医学
阿替唑单抗
随机对照试验
肿瘤科
结直肠癌
临床终点
内科学
放化疗
新辅助治疗
外科
完全响应
临床研究阶段
不利影响
总体生存率
存活率
作者
Wentao Tang,Aiwen Wu,Ping Lan,Kefeng Ding,Zhenning Wang,Jian Wang,N. Chen,Xianrui Wu,Yurong Jiao,Funan Liu,Tong Li,Y. Shi,Jianmin Xu
摘要
PURPOSE Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) is the standard treatment for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC); however, pathologic complete response (pCR) rates and long-term outcomes remain suboptimal. This study evaluated the safety and efficacy of atezolizumab (Atezo) with or without tiragolumab (Tira) after nCRT in patients with LARC. METHODS This randomized, parallel-group, phase II study included a safety run-in and a subsequent randomized phase. Eligible patients (cT3N+M0 or cT4NanyM0) received long-course nCRT (45-50.4 Gy in 25-28 fractions with concurrent capecitabine), followed by three 21-day cycles of Atezo (1,200 mg once on day 1 of each cycle), either combined with Tira (600 mg; Atezo + Tira arm) or alone (Atezo arm). Radical surgery was performed 2 weeks after final dose. The primary end point was pCR rate. Secondary end points included 1-year event-free survival (EFS) rate and safety. Outcomes were compared with historical controls. RESULTS At data cutoff (January 6, 2025), three patients were enrolled in safety run-in and received Atezo + Tira. In randomized phase, 55 patients were assigned 1:1 to Atezo + Tira arm (n = 28) or Atezo arm (n = 27). pCR rate was 35.7% (95% CI, 18.6 to 55.9; v historical control [15%] P = .002) in Atezo + Tira arm and 22.2% (95% CI, 8.6 to 42.3; v historical control [15%] P = .293) in Atezo arm. After a median follow-up of 21.55 months (range, 20.67-22.24), 1-year EFS rates were 96.3% (95% CI, 76.5 to 99.5) in Atezo + Tira arm and 92.1% (95% CI, 72.1 to 98.0) in Atezo arm. Grade 3 to 4 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 31.0% and 26.9%. Grade 3 to 4 AEs related to Atezo or Tira were 10.3% and 11.5%, respectively. No treatment-emergent deaths were reported. CONCLUSION In patients with LARC, Atezo + Tira after nCRT statistically improved the pCR rate compared with historical controls, with an acceptable safety profile.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI