Opioid versus opioid-free analgesia after surgical discharge: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials

医学 不利影响 科克伦图书馆 梅德林 类阿片 荟萃分析 随机对照试验 临床试验 相对风险 止痛药 物理疗法 麻醉 内科学 置信区间 受体 政治学 法学
作者
Julio F. Fiore,Charbel El‐Kefraoui,Marc-Aurèle Chay,Philip Nguyen-Powanda,Uyen Do,Ghadeer Olleik,Fateme Rajabiyazdi,Araz Kouyoumdjian,Alexa Derksen,Tara Landry,Alexandre Amar‐Zifkin,Amy Bergeron,Agnihotram V. Ramanakumar,Marc O. Martel,L. Lee,Gabriele Baldini,Liane S. Feldman
出处
期刊:The Lancet [Elsevier]
卷期号:399 (10343): 2280-2293 被引量:107
标识
DOI:10.1016/s0140-6736(22)00582-7
摘要

Excessive opioid prescribing after surgery has contributed to the current opioid crisis; however, the value of prescribing opioids at surgical discharge remains uncertain. We aimed to estimate the extent to which opioid prescribing after discharge affects self-reported pain intensity and adverse events in comparison with an opioid-free analgesic regimen.In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Scopus, AMED, Biosis, and CINAHL from Jan 1, 1990, until July 8, 2021. We included multidose randomised controlled trials comparing opioid versus opioid-free analgesia in patients aged 15 years or older, discharged after undergoing a surgical procedure according to the Physiological and Operative Severity Score for the Enumeration of Mortality and Morbidity definition (minor, moderate, major, and major complex). We screened articles, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias (Cochrane's risk-of-bias tool for randomised trials) in duplicate. The primary outcomes of interest were self-reported pain intensity on day 1 after discharge (standardised to 0-10 cm visual analogue scale) and vomiting up to 30 days. Pain intensity at further timepoints, pain interference, other adverse events, risk of dissatisfaction, and health-care reutilisation were also assessed. We did random-effects meta-analyses and appraised evidence certainty using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations scoring system. The review was registered with PROSPERO (ID CRD42020153050).47 trials (n=6607 patients) were included. 30 (64%) trials involved elective minor procedures (63% dental procedures) and 17 (36%) trials involved procedures of moderate extent (47% orthopaedic and 29% general surgery procedures). Compared with opioid-free analgesia, opioid prescribing did not reduce pain on the first day after discharge (weighted mean difference 0·01cm, 95% CI -0·26 to 0·27; moderate certainty) or at other postoperative timepoints (moderate-to-very-low certainty). Opioid prescribing was associated with increased risk of vomiting (relative risk 4·50, 95% CI 1·93 to 10·51; high certainty) and other adverse events, including nausea, constipation, dizziness, and drowsiness (high-to-moderate certainty). Opioids did not affect other outcomes.Findings from this meta-analysis support that opioid prescribing at surgical discharge does not reduce pain intensity but does increase adverse events. Evidence relied on trials focused on elective surgeries of minor and moderate extent, suggesting that clinicians can consider prescribing opioid-free analgesia in these surgical settings. Data were largely derived from low-quality trials, and none involved patients having major or major-complex procedures. Given these limitations, there is a great need to advance the quality and scope of research in this field.The Canadian Institutes of Health Research.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
uraylong发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
1秒前
CodeCraft应助ayeben采纳,获得10
2秒前
3秒前
路过看看完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
龙仔发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
vincentbioinfo完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
5秒前
Lucas应助文艺采纳,获得10
5秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
8秒前
浪子应助lemon 1118采纳,获得10
8秒前
大模型应助uraylong采纳,获得10
8秒前
8秒前
8秒前
wzx完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
9秒前
9秒前
乐乐应助zzz采纳,获得20
9秒前
purple1212发布了新的文献求助30
9秒前
9秒前
spc68应助猪猪hero采纳,获得10
10秒前
BlackP发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
彩色枫发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
12秒前
mumu发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
13秒前
14秒前
14秒前
ayeben发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
我爱亲柠檬完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
蔬菜小鸟完成签到 ,获得积分10
15秒前
16秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
传奇3应助行走的鱼采纳,获得10
16秒前
rainbow完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
17秒前
BlackP完成签到,获得积分10
18秒前
赘婿应助Akoasm采纳,获得10
18秒前
18秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Introduction to strong mixing conditions volume 1-3 5000
Clinical Microbiology Procedures Handbook, Multi-Volume, 5th Edition 2000
从k到英国情人 1500
Ägyptische Geschichte der 21.–30. Dynastie 1100
„Semitische Wissenschaften“? 1100
Real World Research, 5th Edition 800
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 生物 医学 工程类 计算机科学 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 复合材料 内科学 化学工程 人工智能 催化作用 遗传学 数学 基因 量子力学 物理化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 5735237
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 5359154
关于积分的说明 15328898
捐赠科研通 4879502
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2622007
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1571188
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1527971