Opioid versus opioid-free analgesia after surgical discharge: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials

医学 不利影响 科克伦图书馆 梅德林 类阿片 荟萃分析 随机对照试验 临床试验 相对风险 止痛药 物理疗法 麻醉 内科学 置信区间 受体 政治学 法学
作者
Julio F. Fiore,Charbel El‐Kefraoui,Marc-Aurèle Chay,Philip Nguyen-Powanda,Uyen Do,Ghadeer Olleik,Fateme Rajabiyazdi,Araz Kouyoumdjian,Alexa Derksen,Tara Landry,Alexandre Amar‐Zifkin,Amy Bergeron,Agnihotram V. Ramanakumar,Marc O. Martel,L. Lee,Gabriele Baldini,Liane S. Feldman
出处
期刊:The Lancet [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:399 (10343): 2280-2293 被引量:107
标识
DOI:10.1016/s0140-6736(22)00582-7
摘要

Excessive opioid prescribing after surgery has contributed to the current opioid crisis; however, the value of prescribing opioids at surgical discharge remains uncertain. We aimed to estimate the extent to which opioid prescribing after discharge affects self-reported pain intensity and adverse events in comparison with an opioid-free analgesic regimen.In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Scopus, AMED, Biosis, and CINAHL from Jan 1, 1990, until July 8, 2021. We included multidose randomised controlled trials comparing opioid versus opioid-free analgesia in patients aged 15 years or older, discharged after undergoing a surgical procedure according to the Physiological and Operative Severity Score for the Enumeration of Mortality and Morbidity definition (minor, moderate, major, and major complex). We screened articles, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias (Cochrane's risk-of-bias tool for randomised trials) in duplicate. The primary outcomes of interest were self-reported pain intensity on day 1 after discharge (standardised to 0-10 cm visual analogue scale) and vomiting up to 30 days. Pain intensity at further timepoints, pain interference, other adverse events, risk of dissatisfaction, and health-care reutilisation were also assessed. We did random-effects meta-analyses and appraised evidence certainty using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations scoring system. The review was registered with PROSPERO (ID CRD42020153050).47 trials (n=6607 patients) were included. 30 (64%) trials involved elective minor procedures (63% dental procedures) and 17 (36%) trials involved procedures of moderate extent (47% orthopaedic and 29% general surgery procedures). Compared with opioid-free analgesia, opioid prescribing did not reduce pain on the first day after discharge (weighted mean difference 0·01cm, 95% CI -0·26 to 0·27; moderate certainty) or at other postoperative timepoints (moderate-to-very-low certainty). Opioid prescribing was associated with increased risk of vomiting (relative risk 4·50, 95% CI 1·93 to 10·51; high certainty) and other adverse events, including nausea, constipation, dizziness, and drowsiness (high-to-moderate certainty). Opioids did not affect other outcomes.Findings from this meta-analysis support that opioid prescribing at surgical discharge does not reduce pain intensity but does increase adverse events. Evidence relied on trials focused on elective surgeries of minor and moderate extent, suggesting that clinicians can consider prescribing opioid-free analgesia in these surgical settings. Data were largely derived from low-quality trials, and none involved patients having major or major-complex procedures. Given these limitations, there is a great need to advance the quality and scope of research in this field.The Canadian Institutes of Health Research.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
小邓巴发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
1秒前
科研通AI6.1应助Bellow采纳,获得10
4秒前
cy发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
央央发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
脑壳炸裂完成签到 ,获得积分10
7秒前
7秒前
斯文败类应助windleaf采纳,获得30
7秒前
思源应助发大财采纳,获得10
7秒前
丁丁的互助完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
MonMon完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
爆米花应助HTB采纳,获得10
10秒前
医探完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
muxinzx完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
隐形曼青应助央央采纳,获得10
16秒前
17秒前
十三完成签到 ,获得积分10
17秒前
研友_VZG7GZ应助DAY采纳,获得10
17秒前
111关注了科研通微信公众号
18秒前
19秒前
yj完成签到,获得积分10
19秒前
20秒前
渔渔完成签到 ,获得积分10
20秒前
Yew_dog发布了新的文献求助10
21秒前
li发布了新的文献求助10
23秒前
23秒前
HTB发布了新的文献求助10
24秒前
央央完成签到,获得积分10
24秒前
ttyhtg完成签到,获得积分10
24秒前
亓鹏飞完成签到,获得积分20
25秒前
25秒前
隐形曼青应助小齐爱科研采纳,获得10
26秒前
27秒前
共享精神应助成就的迎夏采纳,获得10
27秒前
剑鱼完成签到,获得积分20
27秒前
TiAmo完成签到 ,获得积分10
28秒前
香蕉觅云应助cy采纳,获得10
31秒前
32秒前
liu发布了新的文献求助10
32秒前
鼠鼠完成签到 ,获得积分10
32秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Developing Genetic Editing Tools for Lysobacter 2000
卤化钙钛矿人工突触的研究 2000
Моделирование процессов самоорганизации в кристаллообразующих системах 1000
History of U.S. Space Surveillance and Satellite Cataloging 1000
Signals, Systems, and Signal Processing 610
Fundamentals of Pharmaceutical and Biologics Regulations: A Global Perspective, Second Edition 600
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 物理 内科学 复合材料 催化作用 物理化学 光电子学 电极 细胞生物学 基因 无机化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6516135
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8309144
关于积分的说明 17760129
捐赠科研通 5618352
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2925310
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1902380
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1763529