A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blinded Controlled Trial Comparing Ibuprofen and Acetaminophen Versus Hydrocodone and Acetaminophen for Soft Tissue Hand Procedures

医学 氢可酮 对乙酰氨基酚 麻醉 随机对照试验 布洛芬 止痛药 外科 可视模拟标度 类阿片 羟考酮 内科学 药理学 受体
作者
Kent T. Weinheimer,Brett Michelotti,Jeremy Silver,Kenneth F. Taylor,Alexander Payatakes
出处
期刊:The Journal of Hand Surgery [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:44 (5): 387-393 被引量:43
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.jhsa.2018.10.014
摘要

Purpose To compare the efficacy of opioid versus nonopioid analgesic regimens after elective, soft tissue hand surgery. We hypothesized that there would be no difference in patient-perceived pain relief between these 2 groups. Methods This prospective, randomized, double-blinded controlled trial included patients undergoing elective soft tissue hand procedures (carpal tunnel release, trigger finger release, first dorsal compartment release, or ganglion cyst excision). Patients were randomized before surgery into 2 treatment groups: acetaminophen/hydrocodone 325/5 mg (AH, opioid group) or acetaminophen/ibuprofen 500/400 mg (AIBU, nonopioid group) and followed for 2 weeks after surgery evaluating daily pain intensity scores—visual analog scale (VAS), medication pain relief (Likert pain relief score), need for rescue opioid prescription at 1 week, and days until pain-free. Results Sixty patients were randomized, 30 in the AH group and 30 in the AIBU group. There was no difference in the average VAS score. There was improved pain relief in the AIBU group, but the difference did not reach significance. There was no difference in time until pain-free, with a median of 5 days in the AH group and 3 days in the AIBU group. Two patients in each group required rescue opioid medication. Side effects were significantly more common in the AH group (n = 7; 23%) than the AIBU group (n = 1; 3%), but none were severe. Conclusions We recommend surgeons consider a combination of acetaminophen and ibuprofen as a safe and effective postoperative pain regimen for soft tissue hand surgery procedures. Type of study/level of evidence Therapeutic I. To compare the efficacy of opioid versus nonopioid analgesic regimens after elective, soft tissue hand surgery. We hypothesized that there would be no difference in patient-perceived pain relief between these 2 groups. This prospective, randomized, double-blinded controlled trial included patients undergoing elective soft tissue hand procedures (carpal tunnel release, trigger finger release, first dorsal compartment release, or ganglion cyst excision). Patients were randomized before surgery into 2 treatment groups: acetaminophen/hydrocodone 325/5 mg (AH, opioid group) or acetaminophen/ibuprofen 500/400 mg (AIBU, nonopioid group) and followed for 2 weeks after surgery evaluating daily pain intensity scores—visual analog scale (VAS), medication pain relief (Likert pain relief score), need for rescue opioid prescription at 1 week, and days until pain-free. Sixty patients were randomized, 30 in the AH group and 30 in the AIBU group. There was no difference in the average VAS score. There was improved pain relief in the AIBU group, but the difference did not reach significance. There was no difference in time until pain-free, with a median of 5 days in the AH group and 3 days in the AIBU group. Two patients in each group required rescue opioid medication. Side effects were significantly more common in the AH group (n = 7; 23%) than the AIBU group (n = 1; 3%), but none were severe. We recommend surgeons consider a combination of acetaminophen and ibuprofen as a safe and effective postoperative pain regimen for soft tissue hand surgery procedures.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
lllllll发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
精明的蜗牛完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
2秒前
szx发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
3秒前
华仔应助Stephhen采纳,获得10
3秒前
刘谦发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
朴素乌龟应助炙热三颜采纳,获得20
4秒前
bububusbu完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
JamesPei应助独特的水儿采纳,获得10
4秒前
坚强灭男完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
Moran完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
徐一诺发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
桐桐应助gefan采纳,获得10
6秒前
6秒前
7秒前
Ava应助研友_LMNRrn采纳,获得10
7秒前
Aurora应助jqs采纳,获得10
7秒前
8秒前
9秒前
9秒前
挣钱养狗发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
10秒前
绫小路发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
希望天下0贩的0应助hyx采纳,获得10
11秒前
dudupig完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
11秒前
12秒前
ared完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
Jayden应助Lingalal采纳,获得10
12秒前
医者仁心完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
英俊的铭应助prp采纳,获得10
12秒前
13秒前
shadow发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
李天磊发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
14秒前
万能图书馆应助忧郁滑板采纳,获得30
15秒前
sxd完成签到 ,获得积分10
15秒前
自然老师应助guoym采纳,获得10
16秒前
16秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Essentials of Carbohydrate Chemistry and Biochemistry, 4th Edition 800
Navigating Normative Orders. Interdisciplinary Perspectives 800
Organizational Behavior 510
Management and the Arts 510
Matrix Methods in Data Mining and Pattern Recognition Second Edition 510
CLSI VET01S-2024 Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Disk and Dilution Susceptibility Tests for Bacteria Isolated From Animals (7th Ed) 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7758594
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9304563
关于积分的说明 20281378
捐赠科研通 7342337
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3312241
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2462812
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2326142