医学
哮喘
喇嘛
安慰剂
科克伦图书馆
毒蕈碱拮抗剂
内科学
荟萃分析
儿科
慢性阻塞性肺病
敌手
病理
受体
替代医学
作者
Yuji Oba,Sumayya Anwer,Tarang Patel,Tinashe Maduke,Sofia Dias
标识
DOI:10.1002/14651858.cd013797.pub2
摘要
The review findings suggest that MD- or HD-ICS/LABA and MD-ICS/LAMA reduce moderate to severe asthma exacerbations and increase the odds of ACQ responders compared to MD-ICS whereas HD-ICS probably does not. The evidence is generally stronger for MD- and HD-ICS/LABA than for MD-ICS/LAMA primarily due to a larger evidence base. There is no evidence to suggest that ICS/LABA, ICS/LAMA, or HD-ICS/LABA reduces severe asthma exacerbations or SAEs compared to MD-ICS. MD-ICS/LAMA likely reduces all-cause AEs and results in a slight reduction in treatment discontinuation due to AEs compared to MD-ICS. The above findings may assist in deciding on a treatment option during the stepwise approach of asthma management. Longer-term safety of higher than medium-dose ICS needs to be addressed in phase 4 or observational studies given that the median duration of included studies was six months.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI