Primary Drug-Coated Balloon Versus Drug-Eluting Stent for Native Atherosclerotic Femoropopliteal Lesions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

医学 血管成形术 气球 经皮 荟萃分析 动脉切除术 放射科 狭窄 外科 支架 血运重建 解剖(医学) 靶病变 再狭窄 内科学 经皮冠状动脉介入治疗 心肌梗塞
作者
Gladiol Zenunaj,Luca Traina,Pierfilippo Acciarri,Alessio Mario Cosacco,Francesca Alesiani,Giulia Baldazzi,Vincenzo Gasbarro
出处
期刊:Annals of Vascular Surgery [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:92: 294-303 被引量:15
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.avsg.2023.01.043
摘要

In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we aimed to compare drug-coated balloon (DCB) to drug-eluting stent (DES) angioplasty as a primary option in patients with femoropopliteal lesions in terms of primary patency and freedom from clinically driven target lesion revascularization (cdTLR) and major adverse limb events (MALE).A comprehensive literature search was performed using the PubMed and Embase databases. All studies written in English language and reporting data presenting a comparison between patients receiving primary percutaneous balloon angioplasty using the DCB versus primary percutaneous stenting with DES for native femoropopliteal lesions were included in this meta-analysis.There were 984 patients with 1,078 femoropopliteal lesions, of which procedures with DCB and DES were performed in 514 and 564 lesions, respectively. Overall, majority patients were men with a mean age of 70.9 years, and there were no significant differences between the 2 groups regarding the cardiovascular comorbidities. With regards to the procedural strategy, there was significant heterogeneity in the DCB group. This included adjunctive procedures such as atherectomy besides the angioplasty of the target vessel, which was reported in 1 study as a part of 32.1% of the procedures in the DCB group. Provisional bare metal stents (pBMS) for residual stenosis and dissection were used in 4 studies with a percentage varying from 14.8 to 25.3%. Overall, at 1 year, all outcomes were similar for all the end points; however, where adjunctive procedures were performed (atherectomy + pBMS) in the DCB group, the outcomes were better (primary patency p.001, freedom cdTLR p.001, and freedom form MALE p.002). In studies where no adjunctive procedures were performed in the DCB group, the results favored the DES group for the primary patency (p.026) and freedom from cdTLR (p.044).DES seems to be superior in terms of cdTLR and primary patency at 1 year when compared to the procedures performed solely with DCB. For DCB to achieve optimal results, further adjunctive procedures such as pBMS and atherectomy are needed. More studies are needed to confirm the superiority of the primary stenting with DES at the femoropopliteal segment.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
lc应助郭mm采纳,获得10
刚刚
娇娇发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
Pery应助郭mm采纳,获得10
刚刚
请叫我风吹麦浪应助郭mm采纳,获得10
刚刚
彭于晏应助初雪平寒采纳,获得10
1秒前
谦让谷菱发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
wangqing发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
小雨发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
4秒前
科研通AI2S应助暴富采纳,获得10
5秒前
韩晚渔发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
勤恳的黑夜完成签到 ,获得积分10
6秒前
6秒前
独孤阳光完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
嘟嘟发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
搜集达人应助大糖糕僧采纳,获得10
7秒前
358489228完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
ddd发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
yixing完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
李云完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
8秒前
hahaha发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
松鼠完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
13379307178完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
lishuai完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
乏味关注了科研通微信公众号
12秒前
ding应助Lionel采纳,获得10
12秒前
Fischl完成签到 ,获得积分10
12秒前
13秒前
精明的沅发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
Lucas应助连小小采纳,获得30
13秒前
imi应助谦让谷菱采纳,获得10
14秒前
SYLH应助谦让谷菱采纳,获得10
14秒前
14秒前
优雅依秋发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
迪仔完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
16秒前
18秒前
19秒前
大糖糕僧发布了新的文献求助10
19秒前
高分求助中
Picture Books with Same-sex Parented Families: Unintentional Censorship 700
ACSM’s Guidelines for Exercise Testing and Prescription, 12th edition 500
Nucleophilic substitution in azasydnone-modified dinitroanisoles 500
不知道标题是什么 500
Indomethacinのヒトにおける経皮吸収 400
Phylogenetic study of the order Polydesmida (Myriapoda: Diplopoda) 370
Effective Learning and Mental Wellbeing 300
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 遗传学 基因 物理化学 催化作用 冶金 细胞生物学 免疫学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3974559
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3518949
关于积分的说明 11196503
捐赠科研通 3255066
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1797673
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 877076
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 806130