清晨好,您是今天最早来到科研通的研友!由于当前在线用户较少,发布求助请尽量完整地填写文献信息,科研通机器人24小时在线,伴您科研之路漫漫前行!

Higher versus lower nasal continuous positive airway pressure for extubation of extremely preterm infants in Australia (ÉCLAT): a multicentre, randomised, superiority trial

医学 持续气道正压 机械通风 气道 麻醉 随机对照试验 通风(建筑) 呼吸衰竭 儿科 外科 机械工程 工程类 阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停
作者
Anna Madeline Kidman,Brett J. Manley,Rosemarie A. Boland,Anil K. Malhotra,Susan Donath,Friederike Beker,Peter G. Davis,Risha Bhatia
出处
期刊:The Lancet Child & Adolescent Health [Elsevier]
卷期号:7 (12): 844-851 被引量:22
标识
DOI:10.1016/s2352-4642(23)00235-3
摘要

Extremely preterm infants often require invasive mechanical ventilation, and clinicians aim to extubate these infants as soon as possible. However, extubation failure occurs in up to 60% of extremely preterm infants and is associated with increased mortality and morbidity. Nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP) is the most common post-extubation respiratory support, but there is no consensus on the optimal nCPAP level to safely avoid extubation failure in extremely preterm infants. We aimed to determine if higher nCPAP levels compared with standard nCPAP levels would decrease rates of extubation failure in extremely preterm infants within 7 days of their first extubation.In this multicentre, randomised, open-label controlled trial done at three tertiary perinatal centres in Australia, we assigned extremely preterm infants to extubation to either higher nCPAP (10 cmH2O) or standard nCPAP (7 cmH2O). Infants were eligible if they were born at less than 28 weeks' gestation, were receiving mechanical ventilation via an endotracheal tube, and were being extubated for the first time to nCPAP. Eligible infants must have received previous treatment with exogenous surfactant and caffeine. Infants were ineligible if they were planned to be extubated to a mode of respiratory support other than nCPAP, if they had a known major congenital anomaly that might affect breathing, or if ongoing intensive care was not being provided. Parents or guardians provided prospective, written, informed consent. Infants were maintained within an assigned nCPAP range for a minimum of 24 h after extubation (higher nCPAP group 9-11 cmH2O and standard nCPAP group 6-8 cmH2O). Randomisation was stratified by both gestation (22-25 completed weeks or 26-27 completed weeks) and recruiting centre. The primary outcome was extubation failure within 7 days and analysis was by intention to treat. This trial was prospectively registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, number ACTRN12618001638224.Between March 3, 2019, and July 31, 2022, 483 infants were born at less than 28 weeks and admitted to the recruiting centres. 92 infants were not eligible, 172 were not approached, 65 families declined to participate, and 15 consented but were not randomly assigned. 139 infants were enrolled and randomly assigned, 70 to the higher nCPAP group and 69 to the standard nCPAP group. One infant in the higher nCPAP group was excluded from the analysis because consent was withdrawn after randomisation. 104 (75%) of 138 mothers were White. The mean gestation was 25·7 weeks (SD 1·3) and the mean birthweight was 777 grams (201). 70 (51%) of 138 infants were female. Extubation failure occurred in 24 (35%) of 69 infants in the higher nCPAP group and in 39 (57%) of 69 infants in the standard nCPAP group (risk difference -21·7%, 95% CI -38·5% to -3·7%). There were no significant differences in rates of adverse events between groups during the primary outcome period. Three patients died (two in the higher nCPAP group and one in the standard nCPAP group), pneumothorax occurred in one patient from each group, spontaneous intestinal perforation in three patients (two in the higher nCPAP group and one in the standard nCPAP group) and there were no events of pulmonary interstitial emphysema.Extubation of extremely preterm infants to higher nCPAP significantly reduced extubation failure compared with extubation to standard nCPAP, without increasing rates of adverse effects. Future larger trials are essential to confirm these findings in terms of both efficacy and safety.National Health and Medical Research Council Centre for Research Excellence in Newborn Medicine, number 1153176.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
16秒前
小小虾完成签到 ,获得积分10
25秒前
weiwei完成签到,获得积分10
53秒前
爱思考的小笨笨完成签到,获得积分10
54秒前
1分钟前
研友_nxw2xL完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
科研通AI2S应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
1分钟前
如歌完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
阳光的丹雪完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
Criminology34应助Lulu采纳,获得10
2分钟前
2分钟前
多乐多发布了新的文献求助10
2分钟前
情怀应助多乐多采纳,获得10
2分钟前
蝎子莱莱xth完成签到,获得积分10
3分钟前
氢锂钠钾铷铯钫完成签到,获得积分10
3分钟前
woxinyouyou完成签到,获得积分0
3分钟前
crazy完成签到,获得积分10
3分钟前
Square完成签到,获得积分10
3分钟前
3分钟前
科研通AI6应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
3分钟前
h0jian09完成签到,获得积分10
3分钟前
lovelife完成签到,获得积分10
4分钟前
4分钟前
刘刘完成签到 ,获得积分10
4分钟前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
4分钟前
魔幻的从丹完成签到 ,获得积分10
4分钟前
科研通AI2S应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
5分钟前
科研通AI2S应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
5分钟前
老石完成签到 ,获得积分10
5分钟前
Jessica应助hu采纳,获得10
5分钟前
6分钟前
6分钟前
雨jia完成签到,获得积分10
6分钟前
大个应助鹏哥爱科研采纳,获得10
6分钟前
6分钟前
6分钟前
George发布了新的文献求助10
7分钟前
自然亦凝完成签到,获得积分10
7分钟前
7分钟前
浑续发布了新的文献求助10
7分钟前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Binary Alloy Phase Diagrams, 2nd Edition 8000
Building Quantum Computers 800
Translanguaging in Action in English-Medium Classrooms: A Resource Book for Teachers 700
Natural Product Extraction: Principles and Applications 500
Exosomes Pipeline Insight, 2025 500
Qualitative Data Analysis with NVivo By Jenine Beekhuyzen, Pat Bazeley · 2024 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 生物 医学 工程类 计算机科学 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 复合材料 内科学 化学工程 人工智能 催化作用 遗传学 数学 基因 量子力学 物理化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 5664535
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 4864753
关于积分的说明 15107992
捐赠科研通 4823177
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2582040
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1536144
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1494545