Assessment of Intercostal Nerve Block Analgesia for Thoracic Surgery

医学 肋间神经 心胸外科 艾司洛尔 开胸手术 麻醉 神经阻滞 外科 胸腔镜检查 止痛药 指南 科克伦图书馆 观察研究 随机对照试验 内科学 血压 病理 心率
作者
Carlos E. Guerra-Londono,Ann Privorotskiy,Crispiana Cozowicz,Rachel S. Hicklen,Stavros G. Memtsoudis,Edward R. Mariano,Juan P. Cata
出处
期刊:JAMA network open [American Medical Association]
卷期号:4 (11): e2133394-e2133394 被引量:54
标识
DOI:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.33394
摘要

The use of intercostal nerve block (ICNB) analgesia with local anesthesia is common in thoracic surgery. However, the benefits and safety of ICNB among adult patients undergoing surgery is unknown.To evaluate the analgesic benefits and safety of ICNB among adults undergoing thoracic surgery.A systematic search was performed in Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid Embase, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library databases using terms for ICNB and thoracic surgery (including thoracic surgery, thoracoscopy, thoracotomy, nerve block, intercostal nerves). The search and results were not limited by date, with the last search conducted on July 24, 2020.Selected studies were experimental or observational and included adult patients undergoing cardiothoracic surgery in which ICNB was administered with local anesthesia via single injection, continuous infusion, or a combination of both techniques in at least 1 group of patients. For comparison with ICNB, studies that examined systemic analgesia and different forms of regional analgesia (such as thoracic epidural analgesia [TEA], paravertebral block [PVB], and other techniques) were included. These criteria were applied independently by 2 authors, and discrepancies were resolved by consensus. A total of 694 records were selected for screening.This study followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) reporting guideline. Data including patient characteristics, type of surgery, intervention analgesia, comparison analgesia, and primary and secondary outcomes were extracted independently by 3 authors. Synthesis was performed using a fixed-effects model.The coprimary outcomes were postoperative pain intensity (measured as the worst static or dynamic pain using a validated 10-point scale, with 0 indicating no pain and 10 indicating severe pain) and opioid consumption (measured in morphine milligram equivalents [MMEs]) at prespecified intervals (0-6 hours, 7-24 hours, 25-48 hours, 49-72 hours, and >72 hours). Clinically relevant analgesia was defined as a 1-point or greater difference in pain intensity score at any interval. Secondary outcomes included 30-day postoperative complications and pulmonary function.Of 694 records screened, 608 were excluded based on prespecified exclusion criteria. The remaining 86 full-text articles were assessed for eligibility, and 20 of those articles were excluded. All of the 66 remaining studies (5184 patients; mean [SD] age, 53.9 [10.2] years; approximately 59% men and 41% women) were included in the qualitative analysis, and 59 studies (3325 patients) that provided data for at least 1 outcome were included in the quantitative meta-analysis. Experimental studies had a high risk of bias in multiple domains, including allocation concealment, blinding of participants and personnel, and blinding of outcome assessors. Marked differences (eg, crossover studies, timing of the intervention [intraoperative vs postoperative], blinding, and type of control group) were observed in the design and implementation of studies. The use of ICNB vs systemic analgesia was associated with lower static pain (0-6 hours after surgery: mean score difference, -1.40 points [95% CI, -1.46 to -1.33 points]; 7-24 hours after surgery: mean score difference, -1.27 points [95% CI, -1.40 to -1.13 points]) and lower dynamic pain (0-6 hours after surgery: mean score difference, -1.66 points [95% CI, -1.90 to -1.41 points]; 7-24 hours after surgery: mean score difference, -1.43 points [95% CI, -1.70 to -1.17 points]). Intercostal nerve block analgesia was noninferior to TEA (mean score difference in worst dynamic panic at 7-24 hours after surgery: 0.79 points; 95% CI, 0.28-1.29 points) and marginally inferior to PVB (mean score difference in worst dynamic pain at 7-24 hours after surgery: 1.29 points; 95% CI, 1.16 to 1.41 points). The largest opioid-sparing effect of ICNB vs systemic analgesia occurred at 48 hours after surgery (mean difference, -10.97 MMEs; 95% CI, -12.92 to -9.02 MMEs). The use of ICNB was associated with higher MME values compared with TEA (eg, 48 hours after surgery: mean difference, 48.31 MMEs; 95% CI, 36.11-60.52 MMEs) and PVB (eg, 48 hours after surgery: mean difference, 3.87 MMEs; 95% CI, 2.59-5.15 MMEs).In this study, single-injection ICNB was associated with a reduction in pain during the first 24 hours after thoracic surgery and was clinically noninferior to TEA or PVB. Intercostal nerve block analgesia had opioid-sparing effects; however, TEA and PVB were associated with larger decreases in postoperative MMEs, suggesting that ICNB may be most beneficial for cases in which TEA and PVB are not indicated.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
大幅提高文件上传限制,最高150M (2024-4-1)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
老夫子发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
kkfly完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
米豆garrrr发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
yema完成签到 ,获得积分10
5秒前
5秒前
7秒前
张梦发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
高贵的洋葱完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
秋雪瑶应助ZX0501采纳,获得10
7秒前
上官若男应助琳琅采纳,获得10
8秒前
李爱国应助老夫子采纳,获得20
8秒前
飞龙在天完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
Ava应助edsenone采纳,获得10
11秒前
顾矜应助陶醉觅夏采纳,获得10
12秒前
13秒前
14秒前
15秒前
15秒前
wanghaiyang发布了新的文献求助10
17秒前
18秒前
ZX0501发布了新的文献求助10
19秒前
zxj发布了新的文献求助10
20秒前
猩猩完成签到,获得积分10
21秒前
21秒前
23秒前
小蘑菇应助edsenone采纳,获得10
24秒前
25秒前
猩猩发布了新的文献求助10
25秒前
kingebo完成签到,获得积分10
25秒前
小王完成签到,获得积分10
25秒前
xia完成签到,获得积分10
27秒前
Alex发布了新的文献求助10
28秒前
29秒前
陶醉觅夏发布了新的文献求助10
30秒前
30秒前
小二郎应助大力的迎松采纳,获得10
30秒前
31秒前
lemshine完成签到,获得积分10
32秒前
美丽千万完成签到,获得积分10
33秒前
任性的天空完成签到 ,获得积分10
35秒前
高分求助中
请在求助之前详细阅读求助说明!!!! 20000
One Man Talking: Selected Essays of Shao Xunmei, 1929–1939 1000
Yuwu Song, Biographical Dictionary of the People's Republic of China 700
[Lambert-Eaton syndrome without calcium channel autoantibodies] 520
Pressing the Fight: Print, Propaganda, and the Cold War 500
Bernd Ziesemer - Maos deutscher Topagent: Wie China die Bundesrepublik eroberte 500
The Three Stars Each: The Astrolabes and Related Texts 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 有机化学 工程类 生物化学 纳米技术 物理 内科学 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 遗传学 基因 物理化学 催化作用 电极 光电子学 量子力学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 2470871
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 2137600
关于积分的说明 5446785
捐赠科研通 1861599
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 925834
版权声明 562721
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 495246