医学
抗血栓
倾向得分匹配
止血
外科
内科学
危险系数
结肠镜检查
围手术期
置信区间
结直肠癌
癌症
作者
Keisuke Kawasaki,Takehiro Torisu,Motohiro Esaki,Makoto Eizuka,Shinichiro Kawatoko,Tomo Kumei,Minami Hirai,Masahiro Kondo,Shin Fujioka,Yuta Fuyuno,Yuichi Matsuno,Junji Umeno,Tomohiko Moriyama,Takanari Kitazono,Tamotsu Sugai,Takayuki Matsumoto
摘要
Abstract Background and Aim The aim of this study was to elucidate the continuous use of antithrombotic medications during the peri‐colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) period. Methods This study included 468 patients with colorectal epithelial neoplasms treated by ESD, consisting of 82 under antithrombotic medications and 386 patients without the medications. Among patients taking antithrombotic medications, antithrombotic agents were continued during the peri‐ESD period. Clinical characteristics and adverse events were compared after propensity score matching. Results Before and after propensity score matching, post‐colorectal ESD bleeding rate was higher in patients continuing antithrombotic medications (19.5% and 21.6%, respectively) than in those not taking antithrombotic medications (2.9% and 5.4%, respectively). In the Cox regression analysis, continuation of antithrombotic medications was associated with post‐ESD bleeding risk (hazard ratio, 3.73; 95% confidence interval, 1.2–11.6; P < 0.05) compared with patients without antithrombotic therapy. All patients who experienced post‐ESD bleeding were successfully treated by endoscopic hemostasis procedure or conservative therapy. Conclusions Continuation of antithrombotic medications during the peri‐colorectal ESD period increases the risk of bleeding. However, the continuation may be acceptable under careful monitoring for post‐ESD bleeding.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI