亲爱的研友该休息了!由于当前在线用户较少,发布求助请尽量完整的填写文献信息,科研通机器人24小时在线,伴您度过漫漫科研夜!身体可是革命的本钱,早点休息,好梦!

Retrospective single-surgeon study of prone versus lateral robotic pedicle screw placement: a CT-based assessment of accuracy

医学 俯卧位 腰椎 透视 外科 核医学
作者
Nolan J. Brown,Zach Pennington,Cathleen C. Kuo,Shane Shahrestani,Justin Gold,Luis Daniel Diaz-Aguilar,Yusuf Mehkri,Rohin Singh,Julian Gendreau,Martin H. Pham
出处
期刊:Journal of neurosurgery [Journal of Neurosurgery Publishing Group]
卷期号:: 1-8
标识
DOI:10.3171/2023.5.spine221296
摘要

Lateral lumbar interbody fusion including anterior-to-psoas oblique lumbar interbody fusion has conventionally relied on pedicle screw placement (PSP) for construct stabilization. Single-position surgery with lumbar interbody fusion in the lateral decubitus position with concomitant PSP has been associated with increased operative efficiency. What remains unclear is the accuracy of PSP with robotic guidance when compared with the more familiar prone patient positioning. The present study aimed to compare robot-assisted screw placement accuracy between patients with instrumentation placed in the prone and lateral positions.The authors identified all consecutive patients treated with interbody fusion and PSP in the prone or lateral position by a single surgeon between January 2019 and October 2022. All pedicle screws placed were analyzed using CT scans to determine appropriate positioning according to the Gertzbein-Robbins classification grading system (grade C or worse was considered as a radiographically significant breach). Multivariate logistic regression models were constructed to identify risk factors for the occurrence of a radiographically significant breach.Eighty-nine consecutive patients (690 screws) were included, of whom 46 (477 screws) were treated in the prone position and 43 (213 screws) in the lateral decubitus position. There were fewer breaches in the prone (n = 13, 2.7%) than the lateral decubitus (n = 15, 7.0%) group (p = 0.012). Nine (1.9%) radiographically significant breaches occurred in the prone group compared with 10 (4.7%) in the lateral decubitus group (p = 0.019), for a prone versus lateral decubitus PSP accuracy rate of 98.1% versus 95.3%. There were no significant differences in BMI between prone versus lateral decubitus cohorts (30.1 vs 29.6) or patients with screw breach versus those without (31.2 vs 29.5). In multivariate models, the prone position was the only significant protective factor for screw accuracy; no other significant risk factors for screw breach were identified.The present data suggest that pedicle screws placed with robotic assistance have higher placement accuracy in the prone position. Further studies will be needed to validate the accuracy of PSP in the lateral position as single-position surgery becomes more commonplace in the treatment of spinal disorders.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
26秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
27秒前
41秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
56秒前
所所应助ZYP采纳,获得10
1分钟前
1分钟前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
2分钟前
2分钟前
2分钟前
Demi_Ming发布了新的文献求助10
2分钟前
莎莎完成签到 ,获得积分10
2分钟前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
2分钟前
2分钟前
大红参发布了新的文献求助10
2分钟前
英姑应助大红参采纳,获得10
3分钟前
3分钟前
3分钟前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
3分钟前
高源发布了新的文献求助10
3分钟前
cadcae完成签到,获得积分10
3分钟前
小丁发布了新的文献求助10
3分钟前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助150
3分钟前
科研通AI5应助小丁采纳,获得10
3分钟前
研友_nVWP2Z完成签到 ,获得积分10
3分钟前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助30
4分钟前
4分钟前
4分钟前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
4分钟前
JrPaleo101完成签到,获得积分10
4分钟前
4分钟前
害羞的青筠完成签到,获得积分10
4分钟前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
4分钟前
5分钟前
5分钟前
千里草发布了新的文献求助10
5分钟前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
5分钟前
5分钟前
5分钟前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
5分钟前
高分求助中
【提示信息,请勿应助】请使用合适的网盘上传文件 10000
Continuum Thermodynamics and Material Modelling 2000
Green Star Japan: Esperanto and the International Language Question, 1880–1945 800
Sentimental Republic: Chinese Intellectuals and the Maoist Past 800
The Martian climate revisited: atmosphere and environment of a desert planet 800
Learning to Listen, Listening to Learn 520
Plasmonics 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 内科学 复合材料 物理化学 电极 遗传学 量子力学 基因 冶金 催化作用
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3868018
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3410275
关于积分的说明 10667022
捐赠科研通 3134478
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1729108
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 833178
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 780620