Task-based learning versus problem-oriented lecture in neurology continuing medical education.

克朗巴赫阿尔法 考试(生物学) 继续医学教育 基于问题的学习 多项选择 显著性差异 心理学 任务(项目管理) 医学 医学教育 继续教育 临床心理学 心理测量学 内科学 古生物学 管理 经济 生物
作者
Farhan Vakani,Wasim Jafri,Amina Ahmad,Aziz Sonawalla,Mughis Sheerani
出处
期刊:PubMed 卷期号:24 (1): 23-6 被引量:15
链接
标识
摘要

To determine whether general practitioners learned better with task-based learning or problem-oriented lecture in a Continuing Medical Education (CME) set-up.Quasi-experimental study.The Aga Khan University, Karachi campus, from April to June 2012.Fifty-nine physicians were given a choice to opt for either Task-based Learning (TBL) or Problem Oriented Lecture (PBL) in a continuing medical education set-up about headaches. The TBL group had 30 participants divided into 10 small groups, and were assigned case-based tasks. The lecture group had 29 participants. Both groups were given a pre and a post-test. Pre/post assessment was done using one-best MCQs. The reliability coefficient of scores for both the groups was estimated through Cronbach's alpha. An item analysis for difficulty and discriminatory indices was calculated for both the groups. Paired t-test was used to determine the difference between pre- and post-test scores of both groups. Independent t-test was used to compare the impact of the two teaching methods in terms of learning through scores produced by MCQ test.Cronbach's alpha was 0.672 for the lecture group and 0.881 for TBL group. Item analysis for difficulty (p) and discriminatory indexes (d) was obtained for both groups. The results for the lecture group showed pre-test (p) = 42% vs. post-test (p) = 43%; pre- test (d) = 0.60 vs. post-test (d) = 0.40. The TBL group showed pre -test (p) = 48% vs. post-test (p) = 70%; pre-test (d) = 0.69 vs. post-test (d) = 0.73. Lecture group pre-/post-test mean scores were (8.52 ± 2.95 vs. 12.41 ± 2.65; p < 0.001), where TBL group showed (9.70 ± 3.65 vs. 14 ± 3.99; p < 0.001). Independent t-test exhibited an insignificant difference at baseline (lecture 8.52 ± 2.95 vs. TBL 9.70 ± 3.65; p = 0.177). The post-scores were not statistically different lecture 12.41 ± 2.65 vs. TBL 14 ± 3.99; p = 0.07).Both delivery methods were found to be equally effective, showing statistically insignificant differences. However, TBL groups' post-test higher mean scores and radical increase in the post-test difficulty index demonstrated improved learning through TBL delivery and calls for further exploration of longitudinal studies in the context of CME.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
刚刚
Owen应助12345采纳,获得10
2秒前
研友_yLpQrn完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
5秒前
小雨堂完成签到 ,获得积分10
5秒前
Yoopakho发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
8秒前
zzbbzz完成签到,获得积分20
8秒前
忧虑的靖巧完成签到 ,获得积分10
8秒前
kkk完成签到 ,获得积分10
9秒前
10秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
藜藜藜在乎你完成签到 ,获得积分10
11秒前
11秒前
leid完成签到 ,获得积分10
11秒前
great7701完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
JY发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
jiangqingquan完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
12秒前
黑米粥发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
早点毕业完成签到 ,获得积分10
13秒前
13秒前
依梦发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
大个应助追寻地坛采纳,获得10
14秒前
小二郎应助言吾采纳,获得10
14秒前
15秒前
16秒前
orixero应助香蕉闭月采纳,获得10
16秒前
鲍惜寒发布了新的文献求助10
17秒前
小雨发布了新的文献求助10
17秒前
12345发布了新的文献求助10
17秒前
Yoopakho完成签到,获得积分10
19秒前
19秒前
20秒前
紫菱星君发布了新的文献求助30
20秒前
21秒前
22秒前
24秒前
24秒前
已经吐了发布了新的文献求助10
27秒前
高分求助中
【提示信息,请勿应助】请使用合适的网盘上传文件 10000
Continuum Thermodynamics and Material Modelling 2000
The Oxford Encyclopedia of the History of Modern Psychology 1500
Green Star Japan: Esperanto and the International Language Question, 1880–1945 800
Sentimental Republic: Chinese Intellectuals and the Maoist Past 800
The Martian climate revisited: atmosphere and environment of a desert planet 800
Learning to Listen, Listening to Learn 520
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 内科学 复合材料 物理化学 电极 遗传学 量子力学 基因 冶金 催化作用
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3867367
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3409750
关于积分的说明 10664684
捐赠科研通 3133945
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1728674
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 833052
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 780550