Gas exchange and lung mechanics in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome: Comparison of three different strategies of positive end expiratory pressure selection

The purpose of the study was to compare gas exchange and lung mechanics between different strategies to select positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS).In 20 consecutive ARDS patients, 3 PEEP selection strategies were evaluated. One strategy was based on oxygenation using the ARDS network PEEP/fraction of inspired oxygen (Fio2) table; and two were based on lung mechanics, either PEEP titrated to reach a plateau pressure of 28 to 30 cm H2O as in the ExPress trial or best respiratory compliance method during a derecruitment maneuver. Gas exchange, airway pressures, stress index (SI), and end-expiratory transpulmonary pressure (P(tpe)) and end-inspiratory transpulmonary pressure (P(tpi)) values were assessed. Data are expressed as median (interquartile range [IQR]).Lower total PEEP levels were observed with the use of the PEEP/Fio2 table (8.7 [6-10] cm H2O); intermediate PEEP levels, with the Best Compliance approach (13.0 [10.2-13.8] cm H2O); and higher PEEP levels, with the ExPress strategy (16.5 [15.0-18.5] cm H2O) (P < .01). Pao2/Fio2 ratio was lower with the PEEP/Fio2 table. Oxygenation with Best Compliance approach and ExPress strategy was not different with lower plateau pressure in the former (23 [20-25] vs 30 [29-30] cm H2O; P < .01). Paco2 was slightly higher with the ExPress method than the others 2 strategies. Negative P(tpe) was observed in 35% of the patients with the PEEP/Fio2 table, in 15% applying the Best Compliance, and in only 1 case with the ExPress method. Higher SI and P(tpi), with lower lung compliance, were obtained with ExPress strategy.Using a best respiratory compliance approach resulted in better oxygenation levels without risk of overdistension according to SI and P(tpi), achieving a mild risk of lung collapse according to P(tpe).