审议
口译(哲学)
临床伦理学
临床决策
背景(考古学)
动作(物理)
心理学
认识论
伦理决策
工程伦理学
社会心理学
医学
政治学
计算机科学
法学
家庭医学
哲学
古生物学
程序设计语言
工程类
物理
政治
生物
量子力学
作者
Giulia Inguaggiato,Suzanne Metselaar,Bert Molewijk,Guy Widdershoven
标识
DOI:10.1001/amajethics.2019.913
摘要
In clinical decision making, facts are presented and discussed, preferably in the context of both evidence-based medicine and patients' values. Because clinicians' values also have a role in determining the best courses of action, we argue that reflecting on both patients' and professionals' values fosters good clinical decision making, particularly in situations of moral uncertainty. Moral case deliberation, a form of clinical ethics support, can help elucidate stakeholders' values and how they influence interpretation of facts. This article demonstrates how this approach can help clarify values and contribute to good clinical decision making through a case example.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI