过度消费
能量平衡
肥胖
大流行
医学
平衡(能力)
透视图(图形)
概念模型
内科学
心理学
内分泌学
经济
生物
计算机科学
2019年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)
物理医学与康复
疾病
宏观经济学
数据库
人工智能
生态学
传染病(医学专业)
生产(经济)
作者
David S. Ludwig,Louis J. Aronne,Arne Astrup,Rafael de Cabo,Lewis C. Cantley,Mark I. Friedman,Steven B. Heymsfield,James D. Johnson,Janet C. King,Ronald M. Krauss,Daniel E. Lieberman,Gary Taubes,Jeff S. Volek,Eric C. Westman,Walter C. Willett,William S. Yancy,Cara B. Ebbeling
摘要
According to a commonly held view, the obesity pandemic is caused by overconsumption of modern, highly palatable, energy-dense processed foods, exacerbated by a sedentary lifestyle. However, obesity rates remain at historic highs, despite a persistent focus on eating less and moving more, as guided by the energy balance model (EBM). This public health failure may arise from a fundamental limitation of the EBM itself. Conceptualizing obesity as a disorder of energy balance restates a principle of physics without considering the biological mechanisms that promote weight gain. An alternative paradigm, the carbohydrate-insulin model (CIM), proposes a reversal of causal direction. According to the CIM, increasing fat deposition in the body-resulting from the hormonal responses to a high-glycemic-load diet-drives positive energy balance. The CIM provides a conceptual framework with testable hypotheses for how various modifiable factors influence energy balance and fat storage. Rigorous research is needed to compare the validity of these 2 models, which have substantially different implications for obesity management, and to generate new models that best encompass the evidence.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI