Use of shape to distinguish Chamelea gallina and Chamelea striatula (Bivalvia: Veneridae): Linear and geometric morphometric methods

Abstract The commercially fished striped venus clams Chamelea gallina and C. striatula (Bivalvia: Veneridae) are difficult to distinguish by inexperienced observers and the taxonomy of these species is still an issue of discussion. The differences in shape between C. gallina and C. striatula from Portuguese coastal waters were studied through conventional linear and geometric morphometric analysis, using both contour (elliptic Fourier analysis) and landmark‐based methods. The relationships shell length vs. height, width, and total weight were significantly different between species. However, because there was a considerable overlap in the data sets, the species could not be distinguished using any combination of those linear measurements. Geometric morphometric methods provided shape variables that led to 0–6% misclassification rates between species; linear morphometric measures led to 16.8% error. Contour analysis revealed differences primarily in the shell umbo and lunular area. The umbo was more “sharp” and the lunula less pronounced in C. striatula than in C. gallina . Generalized procrustes superimposition (landmark analysis) showed that the main differences between species reside in the length of the pallial sinus. Thus, an index was developed (PI: Pallial Index = pallial sinus length/shell length), which was successfully used to separate the species (with 100% correct classification), i.e., specimens with PI lower than 0.119 belonged to C. gallina , whereas greater PI values were attributed to C. striatula . The use of these geometric morphometric methods allowed the detection of differences in shape between these two species and to develop an easy‐to‐use identification index. We encourage the development of analogous indices that apply the methods of geometric morphometrics to distinguish between other species whose identification is complicated. J. Morphol., 2006. © 2006 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.