Opioid versus opioid-free analgesia after surgical discharge: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials

医学 不利影响 科克伦图书馆 梅德林 类阿片 荟萃分析 随机对照试验 临床试验 相对风险 止痛药 物理疗法 麻醉 内科学 置信区间 受体 政治学 法学
作者
Julio F. Fiore,Charbel El‐Kefraoui,Marc-Aurèle Chay,Philip Nguyen-Powanda,Uyen Do,Ghadeer Olleik,Fateme Rajabiyazdi,Araz Kouyoumdjian,Alexa Derksen,Tara Landry,Alexandre Amar‐Zifkin,Amy Bergeron,Agnihotram V. Ramanakumar,Marc O. Martel,L. Lee,Gabriele Baldini,Liane S. Feldman
出处
期刊:The Lancet [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:399 (10343): 2280-2293 被引量:107
标识
DOI:10.1016/s0140-6736(22)00582-7
摘要

Excessive opioid prescribing after surgery has contributed to the current opioid crisis; however, the value of prescribing opioids at surgical discharge remains uncertain. We aimed to estimate the extent to which opioid prescribing after discharge affects self-reported pain intensity and adverse events in comparison with an opioid-free analgesic regimen.In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Scopus, AMED, Biosis, and CINAHL from Jan 1, 1990, until July 8, 2021. We included multidose randomised controlled trials comparing opioid versus opioid-free analgesia in patients aged 15 years or older, discharged after undergoing a surgical procedure according to the Physiological and Operative Severity Score for the Enumeration of Mortality and Morbidity definition (minor, moderate, major, and major complex). We screened articles, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias (Cochrane's risk-of-bias tool for randomised trials) in duplicate. The primary outcomes of interest were self-reported pain intensity on day 1 after discharge (standardised to 0-10 cm visual analogue scale) and vomiting up to 30 days. Pain intensity at further timepoints, pain interference, other adverse events, risk of dissatisfaction, and health-care reutilisation were also assessed. We did random-effects meta-analyses and appraised evidence certainty using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations scoring system. The review was registered with PROSPERO (ID CRD42020153050).47 trials (n=6607 patients) were included. 30 (64%) trials involved elective minor procedures (63% dental procedures) and 17 (36%) trials involved procedures of moderate extent (47% orthopaedic and 29% general surgery procedures). Compared with opioid-free analgesia, opioid prescribing did not reduce pain on the first day after discharge (weighted mean difference 0·01cm, 95% CI -0·26 to 0·27; moderate certainty) or at other postoperative timepoints (moderate-to-very-low certainty). Opioid prescribing was associated with increased risk of vomiting (relative risk 4·50, 95% CI 1·93 to 10·51; high certainty) and other adverse events, including nausea, constipation, dizziness, and drowsiness (high-to-moderate certainty). Opioids did not affect other outcomes.Findings from this meta-analysis support that opioid prescribing at surgical discharge does not reduce pain intensity but does increase adverse events. Evidence relied on trials focused on elective surgeries of minor and moderate extent, suggesting that clinicians can consider prescribing opioid-free analgesia in these surgical settings. Data were largely derived from low-quality trials, and none involved patients having major or major-complex procedures. Given these limitations, there is a great need to advance the quality and scope of research in this field.The Canadian Institutes of Health Research.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
黄乐丹完成签到 ,获得积分10
2秒前
成就发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
4秒前
yyf完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
李健的小迷弟应助Linly采纳,获得30
5秒前
屿鑫完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
无奈晓筠关注了科研通微信公众号
8秒前
又见白龙完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
令尊是我犬子完成签到 ,获得积分10
8秒前
开朗的向日葵完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
方婷完成签到 ,获得积分20
9秒前
专一的香彤关注了科研通微信公众号
9秒前
yyf发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
积极慕晴完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
夏小安完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
开朗的小蘑菇完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
凌霄同学发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
雪雪完成签到 ,获得积分10
13秒前
李博完成签到,获得积分20
13秒前
15秒前
吟賞烟霞完成签到,获得积分10
19秒前
左丘白桃完成签到,获得积分10
19秒前
宁霸完成签到,获得积分10
21秒前
qijie完成签到,获得积分10
22秒前
润润润完成签到 ,获得积分10
22秒前
科研通AI2S应助文献狗采纳,获得10
26秒前
害羞秋莲完成签到,获得积分10
27秒前
27秒前
无奈晓筠发布了新的文献求助30
27秒前
醉熏的白梦应助夏侯仪采纳,获得50
28秒前
29秒前
Acanyi完成签到,获得积分10
30秒前
香菜完成签到,获得积分10
30秒前
30秒前
lirongcas发布了新的文献求助10
31秒前
jinjinjin完成签到,获得积分10
31秒前
jinjinjin发布了新的文献求助10
35秒前
科研通AI2S应助成就采纳,获得10
36秒前
乐观紫霜发布了新的文献求助10
36秒前
云飞扬应助Davidjun采纳,获得10
36秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Developing Genetic Editing Tools for Lysobacter 2000
卤化钙钛矿人工突触的研究 2000
Моделирование процессов самоорганизации в кристаллообразующих системах 1000
History of U.S. Space Surveillance and Satellite Cataloging 1000
Malcolm Fraser : a biography 700
Signals, Systems, and Signal Processing 610
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 物理 内科学 复合材料 催化作用 物理化学 光电子学 电极 细胞生物学 基因 无机化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6515757
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8308774
关于积分的说明 17757980
捐赠科研通 5617747
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2925146
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1902103
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1763488