生化复发
医学
前列腺切除术
手术切缘
旁侵犯
病态的
淋巴血管侵犯
前列腺特异性抗原
泌尿科
前列腺癌
阶段(地层学)
T级
比例危险模型
内科学
单变量分析
列线图
危险系数
多元分析
癌症
转移
古生物学
生物
置信区间
作者
Takeshi Hashimoto,Kunihiko Yoshioka,Go Nagao,Yoshihiro Nakagami,Yoshio Ohno,Yutaka Horiguchi,Kazunori Namiki,Jun Nakashima,Masaaki Tachibana
摘要
Objectives To examine biochemical recurrence after robot‐assisted radical prostatectomy in J apanese patients, and to develop a risk stratification model for biochemical recurrence. Methods The study cohort consisted of 784 patients with localized prostate cancer who underwent robot‐assisted radical prostatectomy without neoadjuvant or adjuvant endocrine therapy. The relationships of biochemical recurrence with perioperative findings were evaluated. The prognostic factors for biochemical recurrence‐free survival were evaluated using C ox proportional hazard model analyses. Results During the follow‐up period, 80 patients showed biochemical recurrence. The biochemical recurrence‐free survival rates at 1, 3, and 5 years were 92.2%, 85.2% and 80.1%, respectively. In univariate analysis, the prostate‐specific antigen level, prostate‐specific antigen density, biopsy G leason score, percent positive core, pathological T stage, pathological G leason score, lymphovascular invasion, perineural invasion and positive surgical margin were significantly associated with biochemical recurrence. In multivariate analysis, prostate‐specific antigen density ≥0.4 ( P = 0.0011), pathological T stage ≥3a ( P = 0.002), pathological G leason score ≥8 ( P = 0.007) and positive surgical margin ( P < 0.0001) were independent predictors of biochemical recurrence. The patients were stratified into three risk groups according to these factors. The 5‐year biochemical recurrence‐free survival rate was 89.4% in the low‐risk group, 65.6% in the intermediate‐risk group and 30.3% in the high‐risk group. Conclusions The prostate‐specific antigen density, pathological T stage, pathological G leason score and positive surgical margin were independent prognostic factors for biochemical recurrence. The risk stratification model developed using these four factors could help clinicians identify patients with a poor prognosis who might be good candidates for clinical trials of alternative management strategies.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI