医学
替罗非班
冲程(发动机)
内科学
队列
入射(几何)
子群分析
血运重建
安慰剂
逻辑回归
人口
混淆
心脏病学
置信区间
经皮冠状动脉介入治疗
心肌梗塞
病理
工程类
替代医学
物理
光学
环境卫生
机械工程
作者
Chengsong Yue,Xiang Liu,Changwei Guo,Lilan Wang,Wenlong Zhao,Wenzhe Sun,Jiaxing Song,Jie Yang,Linyu Li,Nizhen Yu,Shihai Yang,Xiaolei Shi,Jiacheng Huang,Weiling Kong,Zhenqiang Li,Shunyu Yang,Shuang Yang,Wenjie Zi,Yi Lin,Fengli Li
摘要
Abstract Background and Objectives Despite achieving ideal reperfusion (eTICI = 3) through endovascular treatment (EVT), some acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients still experience poor outcomes. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of tirofiban in AIS patients with ideal reperfusion, focusing on its effects in large artery atherosclerosis (LAA) and cardioembolic (CE) stroke. Methods A total of 474 AIS patients from the RESCUE‐BT database were included. Patients were assigned to either the tirofiban or placebo group based on the treatment received. The primary outcome was favorable functional recovery at 90 days (mRS ≤2), and safety outcomes included symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) and 90‐day mortality. Multivariable logistic regression was used to adjust for confounders, and subgroup and interaction analyses assessed tirofiban's efficacy in LAA and CE populations. Results In the overall population that achieved ideal reperfusion, Tirofiban did not improve clinical outcomes and did not increase the risk of mortality or incidence of sICH ( p > 0.05). However, subgroup analysis indicated potential clinical benefits for patients with higher NIHSS scores in the LAA group, especially in the subgroup with NIHSS scores >13 (adjusted OR 4.671, 95% CI [1.545, 14.122]). No significant differences were found in the CE group. Conclusions Tirofiban showed potential benefits for LAA patients with ideal reperfusion, especially those with NIHSS scores above 13. Careful patient selection is recommended.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI