Opioid versus opioid-free analgesia after surgical discharge: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials

医学 不利影响 科克伦图书馆 梅德林 类阿片 荟萃分析 随机对照试验 临床试验 相对风险 止痛药 物理疗法 麻醉 内科学 置信区间 受体 政治学 法学
作者
Julio F. Fiore,Charbel El‐Kefraoui,Marc-Aurèle Chay,Philip Nguyen-Powanda,Uyen Do,Ghadeer Olleik,Fateme Rajabiyazdi,Araz Kouyoumdjian,Alexa Derksen,Tara Landry,Alexandre Amar‐Zifkin,Amy Bergeron,Agnihotram V. Ramanakumar,Marc O. Martel,L. Lee,Gabriele Baldini,Liane S. Feldman
出处
期刊:The Lancet [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:399 (10343): 2280-2293 被引量:122
标识
DOI:10.1016/s0140-6736(22)00582-7
摘要

Excessive opioid prescribing after surgery has contributed to the current opioid crisis; however, the value of prescribing opioids at surgical discharge remains uncertain. We aimed to estimate the extent to which opioid prescribing after discharge affects self-reported pain intensity and adverse events in comparison with an opioid-free analgesic regimen.In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Scopus, AMED, Biosis, and CINAHL from Jan 1, 1990, until July 8, 2021. We included multidose randomised controlled trials comparing opioid versus opioid-free analgesia in patients aged 15 years or older, discharged after undergoing a surgical procedure according to the Physiological and Operative Severity Score for the Enumeration of Mortality and Morbidity definition (minor, moderate, major, and major complex). We screened articles, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias (Cochrane's risk-of-bias tool for randomised trials) in duplicate. The primary outcomes of interest were self-reported pain intensity on day 1 after discharge (standardised to 0-10 cm visual analogue scale) and vomiting up to 30 days. Pain intensity at further timepoints, pain interference, other adverse events, risk of dissatisfaction, and health-care reutilisation were also assessed. We did random-effects meta-analyses and appraised evidence certainty using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations scoring system. The review was registered with PROSPERO (ID CRD42020153050).47 trials (n=6607 patients) were included. 30 (64%) trials involved elective minor procedures (63% dental procedures) and 17 (36%) trials involved procedures of moderate extent (47% orthopaedic and 29% general surgery procedures). Compared with opioid-free analgesia, opioid prescribing did not reduce pain on the first day after discharge (weighted mean difference 0·01cm, 95% CI -0·26 to 0·27; moderate certainty) or at other postoperative timepoints (moderate-to-very-low certainty). Opioid prescribing was associated with increased risk of vomiting (relative risk 4·50, 95% CI 1·93 to 10·51; high certainty) and other adverse events, including nausea, constipation, dizziness, and drowsiness (high-to-moderate certainty). Opioids did not affect other outcomes.Findings from this meta-analysis support that opioid prescribing at surgical discharge does not reduce pain intensity but does increase adverse events. Evidence relied on trials focused on elective surgeries of minor and moderate extent, suggesting that clinicians can consider prescribing opioid-free analgesia in these surgical settings. Data were largely derived from low-quality trials, and none involved patients having major or major-complex procedures. Given these limitations, there is a great need to advance the quality and scope of research in this field.The Canadian Institutes of Health Research.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
刚刚
雷金炜完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
1秒前
没洗脸发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
3秒前
繁花完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
L91完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
NexusExplorer的应助被柴胡采纳,获得10
5秒前
啵啵完成签到 ,获得积分10
5秒前
合适幼荷发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
5秒前
tomorrow完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
柚子完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
YONGHUMING发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
不要洋葱完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
超文献完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
雪碧完成签到,获得积分20
9秒前
Jsl完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
Ava的应助被鲜艳的傲薇采纳,获得10
10秒前
二十八画生完成签到 ,获得积分10
11秒前
13秒前
把子肉好吃完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
bcl发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
Ablebolt完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
迟迟发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
传奇3的应助被春秋蚕采纳,获得10
14秒前
小灰灰完成签到,获得积分0
14秒前
开心向真完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
爱撒娇的西装完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
知之然完成签到,获得积分0
16秒前
喂喂喂完成签到 ,获得积分10
17秒前
18秒前
风随完成签到,获得积分10
18秒前
顺心谷冬完成签到 ,获得积分10
19秒前
19秒前
19秒前
静汐完成签到,获得积分10
21秒前
故意的含灵完成签到,获得积分10
22秒前
上官若男的应助被zhf采纳,获得10
23秒前
Jasper的应助被TEDDY采纳,获得10
23秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
拉伸高分子熔体中缠结行为的模拟和小角中子散射研究 1080
Encyclopedia of Modern Artificial Intelligence 1000
Особенности технологий и методов информационно-психологических войн СССР с Великобританией и США в период 1939-1953 гг 1000
Das Matthäusevangelium: Kapitel 1:1–17 1000
Analyses de reconnaissances de dettes passées devant les échevins d'Ypres (1249-1291) 600
Cellulose and Cellulose Derivatives: Synthesis, Modification and Applications 600
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 计算机科学 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 物理 复合材料 内科学 催化作用 光电子学 人工智能 细胞生物学 无机化学 物理化学 数学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 8142696
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9542320
关于积分的说明 21650319
捐赠科研通 7727705
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3421714
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2547151
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2464469