Clear Aligners in Extraction‐Based Orthodontic Treatment: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis

作者
Sarah Abu Arqub,Harsh Chheda,Jennifer Crumpton,Xianrui Yang,Philip Farha,Madhur Upadhyay
出处
期刊:Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research [Wiley]
标识
DOI:10.1111/ocr.70052
摘要

ABSTRACT This systematic review and meta‐analysis aimed to evaluate the predictability of tooth movement, and clinical effectiveness of clear aligners in extraction‐based orthodontic therapy. A comprehensive search of seven electronic databases (PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CINAHL and ProQuest) was conducted up to April 19, 2025, adhering to PRISMA guidelines. Eligible studies included prospective and retrospective designs assessing clear aligner treatment in patients aged ≥ 12 years with premolar extractions. Primary outcomes encompassed predicted versus achieved tooth movement and root angulation/parallelism, with secondary outcomes including treatment duration and clinical indices (American Board of Orthodontics Objective Grading System [ABO‐OGS], Peer Assessment Rating [PAR]). Risk of bias was evaluated using the Swedish Council on Technology Assessment in Health Care (SBU) grading system and Centre for Reviews and Dissemination (CRD) criteria. Random‐effects meta‐analyses were performed for homogeneous outcomes. Twenty studies (536 aligner patients, 173 fixed appliance patients) were included. Meta‐analyses revealed significant discrepancies between predicted and achieved movements, including excessive mesial tipping of maxillary first molars (mean difference: −6.08°, 95% CI: −7.89 to −4.26). Under‐retraction (−1.93 mm, 95% CI: −2.15 to −1.71), and increased vertical displacement of maxillary incisors. Root divergence and anchorage loss were prevalent. Compared to fixed appliances, aligners exhibited inferior root control and occlusal contact scores. Four randomised controlled trials provided high‐quality evidence, but the predominance of retrospective studies contributed to a moderate risk of bias. Clear aligners demonstrate biomechanical limitations in achieving precise root control and bodily movement in extraction cases, necessitating strategic overcorrections and adjunctive mechanics. Trial Registration: PROSPERO (CRD42024613540)
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
YHK发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
1秒前
orixero应助茜茜采纳,获得10
1秒前
2秒前
闪闪的诗珊应助吱唔朱采纳,获得20
2秒前
搜集达人应助卧镁铀钳采纳,获得10
4秒前
8秒前
9秒前
脑洞疼应助义气莫茗采纳,获得10
10秒前
10秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助50
12秒前
科研狗发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
13秒前
Z170完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
14秒前
Jenny完成签到 ,获得积分10
14秒前
14秒前
想人陪的晓刚完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
醒醒完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
wanci应助蓝叶采纳,获得10
15秒前
拼搏向前发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
16秒前
完美世界应助雨淋沐风采纳,获得10
16秒前
自觉的帽子完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
哈兰发布了新的文献求助10
18秒前
huanghanjing完成签到,获得积分10
18秒前
Cancey发布了新的文献求助10
19秒前
醒醒发布了新的文献求助10
19秒前
我是老大应助科研狗采纳,获得10
20秒前
嘿嘿完成签到 ,获得积分20
20秒前
王粒伊完成签到,获得积分10
21秒前
123321发布了新的文献求助10
21秒前
YZQ完成签到,获得积分10
21秒前
逐梦深蓝完成签到,获得积分20
22秒前
义气莫茗发布了新的文献求助10
23秒前
思源应助哈哈采纳,获得10
24秒前
所所应助YHK采纳,获得10
24秒前
25秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Encyclopedia of Quaternary Science Reference Third edition 6000
Encyclopedia of Forensic and Legal Medicine Third Edition 5000
Introduction to strong mixing conditions volume 1-3 5000
Aerospace Engineering Education During the First Century of Flight 3000
Agyptische Geschichte der 21.30. Dynastie 3000
Les Mantodea de guyane 2000
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 生物 医学 工程类 计算机科学 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 复合材料 内科学 化学工程 人工智能 催化作用 遗传学 数学 基因 量子力学 物理化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 5786640
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 5695058
关于积分的说明 15470262
捐赠科研通 4915463
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2645721
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1593478
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1547800