随机对照试验
一致性
医学
决策辅助工具
冲程(发动机)
心房颤动
优势比
决策质量
患者参与
整群随机对照试验
医疗保健
物理疗法
知情同意
梅德林
家庭医学
患者满意度
护理部
替代医学
内科学
政治学
经济增长
工程类
法学
病理
机械工程
经济
作者
Stacey L. Schott,Julia Berkowitz,Shayne E. Dodge,Curtis L. Petersen,Catherine Saunders,Navjot Kaur Sobti,Keren Xu,Megan Coylewright
标识
DOI:10.1161/circoutcomes.120.007329
摘要
BACKGROUND: Shared decision-making in cardiology is increasingly recommended to improve patient-centeredness of care. Decision aids can improve patient knowledge and decisional quality but are infrequently used in real-world practice. This mixed-methods study tests the efficacy and acceptability of a decision aid integrated into the electronic health record (Integrated Decision Aid [IDeA]) and delivered by clinicians for patients with atrial fibrillation considering options to reduce stroke risk. We aimed to determine whether the IDeA improves patient knowledge, reduces decisional conflict, and is seen as acceptable by clinicians and patients. METHODS: A small cluster randomized trial included 6 cardiovascular clinicians and 66 patients randomized either to the IDeA (HealthDecision) or usual care (clinician discretion) during a clinical encounter when stroke prevention treatment options were discussed. The primary outcome was patient knowledge of personalized stroke risk. Exploratory outcomes included decisional conflict, values concordance, trust, the presence of a shared decision-making process, and patient knowledge related to time spent using the IDeA. Additionally, we conducted semistructured interviews with clinicians and patients who used the IDeA were conducted to assess acceptability and predictions of future use. RESULTS: =0.04). There were no significant differences in values concordance, trust in clinician or shared decision-making. Despite training, each clinician used the IDeA differently. Qualitative analysis revealed patients prefer using the IDeA earlier in their diagnosis. Clinicians were satisfied with the IDeA, yet varied in the contexts in which they planned to use it in the future. CONCLUSIONS: Using an Integrated Decision Aid, or IDeA, increases patient knowledge and lessens uncertainty for decision-making around stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation. Qualitative data provide insight into potential implementation strategies in real-world practice.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI