Access to cancer medicines deemed essential by oncologists in 82 countries: an international, cross-sectional survey

医学 雪球取样 基本药物 获得药品 横断面研究 家庭医学 描述性统计 公共卫生 全球卫生 癌症 环境卫生 替代医学 发展中国家 护理部 经济增长 病理 统计 内科学 经济 数学
作者
Adam Fundytus,Manju Sengar,Dorothy Lombe,Wilma M. Hopman,Matthew Jalink,Bishal Gyawali,Dario Trapani,Felipe Roitberg,Elisabeth G.E. de Vries,Lorenzo Moja,André Ilbawi,Richard Sullivan,Christopher M. Booth
出处
期刊:Lancet Oncology [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:22 (10): 1367-1377 被引量:113
标识
DOI:10.1016/s1470-2045(21)00463-0
摘要

The WHO Essential Medicines List (EML) identifies priority medicines that are most important to public health. Over time, the EML has included an increasing number of cancer medicines. We aimed to investigate whether the cancer medicines in the EML are aligned with the priority medicines of frontline oncologists worldwide, and the extent to which these medicines are accessible in routine clinical practice.This international, cross-sectional survey was developed by investigators from a range of clinical practice settings across low-income to high-income countries, including members of the WHO Essential Medicines Cancer Working Group. A 28-question electronic survey was developed and disseminated to a global network of oncologists in 89 countries and regions by use of a hierarchical snowball method; each primary contact distributed the survey through their national and regional oncology associations or personal networks. The survey was open from Oct 15 to Dec 7, 2020. Fully qualified physicians who prescribe systemic anticancer therapy to adults were eligible to participate in the survey. The primary question asked respondents to select the ten cancer medicines that would provide the greatest public health benefit to their country; subsequent questions explored availability and cost of cancer medicines. Descriptive statistics were used to compare access to medicines between low-income and lower-middle-income countries, upper-middle-income countries, and high-income countries.87 country-level contacts and two regional networks were invited to participate in the survey; 46 (52%) accepted the invitation and distributed the survey. 1697 respondents opened the survey link; 423 were excluded as they did not answer the primary study question and 326 were excluded because of ineligibility. 948 eligible oncologists from 82 countries completed the survey (165 [17%] in low-income and lower-middle-income countries, 165 [17%] in upper-middle-income countries, and 618 [65%] in high-income countries). The most commonly selected medicines were doxorubicin (by 499 [53%] of 948 respondents), cisplatin (by 470 [50%]), paclitaxel (by 423 [45%]), pembrolizumab (by 414 [44%]), trastuzumab (by 402 [42%]), carboplatin (by 390 [41%]), and 5-fluorouracil (by 386 [41%]). Of the 20 most frequently selected high-priority cancer medicines, 19 (95%) are currently on the WHO EML; 12 (60%) were cytotoxic agents and 13 (65%) were granted US Food and Drug Administration regulatory approval before 2000. The proportion of respondents indicating universal availability of each top 20 medication was 9-54% in low-income and lower-middle-income countries, 13-90% in upper-middle-income countries, and 68-94% in high-income countries. The risk of catastrophic expenditure (spending >40% of total consumption net of spending on food) was more common in low-income and lower-middle-income countries, with 13-68% of respondents indicating a substantial risk of catastrophic expenditures for each of the top 20 medications in lower-middle-income countries versus 2-41% of respondents in upper-middle-income countries and 0-9% in high-income countries.These data demonstrate major barriers in access to core cancer medicines worldwide. These findings challenge the feasibility of adding additional expensive cancer medicines to the EML. There is an urgent need for global and country-level policy action to ensure patients with cancer globally have access to high priority medicines.None.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
CodeCraft应助guozizi采纳,获得10
刚刚
awslsdl发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
2秒前
3秒前
4秒前
5秒前
6秒前
Haicheng完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
123完成签到 ,获得积分10
7秒前
7秒前
ban发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
8秒前
Litianxue发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
ttt发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
DOCTORLI发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
李健应助fj采纳,获得10
9秒前
11秒前
明亮幻露完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
JGchen完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
ning发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
13秒前
无语的冰旋完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
13秒前
zzz应助FelixChen采纳,获得50
13秒前
怡然铃铛发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
Ytion发布了新的文献求助20
14秒前
DOCTORLI完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
14秒前
从容的以蓝完成签到 ,获得积分10
15秒前
hh完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
Akim应助小药师采纳,获得10
16秒前
嫩牛五方发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
仲夏完成签到 ,获得积分10
16秒前
18秒前
CodeCraft应助Litianxue采纳,获得10
18秒前
丘比特应助hush采纳,获得10
18秒前
明亮幻露发布了新的文献求助10
19秒前
20秒前
20秒前
冰魂应助yueyue3SCI采纳,获得20
21秒前
高分求助中
Basic Discrete Mathematics 1000
Technologies supporting mass customization of apparel: A pilot project 600
Introduction to Strong Mixing Conditions Volumes 1-3 500
Tip60 complex regulates eggshell formation and oviposition in the white-backed planthopper, providing effective targets for pest control 400
A Field Guide to the Amphibians and Reptiles of Madagascar - Frank Glaw and Miguel Vences - 3rd Edition 400
China Gadabouts: New Frontiers of Humanitarian Nursing, 1941–51 400
The Healthy Socialist Life in Maoist China, 1949–1980 400
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 内科学 复合材料 物理化学 电极 遗传学 量子力学 基因 冶金 催化作用
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3799773
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3345093
关于积分的说明 10323514
捐赠科研通 3061617
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1680474
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 807090
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 763462