灵敏度(控制系统)
约束(计算机辅助设计)
差异(会计)
选择(遗传算法)
空格(标点符号)
人工智能
变化(天文学)
心理学
计算机科学
人口
认知心理学
模式识别(心理学)
机器学习
数学
社会学
工程类
人口学
物理
会计
业务
操作系统
天体物理学
电子工程
几何学
作者
Peter A. Bandettini,Javier Gonzalez-Castillo,Dan Handwerker,Paul Taylor,Gang Chen,Adam Thomas
出处
期刊:Med
[Elsevier BV]
日期:2022-08-01
卷期号:3 (8): 526-531
被引量:1
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.medj.2022.07.002
摘要
The recent paper by Marek et al.1 has shown that, to capture brain-wide associations using fMRI and MRI measures, thousands of individuals are required. These results can be potentially misunderstood to imply that MRI or fMRI lack sensitivity or specificity. This commentary discusses the demonstrated sensitivity of fMRI and focuses on methodology that may allow improvements in BWA studies. While individual variation may be an ultimate constraint, refinements in acquisition, population selection, and processing may bring about higher correlations.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI