Effects of Five Common Preparatory Approaches on Grand Jeté Biomechanics

Introduction: The grand jeté requires grace and proper biomechanics to produce the iconic glide through the air. Understanding how the preceding choreographed movements affect take-off and flight may influence teaching and training. We sought to examine the effects of 5 common preparatory approaches on grand jeté biomechanics. Methods: One male and 19 female dancers (19.3 ± 1.4 years; 1.61 ± 0.05 m; 58.1 ± 7.3 kg) with 12.5 ± 4.8 years of formal ballet experience performed grand jetés from run, chaine, chasse, assemble, and step-step approaches. Plié angle (deg), vGRF (BW), leap height (m), and leap distance (m) were measured with a motion analysis system and a force plate. One-way repeated measures ANOVAs were conducted to compare variables between approaches and Bonferroni tests were used for pairwise comparisons. Results: Plié depth, vGRF, leap height, and leap distance were all significantly different ( P < .001). Plié angles (43.6-68.2 deg) were deepest for the assemble and shallowest for the run. vGRF (2.46-3.81 BW) were greatest for the assemble versus all but the run, and smallest for the chaine. Leap height (0.33-0.41 m) was highest for the run versus the chaine and step-step, but not versus assemble. Height was lowest for the chaine. Leap distance (0.24-1.03 m) was longest for the run and shortest for the assemble. Conclusions: The run approach optimizes the float through the air illusion (high leap height and distance) through applying high vGRF but moderate plié angles. The chasse approach is the next most optimal. The 2-legged assemble requires deeper plié angles to achieve height but produces shorter horizontal distances. Single leg plié training may enhance grand jeté performance and reduce injury risk from approaches such as the run, chaine, chasse, and step-step. Level of Evidence: Level 2