亲爱的研友该休息了!由于当前在线用户较少,发布求助请尽量完整的填写文献信息,科研通机器人24小时在线,伴您度过漫漫科研夜!身体可是革命的本钱,早点休息,好梦!

Multi-attribute decision making: A simulation comparison of select methods

埃克力 托普西斯 加权 数学 层次分析法 数学优化 相似性(几何) 乘法函数 决策矩阵 多准则决策分析 计算机科学 统计 运筹学 人工智能 医学 数学分析 图像(数学) 放射科
作者
Stelios H. Zanakis,Anthony W. Solomon,Nicole Wishart,Sandipa Dublish
出处
期刊:European Journal of Operational Research [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:107 (3): 507-529 被引量:934
标识
DOI:10.1016/s0377-2217(97)00147-1
摘要

Several methods have been proposed for solving multi-attribute decision making problems (MADM). A major criticism of MADM is that different techniques may yield different results when applied to the same problem. The problem considered in this study consists of a decision matrix input of N criteria weights and ratings of L alternatives on each criterion. The comparative performance of some methods has been investigated in a few, mostly field, studies. In this simulation experiment we investigate the performance of eight methods: ELECTRE, TOPSIS, Multiplicative Exponential Weighting (MEW), Simple Additive Weighting (SAW), and four versions of AHP (original vs. geometric scale and right eigenvector vs. mean transformation solution). Simulation parameters are the number of alternatives, criteria and their distribution. The solutions are analyzed using twelve measures of similarity of performance. Similarities and differences in the behavior of these methods are investigated. Dissimilarities in weights produced by these methods become stronger in problems with few alternatives; however, the corresponding final rankings of the alternatives vary across methods more in problems with many alternatives. Although less significant, the distribution of criterion weights affects the methods differently. In general, all AHP versions behave similarly and closer to SAW than the other methods. ELECTRE is the least similar to SAW (except for closer matching the top-ranked alternative), followed by MEW. TOPSIS behaves closer to AHP and differently from ELECTRE and MEW, except for problems with few criteria. A similar rank-reversal experiment produced the following performance order of methods: SAW and MEW (best), followed by TOPSIS, AHPs and ELECTRE. It should be noted that the ELECTRE version used was adapted to the common MADM problem and therefore it did not take advantage of the method's capabilities in handling problems with ordinal or imprecise information.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
iceink发布了新的文献求助200
16秒前
24秒前
科研通AI2S应助璇别采纳,获得10
25秒前
JamesPei应助threewei采纳,获得10
52秒前
1分钟前
threewei发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
MchemG完成签到,获得积分0
1分钟前
汉堡包应助天真咖啡豆采纳,获得10
1分钟前
1分钟前
2分钟前
2分钟前
2分钟前
2分钟前
getgetting发布了新的文献求助10
2分钟前
flytowm发布了新的文献求助10
2分钟前
2分钟前
bc应助科研通管家采纳,获得20
2分钟前
SciGPT应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
2分钟前
2分钟前
传奇3应助getgetting采纳,获得10
2分钟前
孤独的大灰狼完成签到 ,获得积分10
2分钟前
2分钟前
iman发布了新的文献求助30
3分钟前
3分钟前
一只羊完成签到 ,获得积分10
3分钟前
Dash发布了新的文献求助10
3分钟前
充电宝应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
4分钟前
科研通AI2S应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
4分钟前
bc应助科研通管家采纳,获得20
4分钟前
4分钟前
阿兰完成签到 ,获得积分10
4分钟前
5分钟前
韶沛凝完成签到,获得积分10
5分钟前
getgetting发布了新的文献求助10
5分钟前
6分钟前
田様应助getgetting采纳,获得10
6分钟前
zhang完成签到 ,获得积分10
8分钟前
星辰大海应助欣欣采纳,获得10
8分钟前
JLJT完成签到,获得积分10
8分钟前
getgetting完成签到,获得积分20
9分钟前
高分求助中
Introduction to Strong Mixing Conditions Volumes 1-3 500
Tip60 complex regulates eggshell formation and oviposition in the white-backed planthopper, providing effective targets for pest control 400
Optical and electric properties of monocrystalline synthetic diamond irradiated by neutrons 320
共融服務學習指南 300
Essentials of Pharmacoeconomics: Health Economics and Outcomes Research 3rd Edition. by Karen Rascati 300
Peking Blues // Liao San 300
Political Ideologies Their Origins and Impact 13 edition 240
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 内科学 复合材料 物理化学 电极 遗传学 量子力学 基因 冶金 催化作用
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3800920
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3346445
关于积分的说明 10329356
捐赠科研通 3062993
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1681307
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 807463
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 763714