Opioid versus opioid-free analgesia after surgical discharge: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials

医学 不利影响 科克伦图书馆 梅德林 类阿片 荟萃分析 随机对照试验 临床试验 相对风险 止痛药 物理疗法 麻醉 内科学 置信区间 受体 法学 政治学
作者
Julio F. Fiore,Charbel El‐Kefraoui,Marc-Aurèle Chay,Philip Nguyen-Powanda,Uyen Do,Ghadeer Olleik,Fateme Rajabiyazdi,Araz Kouyoumdjian,Alexa Derksen,Tara Landry,Alexandre Amar‐Zifkin,Amy Bergeron,Agnihotram V. Ramanakumar,Marc O. Martel,L. Lee,Gabriele Baldini,Liane S. Feldman
出处
期刊:The Lancet [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:399 (10343): 2280-2293 被引量:79
标识
DOI:10.1016/s0140-6736(22)00582-7
摘要

Excessive opioid prescribing after surgery has contributed to the current opioid crisis; however, the value of prescribing opioids at surgical discharge remains uncertain. We aimed to estimate the extent to which opioid prescribing after discharge affects self-reported pain intensity and adverse events in comparison with an opioid-free analgesic regimen.In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Scopus, AMED, Biosis, and CINAHL from Jan 1, 1990, until July 8, 2021. We included multidose randomised controlled trials comparing opioid versus opioid-free analgesia in patients aged 15 years or older, discharged after undergoing a surgical procedure according to the Physiological and Operative Severity Score for the Enumeration of Mortality and Morbidity definition (minor, moderate, major, and major complex). We screened articles, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias (Cochrane's risk-of-bias tool for randomised trials) in duplicate. The primary outcomes of interest were self-reported pain intensity on day 1 after discharge (standardised to 0-10 cm visual analogue scale) and vomiting up to 30 days. Pain intensity at further timepoints, pain interference, other adverse events, risk of dissatisfaction, and health-care reutilisation were also assessed. We did random-effects meta-analyses and appraised evidence certainty using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations scoring system. The review was registered with PROSPERO (ID CRD42020153050).47 trials (n=6607 patients) were included. 30 (64%) trials involved elective minor procedures (63% dental procedures) and 17 (36%) trials involved procedures of moderate extent (47% orthopaedic and 29% general surgery procedures). Compared with opioid-free analgesia, opioid prescribing did not reduce pain on the first day after discharge (weighted mean difference 0·01cm, 95% CI -0·26 to 0·27; moderate certainty) or at other postoperative timepoints (moderate-to-very-low certainty). Opioid prescribing was associated with increased risk of vomiting (relative risk 4·50, 95% CI 1·93 to 10·51; high certainty) and other adverse events, including nausea, constipation, dizziness, and drowsiness (high-to-moderate certainty). Opioids did not affect other outcomes.Findings from this meta-analysis support that opioid prescribing at surgical discharge does not reduce pain intensity but does increase adverse events. Evidence relied on trials focused on elective surgeries of minor and moderate extent, suggesting that clinicians can consider prescribing opioid-free analgesia in these surgical settings. Data were largely derived from low-quality trials, and none involved patients having major or major-complex procedures. Given these limitations, there is a great need to advance the quality and scope of research in this field.The Canadian Institutes of Health Research.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
car子完成签到 ,获得积分10
1秒前
Jes发布了新的文献求助30
1秒前
畅快的长颈鹿完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
7秒前
克泷完成签到 ,获得积分10
11秒前
共享精神应助阿司匹林采纳,获得10
11秒前
坚强的蚂蚁完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
Vivian完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
脑洞疼应助雪山飞龙采纳,获得10
16秒前
健康的修洁完成签到 ,获得积分10
17秒前
17秒前
20秒前
CCC完成签到 ,获得积分10
27秒前
嗨Honey完成签到 ,获得积分10
29秒前
超chao完成签到,获得积分10
30秒前
糊涂的麦片完成签到,获得积分10
31秒前
Wind发布了新的文献求助20
32秒前
sylens完成签到,获得积分10
32秒前
科研通AI5应助张先生采纳,获得10
33秒前
昔年完成签到 ,获得积分10
34秒前
小全完成签到,获得积分10
35秒前
37秒前
香菜大王完成签到 ,获得积分10
37秒前
40秒前
Jro完成签到,获得积分10
40秒前
研友_Y59785应助云栖采纳,获得10
41秒前
北风应助nnnn采纳,获得10
43秒前
43秒前
pluto应助可耐的无剑采纳,获得50
44秒前
sylens发布了新的文献求助10
46秒前
雪山飞龙发布了新的文献求助10
47秒前
xiaohanzai88完成签到,获得积分10
51秒前
缥缈的青旋完成签到,获得积分10
53秒前
庸尘完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
所所应助hfy采纳,获得10
1分钟前
123完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
nwds完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
土豪的新儿完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
脑洞疼应助一屿采纳,获得10
1分钟前
orixero应助柚子采纳,获得30
1分钟前
高分求助中
【此为提示信息,请勿应助】请按要求发布求助,避免被关 20000
Continuum Thermodynamics and Material Modelling 2000
Encyclopedia of Geology (2nd Edition) 2000
105th Edition CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics 1600
Maneuvering of a Damaged Navy Combatant 650
Периодизация спортивной тренировки. Общая теория и её практическое применение 310
Mixing the elements of mass customisation 300
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 内科学 复合材料 物理化学 电极 遗传学 量子力学 基因 冶金 催化作用
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3779565
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3325025
关于积分的说明 10221059
捐赠科研通 3040157
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1668640
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 798728
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 758522