医学
传统PCI
观察研究
人口
内科学
急诊医学
回顾性队列研究
原发性血管成形术
大流行
2019年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)
人口学
心肌梗塞
心脏病学
经皮冠状动脉介入治疗
疾病
环境卫生
传染病(医学专业)
社会学
作者
Monica Verdoia,Magdy Algowhary,Berat Uğuz,Dinaldo Cavalcanti de Oliveira,V. I. Ganyukov,Zan Zimbakov,Miha Čerček,Lisette Okkels Jensen,Poay Huan Loh,Lucian Câlmâc,Gerard Roura Ferrer,Alexandre Schaan de Quadros,Marek Malewski,Fortunato Scotto di Uccio,Clemens von Birgelen,Francesco Versaci,Jurriën M. ten Berg,Gianni Casella,Aaron Wong Sung Lung,Petr Kala
标识
DOI:10.2174/0115701611335913250408214530
摘要
Background: Several scores have been developed to facilitate risk stratification and early discharge following primary angioplasty, particularly the Zwolle Risk Score (ZRS). However, validation in large-sized studies is still lacking. Therefore, the aim of the current study was to validate the use of the ZRS in a contemporary global population, including patients who were treated during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic and enrolled in a large intercontinental observational study. Methods: The ISACS-STEMI COVID-19 is a large-scale retrospective multicenter registry involving primary PCI centers from Europe, Latin America, South-East Asia, and NorthAfrica, including patients treated from March 1st until June 30th, in 2019 and 2020]. ZRS was calculated for each patient. The patients were additionally categorized according to the following values of the ZRS [≤3; 4-6; 7-9; ≥10]. Our study outcomes were in-hospital and 30-day mortality. The discriminatory capacity of the ZRS was assessed by the area under the ROC curve [c statistic] as an index of model performance. Results: Our population is represented by 16084 STEMI patients undergoing mechanical reperfusion enrolled in 109 centers. The score showed a very good performance in the predicting mortality both in-hospital [AUC=0.83 [0.82-0.85], p<0.0001] and at 30- day follow-up [AUC=0.82 [0.81-0.84, p<0.0001]. The results were confirmed when the ZRS was separately applied to patients treated in 2019 and 2020, with good stability across time. ZRS was able to identify a large cohort [n=10672, 66.3%] of low-risk patients [score ≤3] with a very low mortality rate at 2 days [1%] and between 3 and 10 days [0.7%], with a very good negative predictive value for in-hospital [98.3%] and 30-day mortality [97.7%], with similar results in 2019 and 2020. Conclusion: This study is the first to demonstrate the good prognostic performance of the ZRS in a large-scale contemporary global multicenter validation set. Similar results were obtained both in the pre-pandemic and the COVID-19 era. ZRS ≤3 identified a very low-risk population that could be discharged early, even during the COVID-19 pandemic, with expected advantages in the availability of hospital beds and nursing staff, costs of medical care, and in-hospital risk of contagion.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI