Safety and Tolerability of Gabapentin as Adjunctive Therapy in a Large, Multicenter Study

作者
Michael J. McLean,Martha J. Morrell,L. James Willmore,Michael Privitera,Edward Faught,Gregory L. Holmes,Leslie Magnus‐Miller,Paula Bernstein,Andrea Rose‐Legatt
出处
期刊:Epilepsia [Wiley]
卷期号:40 (7): 965-972 被引量:82
标识
DOI:10.1111/j.1528-1157.1999.tb00804.x
摘要

PURPOSE: To evaluate the tolerability and safety of gabapentin (GBP) as add-on therapy for seizure control. METHODS: Conducted in an outpatient setting and reflecting usual practice, this study compared tolerability of GBP dosages < or = 1,800 versus >1,800 mg/day, when these doses were required to achieve the most effective seizure control. Two analyses of adverse events are presented: tolerability and safety. In the tolerability analysis, each patient served as his or her own control to compare the occurrence of adverse events at GBP < or =1,800 versus >1,800 mg/day. The safety analysis required patients to receive at least one dose of GBP and have a follow-up contact. RESULTS: A total of 2,216 patients enrolled in this open-label, 16-week study and were evaluable for safety. Of these, 74.0% completed the 16-week study, and 281 met the tolerability criteria. Within these 281 patients, two mutually exclusive groups were compared (a) those reporting adverse events at only < or =1,800 mg/day (low dose); and (b) those reporting adverse events at only >1,800 mg/day (high dose). Three adverse events (asthenia, headache, and dizziness) were observed in a statistically significantly larger number of patients at only the low dose than in the group reporting these same adverse events at only the high dose, suggesting that patients who tolerated GBP at < or = 1,800 mg/day did not experience a significant increase in adverse events with dosages >1,800 mg/day. Overall, 10.6% of the 2,216 patients in the safety population prematurely withdrew because of adverse events, and 3.5% discontinued because of lack of efficacy. Safety and tolerability of GBP was rated as excellent or good for 78.5% of all patients. CONCLUSIONS: Gabapentin doses >1,800 mg/day were as well tolerated as doses < or =1,800 mg/day and were not associated with more adverse events.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
刚刚
honeymoon完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
ccrr完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
1秒前
1秒前
脑洞疼应助zlren采纳,获得10
1秒前
Cml完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
芝士雪豹完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
orixero应助FadedTulips采纳,获得10
1秒前
1秒前
2秒前
cy发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
背后的宛秋完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
azo完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
dadadasds发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
Akim应助风-FBDD采纳,获得10
2秒前
共享精神应助Tchag采纳,获得10
2秒前
Jasper应助莲花庙里吃苹果采纳,获得10
3秒前
3秒前
3秒前
达到顶峰完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
着急的问凝完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
汉堡包应助耍酷楼房采纳,获得10
4秒前
莉莉完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
Ava应助不倦采纳,获得10
4秒前
4秒前
zeck发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
李健应助科研小南采纳,获得10
4秒前
王师雨完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
5秒前
dde发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
WW发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
超级铅笔发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
6秒前
带上琳的眼睛应助Momo采纳,获得10
6秒前
yy完成签到,获得积分20
6秒前
liuhll发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
WNL发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
yan发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
7秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Römisch-Germanische Forschungen 1000
China Pluperfect I: Epistemology of Past and Outside in Chinese Art 520
Matrix Methods in Data Mining and Pattern Recognition Second Edition 510
The fast track to determining transfer functions of linear circuits: The student guide 500
The Analytical and Numerical Solution of Electric and Magnetic Fields 500
Green Fire Retardants for Polymeric Materials 400
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7615635
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9190903
关于积分的说明 19694143
捐赠科研通 7188200
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3271416
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2434568
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2266456