Access to cancer medicines deemed essential by oncologists in 82 countries: an international, cross-sectional survey

医学 雪球取样 基本药物 获得药品 横断面研究 家庭医学 描述性统计 公共卫生 全球卫生 癌症 环境卫生 替代医学 发展中国家 护理部 经济增长 病理 统计 数学 内科学 经济
作者
Adam Fundytus,Manju Sengar,Dorothy Lombe,Wilma M. Hopman,Matthew Jalink,Bishal Gyawali,Dario Trapani,Felipe Roitberg,Elisabeth G.E. de Vries,Lorenzo Moja,André Ilbawi,Richard Sullivan,Christopher M. Booth
出处
期刊:Lancet Oncology [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:22 (10): 1367-1377 被引量:148
标识
DOI:10.1016/s1470-2045(21)00463-0
摘要

The WHO Essential Medicines List (EML) identifies priority medicines that are most important to public health. Over time, the EML has included an increasing number of cancer medicines. We aimed to investigate whether the cancer medicines in the EML are aligned with the priority medicines of frontline oncologists worldwide, and the extent to which these medicines are accessible in routine clinical practice.This international, cross-sectional survey was developed by investigators from a range of clinical practice settings across low-income to high-income countries, including members of the WHO Essential Medicines Cancer Working Group. A 28-question electronic survey was developed and disseminated to a global network of oncologists in 89 countries and regions by use of a hierarchical snowball method; each primary contact distributed the survey through their national and regional oncology associations or personal networks. The survey was open from Oct 15 to Dec 7, 2020. Fully qualified physicians who prescribe systemic anticancer therapy to adults were eligible to participate in the survey. The primary question asked respondents to select the ten cancer medicines that would provide the greatest public health benefit to their country; subsequent questions explored availability and cost of cancer medicines. Descriptive statistics were used to compare access to medicines between low-income and lower-middle-income countries, upper-middle-income countries, and high-income countries.87 country-level contacts and two regional networks were invited to participate in the survey; 46 (52%) accepted the invitation and distributed the survey. 1697 respondents opened the survey link; 423 were excluded as they did not answer the primary study question and 326 were excluded because of ineligibility. 948 eligible oncologists from 82 countries completed the survey (165 [17%] in low-income and lower-middle-income countries, 165 [17%] in upper-middle-income countries, and 618 [65%] in high-income countries). The most commonly selected medicines were doxorubicin (by 499 [53%] of 948 respondents), cisplatin (by 470 [50%]), paclitaxel (by 423 [45%]), pembrolizumab (by 414 [44%]), trastuzumab (by 402 [42%]), carboplatin (by 390 [41%]), and 5-fluorouracil (by 386 [41%]). Of the 20 most frequently selected high-priority cancer medicines, 19 (95%) are currently on the WHO EML; 12 (60%) were cytotoxic agents and 13 (65%) were granted US Food and Drug Administration regulatory approval before 2000. The proportion of respondents indicating universal availability of each top 20 medication was 9-54% in low-income and lower-middle-income countries, 13-90% in upper-middle-income countries, and 68-94% in high-income countries. The risk of catastrophic expenditure (spending >40% of total consumption net of spending on food) was more common in low-income and lower-middle-income countries, with 13-68% of respondents indicating a substantial risk of catastrophic expenditures for each of the top 20 medications in lower-middle-income countries versus 2-41% of respondents in upper-middle-income countries and 0-9% in high-income countries.These data demonstrate major barriers in access to core cancer medicines worldwide. These findings challenge the feasibility of adding additional expensive cancer medicines to the EML. There is an urgent need for global and country-level policy action to ensure patients with cancer globally have access to high priority medicines.None.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
tingting完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
5秒前
等待的幼晴完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
玛卡巴卡完成签到 ,获得积分10
7秒前
11秒前
13秒前
花深粥完成签到 ,获得积分10
16秒前
木水水发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
樂楽完成签到,获得积分10
19秒前
研友_西门孤晴完成签到,获得积分10
20秒前
香菜张完成签到,获得积分10
26秒前
hcdb完成签到,获得积分10
26秒前
噜噜噜噜噜完成签到,获得积分10
28秒前
Setlla完成签到 ,获得积分10
29秒前
31秒前
Lucas应助木水水采纳,获得10
31秒前
zyf完成签到 ,获得积分10
31秒前
36秒前
40秒前
风雨霖霖完成签到 ,获得积分10
41秒前
曾予嘉完成签到 ,获得积分10
42秒前
42秒前
46秒前
文献小白完成签到 ,获得积分10
46秒前
木卫二完成签到 ,获得积分10
47秒前
ChrisYang完成签到,获得积分10
48秒前
Wenjing完成签到 ,获得积分10
53秒前
Ying完成签到,获得积分10
56秒前
顾矜应助丰富水云采纳,获得10
58秒前
1分钟前
悬铃木完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
George发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
青山完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
身体健康完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
w0r1d完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
小石榴的爸爸完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
JSEILWQ完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
George完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
zhang568完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
1分钟前
高分求助中
液晶指向矢仿真分析数据集 8888
GL 2 A method for assessing the in-place cleanability of food processing equipment, Fourth Edition, December 2023 3000
Ideology and Meaning-Making under the Putin Regime 750
Annie Ernaux: De la perte au corps glorieux 600
Petrology and Plate Tectonics 500
Writing Systems 500
A Handbook of User Experience Research & Design in Libraries 400
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 物理 内科学 复合材料 催化作用 物理化学 光电子学 电极 细胞生物学 基因 无机化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6852866
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8558589
关于积分的说明 18200112
捐赠科研通 6212872
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3044644
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2040882
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2022078