医学
痉挛
随机对照试验
电针
物理疗法
改良阿什沃思量表
冲程(发动机)
不利影响
日常生活活动
临床试验
物理医学与康复
针灸科
外科
内科学
替代医学
机械工程
病理
工程类
作者
Yiyi Cai,Claire Shuiqing Zhang,Anthony Lin Zhang,Cliff Da Costa,Charlie Changli Xue,Zehuai Wen
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2020.07.034
摘要
People with spasticity that occurred between 30 days and one year after stroke onset with a baseline Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) ≥1.To determine the practicality of a pragmatic parallel-group open-labeled randomized controlled trial and to collect preliminary data of effectiveness and safety of electroacupuncture (EA) for poststroke spasticity.Eligible participants were randomly allocated to the intervention group (EA plus usual care) or the control group (usual care alone) at a 1:1 ratio with block sizes of six. Participants received EA three times a week for four weeks, then were followed up for another four weeks. Participants' retention and adherence in the trial were assessed to determine the practicality of trial design. Clinical outcome measures were the change scores of MAS, Fugl-Meyer Assessment of motor performance and Barthel Index, and adverse events.Seventy-two people were screened for eligibility, and 30 of them were recruited and randomized. At the end, 25 participants followed the trial protocol and were included in our final data analyses using an intention-to-treat approach. No significant between-group difference was detected for the change scores of MAS, Fugl-Meyer Assessment, or Barthel Index at the end of treatment or end of follow-up. Eighteen participants reported 37 adverse events, but none of the participants was deemed related to EA.It is feasible to conduct a full-scale trial to precisely evaluate the effectiveness and safety of EA for treating poststroke spasticity; however, longer treatment and follow-up phases should be considered in the full-scale trial.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI