亲爱的研友该休息了!由于当前在线用户较少,发布求助请尽量完整的填写文献信息,科研通机器人24小时在线,伴您度过漫漫科研夜!身体可是革命的本钱,早点休息,好梦!

Higher versus lower nasal continuous positive airway pressure for extubation of extremely preterm infants in Australia (ÉCLAT): a multicentre, randomised, superiority trial

医学 持续气道正压 机械通风 气道 麻醉 随机对照试验 通风(建筑) 呼吸衰竭 儿科 外科 机械工程 工程类 阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停
作者
Anna Madeline Kidman,Brett J. Manley,Rosemarie A. Boland,Anil K. Malhotra,Susan Donath,Friederike Beker,Peter G. Davis,Risha Bhatia
出处
期刊:The Lancet Child & Adolescent Health [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:7 (12): 844-851 被引量:11
标识
DOI:10.1016/s2352-4642(23)00235-3
摘要

Extremely preterm infants often require invasive mechanical ventilation, and clinicians aim to extubate these infants as soon as possible. However, extubation failure occurs in up to 60% of extremely preterm infants and is associated with increased mortality and morbidity. Nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP) is the most common post-extubation respiratory support, but there is no consensus on the optimal nCPAP level to safely avoid extubation failure in extremely preterm infants. We aimed to determine if higher nCPAP levels compared with standard nCPAP levels would decrease rates of extubation failure in extremely preterm infants within 7 days of their first extubation.In this multicentre, randomised, open-label controlled trial done at three tertiary perinatal centres in Australia, we assigned extremely preterm infants to extubation to either higher nCPAP (10 cmH2O) or standard nCPAP (7 cmH2O). Infants were eligible if they were born at less than 28 weeks' gestation, were receiving mechanical ventilation via an endotracheal tube, and were being extubated for the first time to nCPAP. Eligible infants must have received previous treatment with exogenous surfactant and caffeine. Infants were ineligible if they were planned to be extubated to a mode of respiratory support other than nCPAP, if they had a known major congenital anomaly that might affect breathing, or if ongoing intensive care was not being provided. Parents or guardians provided prospective, written, informed consent. Infants were maintained within an assigned nCPAP range for a minimum of 24 h after extubation (higher nCPAP group 9-11 cmH2O and standard nCPAP group 6-8 cmH2O). Randomisation was stratified by both gestation (22-25 completed weeks or 26-27 completed weeks) and recruiting centre. The primary outcome was extubation failure within 7 days and analysis was by intention to treat. This trial was prospectively registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, number ACTRN12618001638224.Between March 3, 2019, and July 31, 2022, 483 infants were born at less than 28 weeks and admitted to the recruiting centres. 92 infants were not eligible, 172 were not approached, 65 families declined to participate, and 15 consented but were not randomly assigned. 139 infants were enrolled and randomly assigned, 70 to the higher nCPAP group and 69 to the standard nCPAP group. One infant in the higher nCPAP group was excluded from the analysis because consent was withdrawn after randomisation. 104 (75%) of 138 mothers were White. The mean gestation was 25·7 weeks (SD 1·3) and the mean birthweight was 777 grams (201). 70 (51%) of 138 infants were female. Extubation failure occurred in 24 (35%) of 69 infants in the higher nCPAP group and in 39 (57%) of 69 infants in the standard nCPAP group (risk difference -21·7%, 95% CI -38·5% to -3·7%). There were no significant differences in rates of adverse events between groups during the primary outcome period. Three patients died (two in the higher nCPAP group and one in the standard nCPAP group), pneumothorax occurred in one patient from each group, spontaneous intestinal perforation in three patients (two in the higher nCPAP group and one in the standard nCPAP group) and there were no events of pulmonary interstitial emphysema.Extubation of extremely preterm infants to higher nCPAP significantly reduced extubation failure compared with extubation to standard nCPAP, without increasing rates of adverse effects. Future larger trials are essential to confirm these findings in terms of both efficacy and safety.National Health and Medical Research Council Centre for Research Excellence in Newborn Medicine, number 1153176.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
俊逸吐司完成签到 ,获得积分10
3秒前
xiuxiu发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
WQY发布了新的文献求助30
7秒前
虚心谷梦完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
林迁完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
我是老大应助xiuxiu采纳,获得30
18秒前
cuihao发布了新的文献求助100
49秒前
FashionBoy应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
1分钟前
1分钟前
科研通AI2S应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
1分钟前
uikymh完成签到 ,获得积分0
1分钟前
1分钟前
狂野剑通关注了科研通微信公众号
1分钟前
zm完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
1分钟前
狂野剑通发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
去有风的地方完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
in完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
有魅力的书本完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
漂流的云朵完成签到,获得积分10
2分钟前
煤球完成签到,获得积分10
2分钟前
严冰蝶完成签到 ,获得积分10
2分钟前
李健应助精明平露采纳,获得10
2分钟前
xx完成签到,获得积分10
2分钟前
2分钟前
精明平露发布了新的文献求助10
2分钟前
天天快乐应助精明平露采纳,获得10
2分钟前
nadia完成签到,获得积分10
2分钟前
水水水完成签到 ,获得积分10
2分钟前
3分钟前
3分钟前
精明平露发布了新的文献求助10
3分钟前
科研通AI5应助精明平露采纳,获得10
3分钟前
xixi应助fewsaf采纳,获得10
3分钟前
C_Cppp完成签到 ,获得积分10
3分钟前
3分钟前
也是难得取个名完成签到 ,获得积分10
3分钟前
精明平露发布了新的文献求助10
3分钟前
孙刚完成签到 ,获得积分10
3分钟前
3分钟前
高分求助中
【此为提示信息,请勿应助】请按要求发布求助,避免被关 20000
Les Mantodea de Guyane Insecta, Polyneoptera 2500
Computational Atomic Physics for Kilonova Ejecta and Astrophysical Plasmas 500
Technologies supporting mass customization of apparel: A pilot project 450
Brain and Heart The Triumphs and Struggles of a Pediatric Neurosurgeon 400
Cybersecurity Blueprint – Transitioning to Tech 400
Mixing the elements of mass customisation 400
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 内科学 复合材料 物理化学 电极 遗传学 量子力学 基因 冶金 催化作用
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3782631
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3328049
关于积分的说明 10234257
捐赠科研通 3042990
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1670427
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 799680
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 758971