Higher versus lower nasal continuous positive airway pressure for extubation of extremely preterm infants in Australia (ÉCLAT): a multicentre, randomised, superiority trial

医学 持续气道正压 机械通风 气道 麻醉 随机对照试验 通风(建筑) 呼吸衰竭 儿科 外科 工程类 机械工程 阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停
作者
Anna Madeline Kidman,Brett J. Manley,Rosemarie A. Boland,Anil K. Malhotra,Susan Donath,Friederike Beker,Peter G. Davis,Risha Bhatia
出处
期刊:The Lancet Child & Adolescent Health [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:7 (12): 844-851 被引量:22
标识
DOI:10.1016/s2352-4642(23)00235-3
摘要

Extremely preterm infants often require invasive mechanical ventilation, and clinicians aim to extubate these infants as soon as possible. However, extubation failure occurs in up to 60% of extremely preterm infants and is associated with increased mortality and morbidity. Nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP) is the most common post-extubation respiratory support, but there is no consensus on the optimal nCPAP level to safely avoid extubation failure in extremely preterm infants. We aimed to determine if higher nCPAP levels compared with standard nCPAP levels would decrease rates of extubation failure in extremely preterm infants within 7 days of their first extubation.In this multicentre, randomised, open-label controlled trial done at three tertiary perinatal centres in Australia, we assigned extremely preterm infants to extubation to either higher nCPAP (10 cmH2O) or standard nCPAP (7 cmH2O). Infants were eligible if they were born at less than 28 weeks' gestation, were receiving mechanical ventilation via an endotracheal tube, and were being extubated for the first time to nCPAP. Eligible infants must have received previous treatment with exogenous surfactant and caffeine. Infants were ineligible if they were planned to be extubated to a mode of respiratory support other than nCPAP, if they had a known major congenital anomaly that might affect breathing, or if ongoing intensive care was not being provided. Parents or guardians provided prospective, written, informed consent. Infants were maintained within an assigned nCPAP range for a minimum of 24 h after extubation (higher nCPAP group 9-11 cmH2O and standard nCPAP group 6-8 cmH2O). Randomisation was stratified by both gestation (22-25 completed weeks or 26-27 completed weeks) and recruiting centre. The primary outcome was extubation failure within 7 days and analysis was by intention to treat. This trial was prospectively registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, number ACTRN12618001638224.Between March 3, 2019, and July 31, 2022, 483 infants were born at less than 28 weeks and admitted to the recruiting centres. 92 infants were not eligible, 172 were not approached, 65 families declined to participate, and 15 consented but were not randomly assigned. 139 infants were enrolled and randomly assigned, 70 to the higher nCPAP group and 69 to the standard nCPAP group. One infant in the higher nCPAP group was excluded from the analysis because consent was withdrawn after randomisation. 104 (75%) of 138 mothers were White. The mean gestation was 25·7 weeks (SD 1·3) and the mean birthweight was 777 grams (201). 70 (51%) of 138 infants were female. Extubation failure occurred in 24 (35%) of 69 infants in the higher nCPAP group and in 39 (57%) of 69 infants in the standard nCPAP group (risk difference -21·7%, 95% CI -38·5% to -3·7%). There were no significant differences in rates of adverse events between groups during the primary outcome period. Three patients died (two in the higher nCPAP group and one in the standard nCPAP group), pneumothorax occurred in one patient from each group, spontaneous intestinal perforation in three patients (two in the higher nCPAP group and one in the standard nCPAP group) and there were no events of pulmonary interstitial emphysema.Extubation of extremely preterm infants to higher nCPAP significantly reduced extubation failure compared with extubation to standard nCPAP, without increasing rates of adverse effects. Future larger trials are essential to confirm these findings in terms of both efficacy and safety.National Health and Medical Research Council Centre for Research Excellence in Newborn Medicine, number 1153176.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
小小酥被卷了完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
2秒前
Yu发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
明良韵应助wentao采纳,获得10
2秒前
aa完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
ttimmy完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
orixero应助迟迟采纳,获得10
4秒前
molihuakai应助小兔崽子采纳,获得10
4秒前
5秒前
lz发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
5秒前
ZhangDTT完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
lehele发布了新的文献求助30
6秒前
义气的诗霜完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
小二郎应助威武的戎采纳,获得10
7秒前
Yii完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
8秒前
科研通AI6.4应助monkey采纳,获得10
9秒前
9秒前
教授发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
撒上大声说完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
alexisgood完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
装好心完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
11秒前
11秒前
Akim应助卷卷的小蕾采纳,获得10
11秒前
小白菜完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
平常的手套完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
12秒前
隐形冬天完成签到 ,获得积分10
12秒前
小蘑菇应助小小米采纳,获得10
13秒前
鲍勃发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
呆萌威完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
乐乐应助隐形元彤采纳,获得30
14秒前
华仔应助liuye0202采纳,获得100
14秒前
迟迟完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
15秒前
15秒前
Mireia完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
hh完成签到 ,获得积分10
16秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
The anomeric effect 1000
Principles of town planning: translating concepts to applications 1000
Navigating Normative Orders: Interdisciplinary Perspectives 750
1 Peter and Christ's Descent to the Dead in Its Early Christian Reception 700
Organizational Behavior 510
Management and the Arts 510
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7734129
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9284575
关于积分的说明 20166046
捐赠科研通 7311978
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3304606
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2457232
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2313762