非线性系统
水准点(测量)
接头(建筑物)
制动器
解算器
节点(物理)
时域
频域
梁(结构)
结构工程
弯曲
螺栓连接
工程类
领域(数学分析)
搭接接头
机械接头
抓住
计算机科学
有限元法
机械工程
数学
物理
数学分析
大地测量学
量子力学
计算机视觉
程序设计语言
地理
软件工程
作者
Robert M. Lacayo,Luca Pesaresi,Johann Groß,Daniel Fochler,Jason Armand,Loïc Salles,Christoph Schwingshackl,Matthew S. Allen,Matthew Robert Brake
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.ymssp.2018.05.033
摘要
Motivated by the current demands in high-performance structural analysis, and by a need to better model systems with localized nonlinearities, analysts have developed a number of different approaches for modeling and simulating the dynamics of a bolted-joint structure. However, it is still unclear which approach might be most effective for a given system or set of conditions. To better grasp their similarities and differences, this paper presents a numerical benchmark that assesses how well two diametrically differing joint modeling approaches – a time-domain whole-joint approach and a frequency-domain node-to-node approach – predict and simulate a mechanical joint. These approaches were applied to model the Brake-Reuß beam, a prismatic structure comprised of two beams with a bolted joint interface. The two approaches were validated first by updating the models to reproduce the nonlinear response for the first bending mode of an experimental Brake-Reuß beam. Afterwards, the tuned models were evaluated on their ability to predict the nonlinearity in the dynamic response for the second and third bending modes. The results show that the two joint modeling approaches perform about equally as well in simulating the Brake-Reuß beam. In addition, the exposition highlights improvements that were made in each method during the course of this work and reveal further challenges in advancing the state-of-the-art.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI