Comparing the Efficacy of Sirolimus and Paclitaxel-Eluting Balloon Catheters in the Treatment of Coronary In-Stent Restenosis: A Prospective Randomized Study (TIS 2 Study)

BACKGROUND: Current therapy for in-stent restenosis (ISR) is based on drug-eluting stents (DES) or drug-eluting balloon catheters. This prospective randomized study compared the efficacy of a novel sirolimus-eluting balloon (SEB) catheter to that of a paclitaxel-eluting balloon (PEB) catheter for the treatment of bare-metal stent (BMS-ISR) or DES-ISR restenosis. METHODS: A total of 145 patients with 158 BMS or DES-ISR lesions were randomly assigned to the treatment with either SEB or PEB. The in-segment late lumen loss at 12 months, the 12-month incidence of binary ISR, and major adverse cardiac events (cardiac death, nonfatal acute myocardial infarction, or target lesion revascularization) were compared between groups. RESULTS: The noninferiority of SEB compared with PEB in the treatment of BMS/DES-ISR with respect to late lumen loss was not demonstrated (Δlate lumen loss, −0.024 mm [95% CI, −0.277 to 0.229]; for a noninferiority margin of 0.20 mm), except in the post hoc subanalysis for the BMS-ISR group (−0.203 mm [95% CI, −0.584 to 0.178]). No significant differences in the incidence of repeated binary ISR (31.6% versus 30.4%, P =0.906) or 12-month major adverse cardiac events (31% for both; P >0.999) between the SEB and PEB groups were observed. CONCLUSIONS: The noninferiority of SEB relative to PEB in the treatment of BMS/DES-ISR with respect to late lumen loss was not confirmed. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT03672656.