煤仓
蒙特卡罗方法
电磁屏蔽
直线粒子加速器
梁(结构)
计算机科学
物理
医学物理学
核工程
计算物理学
模拟
统计
数学
工程类
光学
量子力学
煤
废物管理
作者
James Rijken,Sam Towns,Brendan Healy
标识
DOI:10.1088/1361-6498/ac2e0b
摘要
Abstract Linear accelerator bunker shielding protocols such as NCRP 151 have previously been tested against a large sample of measured data from real bunkers and machines but differences in per-energy concrete penetration (TVLs) for 10 MV has not yet been resolved. These differences are likely due to historical beam data and can potentially result in over-exposure of radiation workers and the public. This study examines a cohort of clinical linac bunker survey measurements and compares them to popular shielding protocols. Differences were investigated using contemporary beam data for both Monte Carlo simulation and in analytical equations. For primary barriers, NCRP 151 underestimates the dose rate through concrete by on average a factor of 2 with secondary barriers and maze entrance doses having much better agreement. Use of contemporary beam data in Monte Carlo simulation and an analytical equation yielded TVL values much closer to the measured values compared to NCRP 151. The TVL data in NCRP 151 is outdated and needs to be updated based upon the energy spectra of modern linear accelerators. Until then, physicists should use the TVL values shown in this study instead.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI