形平蓝完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
义气睿渊发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
xiang完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
李爱国应助shidewu采纳,获得10
13秒前
17秒前
18秒前
ljlwh完成签到 ,获得积分10
19秒前
天天快乐应助shidewu采纳,获得10
19秒前
科研通AI6.3应助sx采纳,获得10
20秒前
20秒前
酷波er应助睿0924采纳,获得10
21秒前
可爱的函函应助宁益枭采纳,获得10
21秒前
21秒前
22秒前
22秒前
22秒前
24秒前
24秒前
25秒前
太阳当空照完成签到 ,获得积分10
26秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
日本現代怪異事典 副読本 700
Concise Introduction to Heritage Studies 650
悉尼大学博士学位论文,题目:Modelling and testing of one-sided stitched laminated composites. 作者:Kristopher P. Plain 650
Machine Learning for Asset Management and Pricing 600
Numerical analysis of the coupled atmosphere-ocean models (CAO II). II 600
Models for the coupled atmosphere and ocean 600
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7381264
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8988646
关于积分的说明 19119188
捐赠科研通 7020600
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3226968
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2390116
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2207850