Patterns of Carotid Intima–Media Thickness Progression in Kawasaki Patients: A Crystal Ball for Long‐Term Vascular Health?

HomeJournal of the American Heart AssociationVol. 5, No. 7Patterns of Carotid Intima–Media Thickness Progression in Kawasaki Patients: A Crystal Ball for Long‐Term Vascular Health? Open AccessEditorialPDF/EPUBAboutView PDFView EPUBSections ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload citationsTrack citations ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InMendeleyReddit Jump toOpen AccessEditorialPDF/EPUBPatterns of Carotid Intima–Media Thickness Progression in Kawasaki Patients: A Crystal Ball for Long‐Term Vascular Health? Jessica Haley, MD and Elif Seda Selamet Tierney, MD Jessica HaleyJessica Haley Division of Cardiology, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford School of Medicine, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA and Elif Seda Selamet TierneyElif Seda Selamet Tierney Division of Cardiology, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford School of Medicine, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA Originally published5 Jul 2016https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.116.003778Journal of the American Heart Association. 2016;5:e003778Kawasaki disease (KD) is an acute vasculitis of unknown etiology that predominantly affects infants and young children. It manifests with fever, rash, enanthem, conjunctival injection, extremity changes, cervical adenopathy, and laboratory test results reflecting intense systemic inflammation.1 If not treated, 1 in 5 children develop coronary artery aneurysms (CAAs). Administration of high‐dose intravenous immunoglobulin and aspirin has been found to reduce the rate of CAAs by 5‐fold (from 25% to 5%).2, 3 The goal of therapy in the acute phase of KD is to reduce inflammation in the coronary artery wall and to prevent coronary artery thrombosis.Patients who develop giant aneurysms suffer the greatest morbidity and mortality. Although the risk of myocardial infarction from coronary artery thrombosis is greatest in the first 2 years after the acute illness, coronary artery stenosis and occlusion progress over years.4, 5 Information regarding coronary artery histology in KD patients is based primarily on autopsies from patients who died as a result of complications from the vasculitis, and this limits our understanding to only the most severe forms.4 A review of autopsies from KD patients revealed that the arterial pathology includes necrotizing arteritis, subacute or chronic vasculitis, and luminal myofibroblastic proliferation.4 The acute arteritis is predominantly characterized by neutrophilic infiltrate that can lead to necrosis in the vessel wall. Subacute vasculitis begins weeks after the onset of fever, can still be detected months to years later, and is closely associated with luminal myofibroblastic profileration. Luminal myofibroblastic proliferation is associated with the subacute process that occurs months to years after disease onset and can result in luminal narrowing, which can lead to cardiac ischemia.4In affected patients, CAAs evolve over time, increasing in size during the first few months after the onset of illness and then regressing over the next 2 years to near‐normal lumen diameter. Despite the return to normal internal lumen diameter that is seen in small and moderate CAAs, studies have shown late myointimal thickening of the arterial wall with impaired coronary vascular reactivity and coronary flow reserve in these patients.6, 7, 8In the current era, the majority of children treated with intravenous immunoglobulin in the acute phase of illness never develop coronary artery abnormalities. Some studies have raised concerns, even in this "always normal" group. Myocardial blood flow and coronary flow reserve were reported to be diminished in a study,9 and some studies performed in Asia have suggested impaired endothelial function10 and increased arterial stiffness in these patients.11 Studies in North America, however, have not detected long‐term changes in vascular function of KD patients with no history of coronary artery aneursyms.12, 13Several noninvasive vascular assessment modalities that serve as surrogate markers of cardiovascular risk have been used to investigate the vascular health of KD patients. Flow‐mediated dilation and pulse amplitude testing have been used to measure endothelial dysfunction. Both modalities are based on the concept of reactive hyperemia caused by increased shear stress that results in endothelial release of nitric oxide and correlates with coronary endothelial function.14, 15 An alternative noninvasive method is measurement of arterial stiffness by pulsed‐wave analysis or arterial tonometry, as an indicator of increased cardiovascular disease risk.16 Another modality for assessing vascular health is carotid artery ultrasound. Increased carotid intima–medial thickness (cIMT) measured by carotid ultrasound has been shown to reliably represent the presence of atherosclerosis.17This issue of Journal of the American Heart Association includes a longitudinal cohort study that evaluated the long‐term impact of history of KD on cardiovascular risk.18 Dietz et al compared cIMT in 319 patients with a history of KD (median age 8.1 years [range 5–43.3 years] at the first cIMT measurement) and 150 control patients who consisted primarily of siblings of the patients (n=130, median age 12.5 years [range 7–31.1 years]). In only 148 of the 319 KD patients, >1 cIMT measurement was performed over a 15‐year period; however, by creating a multilevel, repeated‐measures, linear mixed‐effects model, the authors were able to use all cIMT measurements to create a large study group.Of the 319 participants with a history of KD, the majority (241, 75.5%) had a worst‐ever coronary artery z score of 2.5. The remaining group consisted of 51 patients (16.0%) who had CAAs with z scores of 2.5 to 10 and 27 patients (8.5%) with giant aneurysms with z scores ≥10 and/or diameters of ≥8 mm. The authors, appropriately, adjusted for sex, body mass index, age, and blood pressure in their analysis model. The investigators reported high reproducibility of cIMT measurements in their laboratory; however, because different machines were used during the course of the study, the investigators incorporated a correction factor in their analysis.The investigators reported that mean cIMT was increased in KD patients compared with controls (0.375 mm [95% CI 0.372–0.378 mm] versus 0.363 mm [95% CI 0.358–0.368 mm]; P=0<0.001).18 When comparing the different subgroups based on CAA status, mean cIMT was increased across all subgroups compared with controls (0.373, 0.374, 0.381, and 0.363 mm in patients with no CAAs, in patients with CAAs with z scores 2.5 to 10, in patients with giant aneurysms, and in controls, respectively).The model for the longitudinal cIMT data analysis over time showed that all patients with a history of KD started with a higher cIMT (intercept +0.0145 mm [95% CI 0.0042–0.0248 mm; P=0.006] at age 5 compared with controls). There was no difference in increase per age‐year (−0.0004 mm [95% CI −0.0014 to 0.0007 mm; P=0.490] increase per year compared with controls).18 In further subgroup analyses, compared with controls, patients with no CAAs started with a significantly higher cIMT at age 5 years (+0.0193 mm [95% CI 0.0089–0.0297 mm; P<0.001]), but this difference decreased per year (−0.0014 mm per year [95% CI −0.0025 to −0.0003 mm; P=0.012]). There was no significant difference between controls and patients with small to medium CAAs, either in cIMT at age 5 years or in cIMT progression per year. Compared with controls, patients with giant CAAs had higher but nonsignificant cIMT levels at age 5 years and a trend toward increased cIMT progression per year (0.0013 mm per year [95% CI −0.0000 to 0.0027 mm; P=0.058]).Within the KD groups, when comparing patients with no CAA and patients with small to medium and giant CAAs, both groups had a comparable intercept at age 5 years, but the latter group had significantly increased progression (0.0015 mm per year [95% CI 0.0001–0.0030 mm; P=0.038] and 0.0027 mm per year [95% CI 0.0015–0.0039 mm; P<0.001], respectively). The authors also analyzed the data including only the measurements of patients with follow‐up data. This analysis showed a result similar to the analyses including all patients.This study is the first longitudinal cIMT study in KD, demonstrating a gradual increase in cIMT in KD patients with giant aneurysms and showing that patients without history of CAAs demonstrated normalization of cIMT with time, despite an initial increase in cIMT compared with controls. These findings are similar to those of the cross‐sectional study by Dietz et al, who observed increased cIMT in all patients with CAAs, whereas in patients with no CAAs, increased cIMT was apparent only at a young age, suggesting similar regression of cIMT with time.19 In a similar cross‐sectional study by Selamet Tierney et al, there was no significant difference in cIMT in KD patients with no CAAs and control patients.12 These conflicting results could be due to the fact that the patients in the latter study were older, with a mean age of 16.7 years, and thus further from KD onset (median of 11.6 years). The increased cIMT at younger age in patients with no history of CAAs is most likely caused by subsiding inflammation.Another important finding of the study is that KD patients with giant CAAs had an increased rate of cIMT progression compared with the other KD patients. This finding aligns with several studies published in this population and documenting abnormal vascular health in this subgroup of KD patients. The cIMT is a well‐established surrogate marker of atherosclerosis and predictor of cardiovascular events.17 Increased rate of cIMT progression has been associated with increased incidence of stroke in adult patients who were free from cardiovascular events,20 and in young adults, it has been associated with cardiovascular risk factors in childhood.21Although it is tempting to suggest that the increased cIMT found in KD patients represents an increased risk of cardiovascular disease, in reality, this inference must be made with caution because of the different vascular pathophysiology that occurs in KD and that differs from traditional atherosclerosis. Despite the fact that the term "atherosclerosis" is loosely applied to vascular lesions found late after KD, autopsy evidence does not support this use. Autopsy reports in KD patients rarely mention lipid‐laden macrophages and cholesterol crystals, which are the hallmarks of atherosclerosis.22 Suzuki et al examined patients who died 3 to 12 years after KD and found active remodeling of the aneurysms with intimal proliferation and neoangiogenesis, but there was no evidence of atherosclerosis.23 This highlights the importance of prospective tracking of deaths in KD cases and correlation of histopathology with coronary artery findings during the acute illness and with lifetime cardiovascular events to better risk‐stratify the KD population.This eloquent work by Dietz et al adds to the body of literature suggesting that KD patients who never had CAAs do not have higher cardiovascular risk profiles compared with the non‐KD population in the long term. Perhaps the use of multiple noninvasive imaging modalities over time in this patient population would provide a clearer picture of vascular health and possibly serve as risk stratification for future cardiovascular events. Until further longitudinal data become available, KD patients should be followed long term and assessed for known cardiovascular risk factors. Clinicians should use the American Heart Association guidelines for cardiovascular risk reduction in high‐risk pediatric patients for guidance on treatment, with particular attention paid to the degree of initial coronary artery involvement.24DisclosuresNone.Footnotes*Correspondence to: Elif Seda Selamet Tierney, MD, Division of Cardiology, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford School of Medicine, 750 Welch Rd, Suite 305, Palo Alto, CA 94306. E‐mail: [email protected]eduThe opinions expressed in this article are not necessarily those of the editors or of the American Heart Association.References1 Kato H, Koike S, Yamamoto M, Ito Y, Yano E. Coronary aneurysms in infants and young children with acute febrile mucocutaneous lymph node syndrome. J Pediatr. 1975; 86:892–898.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar2 Newburger JW, Takahashi M, Beiser AS, Burns JC, Bastian J, Chung KJ, Colan SD, Duffy E, Fulton DR, Glode MP, Mason WH, Meissner C, Rowley AH, Shulman ST, Reddy V, Sundel RP, Wiggins JW, Colton T, Melish ME, Rosen FS. A single intravenous infusion of gamma globulin as compared with four infusions in the treatment of acute Kawasaki syndrome. N Engl J Med. 1991; 324:1633–1639.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar3 Furusho K, Kamiya T, Nakano H, Kiyosawa N, Shinomiya K, Hayashidera T, Tamura T, Hirose O, Manabe Y, Yokoyama T, Baba K, Mori C. High‐dose intravenous gammaglobulin for Kawasaki disease. Lancet. 1984; 2:1055–1058.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar4 Orenstein JM, Shulman ST, Fox LM, Baker SC, Takahashi M, Bhatti TR, Russo PA, Mierau GW, de Chadarévian JP, Perlman EJ, Trevenen C, Rotta AT, Kalelkar MB, Rowley AH. Three linked vasculopathic processes characterize Kawasaki disease: a light and transmission electron microscopic study. PLoS One. 2012; 7:e38998.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar5 Kato H, Ichinose E, Kawasaki T. Myocardial infarction in Kawasaki disease: clinical analyses in 195 cases. J Pediatr. 1986; 108:923–927.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar6 Tsuda E, Kamiya T, Kimura K, Ono Y, Echigo S. Coronary artery dilatation exceeding 4.0 mm during acute Kawasaki disease predicts a high probability of subsequent late intima‐medial thickening. Pediatr Cardiol. 2002; 23:9–14.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar7 Yamakawa R, Ishii M, Sugimura T, Akagi T, Eto G, Iemura M, Tsutsumi T, Kato H. Coronary endothelial dysfunction after Kawasaki disease: evaluation by intracoronary injection of acetylcholine. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1998; 31:1074–1080.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar8 Furuyama H, Odagawa Y, Katoh C, Iwado Y, Ito Y, Noriyasu K, Mabuchi M, Yoshinaga K, Kuge Y, Kobayashi K, Tamaki N. Altered myocardial flow reserve and endothelial function late after Kawasaki disease. J Pediatr. 2003; 142:149–154.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar9 Muzik O, Paridon SM, Singh TP, Morrow WR, Dayanikli F, Di Carli MF. Quantification of myocardial blood flow and flow reserve in children with a history of Kawasaki disease and normal coronary arteries using positron emission tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1996; 28:757–762.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar10 Dhillon R, Clarkson P, Donald AE, Powe AJ, Nash M, Novelli V, Dillon MJ, Deanfield JE. Endothelial dysfunction late after Kawasaki disease. Circulation. 1996; 94:2103–2106.LinkGoogle Scholar11 Cheung YF, Yung TC, Tam SC, Ho MH, Chau AK. Novel and traditional cardiovascular risk factors in children after Kawasaki disease: implications for premature atherosclerosis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004; 43:120–124.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar12 Selamet Tierney ES, Gal D, Gauvreau K, Baker AL, Trevey S, O'Neill SR, Jaff MR, de Ferranti S, Fulton DR, Colan SD, Newburger JW. Vascular health in Kawasaki disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013; 62:1114–1121.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar13 McCrindle BW, McIntyre S, Kim C, Lin T, Adeli K. Are patients after Kawasaki disease at increased risk for accelerated atherosclerosis?J Pediatr. 2007; 151:244–248, 248.e1.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar14 Deanfield JE, Halcox JP, Rabelink TJ. Endothelial function and dysfunction: testing and clinical relevance. Circulation. 2007; 115:1285–1295.LinkGoogle Scholar15 Bonetti PO, Pumper GM, Higano ST, Holmes DR, Kuvin JT, Lerman A. Noninvasive identification of patients with early coronary atherosclerosis by assessment of digital reactive hyperemia. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004; 44:2137–2141.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar16 Weber T, Auer J, O'Rourke MF, Kvas E, Lassnig E, Berent R, Eber B. Arterial stiffness, wave reflections, and the risk of coronary artery disease. Circulation. 2004; 109:184–189.LinkGoogle Scholar17 Heiss G, Sharrett AR, Barnes R, Chambless LE, Szklo M, Alzola C. Carotid atherosclerosis measured by B‐mode ultrasound in populations: associations with cardiovascular risk factors in the ARIC study. Am J Epidemiol. 1991; 134:250–256.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar18 Dietz SM, Tacke CE, Kuipers I, Hutten B, Kuijpers T. Extracardial vasculopathy after Kawasaki disease: a long term follow‐up study. J Am Heart Assoc. 2016; 5:e003414 doi: 10.1161/JAHA.116.003414.LinkGoogle Scholar19 Dietz SM, Tacke CE, Gort J, Kuipers IM, de Groot E, Wiegman A, Hutten BA, Kuijpers TW. Carotid intima‐media thickness in patients with a history of Kawasaki disease. Circ J. 2015; 79:2682–2687.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar20 Polak JF, Pencina MJ, O'Leary DH, D'Agostino RB. Common carotid artery intima‐media thickness progression as a predictor of stroke in Multi‐Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis. Stroke. 2011; 42:3017–3021.LinkGoogle Scholar21 Juonala M, Viikari JS, Kahonen M, Taittonen L, Laitinen T, Hutri‐Kahonen N, Lehtimaki T, Jula A, Pietikainen M, Jokinen E, Telama R, Rasanen L, Mikkila V, Helenius H, Kivimaki M, Raitakari OT. Life‐time risk factors and progression of carotid atherosclerosis in young adults: the Cardiovascular Risk in Young Finns study. Eur Heart J. 2010; 31:1745–1751.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar22 Fujiwara H, Fujiwara T, Kao TC, Ohshio G, Hamashima Y. Pathology of Kawasaki disease in the healed stage. Relationships between typical and atypical cases of Kawasaki disease. Acta Pathol Jpn. 1986; 36:857–867.MedlineGoogle Scholar23 Suzuki A, Miyagawa‐Tomita S, Komatsu K, Nishikawa T, Sakomura Y, Horie T, Nakazawa M. Active remodeling of the coronary arterial lesions in the late phase of Kawasaki disease: immunohistochemical study. Circulation. 2000; 101:2935–2941.LinkGoogle Scholar24 Kavey RE, Allada V, Daniels SR, Hayman LL, McCrindle BW, Newburger JW, Parekh RS, Steinberger J. Cardiovascular risk reduction in high‐risk pediatric patients: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Expert Panel on Population and Prevention Science; the Councils on Cardiovascular Disease in the Young, Epidemiology and Prevention, Nutrition, Physical Activity and Metabolism, High Blood Pressure Research, Cardiovascular Nursing, and the Kidney in Heart Disease; and the Interdisciplinary Working Group on Quality of Care and Outcomes Research: endorsed by the American Academy of Pediatrics. Circulation. 2006; 114:2710–2738.LinkGoogle Scholar Previous Back to top Next FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited By Argyropoulou O, Protogerou A and Sfikakis P (2018) Accelerated atheromatosis and arteriosclerosis in primary systemic vasculitides: current evidence and future perspectives, Current Opinion in Rheumatology, 10.1097/BOR.0000000000000453, 30:1, (36-43), Online publication date: 1-Jan-2018. July 6, 2016Vol 5, Issue 7Article InformationMetrics © 2016 The Authors. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley Blackwell.This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial‐NoDerivs License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.116.003778PMID: 27381761 Originally publishedJuly 5, 2016 Keywordslong‐term follow‐upKawasaki diseasecarotid ultrasoundEditorialsPDF download SubjectsEchocardiographyInflammatory Heart DiseasePeripheral Vascular DiseaseUltrasound